data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f507a/f507a195d5fb768164e5b61ae42dd28b718fb53e" alt="DH外貿(mào)公司OEM箱包供應商評價與選擇之工商管理研究_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab414/ab4146ea84becadcd48d5978c32f4bb3ab4559bb" alt="DH外貿(mào)公司OEM箱包供應商評價與選擇之工商管理研究_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7238f/7238fd1c81f4fa9901456323e8583a5749c82283" alt="DH外貿(mào)公司OEM箱包供應商評價與選擇之工商管理研究_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77154/77154385b0600cad90ebc98afdbf13c8955099c2" alt="DH外貿(mào)公司OEM箱包供應商評價與選擇之工商管理研究_第4頁"
下載本文檔
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、DH外貿(mào)公司OEM箱包供應商評價與選擇之工商管理研究本文是一篇工商管理論文,本文在現(xiàn)有研究的基礎上,引入供應商評價基本模型,將供應商績效考核指標定為供應商能力與供應商合作意愿。由于 DH 公司的供應商評價及選擇研究的問題在外貿(mào) OEM 箱包行業(yè)有一定的普遍存在性,本文希望通過為情況相近的的外貿(mào)箱包公司提供操作性強的示范,為企業(yè)構(gòu)建屬于自己的評價指標體系提供科學思路,進而提高公司的盈利和競爭力。Chapter I Introduction1.1 Research Background and MeaningWith the rapid development of modern informat
2、ion technology and economicglobalization, bags commodity centers in China are becoming more and more mature.Driven by bags & luggage exhibitions in Hongkong and Mainland China, manyforeign customers visit China frequently and are familiar with the bags & luggagemarket in China. Some foreign
3、customers have even set up offices in China, dealingwith procurement and merchandising. At the same time, with the mature developmentof international trade, the domestic bags factories attach great importance to theimprovement of their own business quality. Many bags factories have set up their ownf
4、oreign trade department, directly receive orders from foreign customers, and activelyparticipate in international bags & luggage exhibitions held at home and abroad. Thishas greatly increase the chance for foreign customers to do business directly withdomestic factories. These factors lead to mo
5、re and more transparent prices of bagsproducts. As the foreign trade company is getting the price difference as their mainprofit, their profit is sharply reduced, and the survival and development space isseriously threatened.By facing the situation of the foreign customers are familiar with the prod
6、uction areaand buying price of bags in China market, it is very important for foreign tradecompanies to select the correct OEM bags suppliers. A good OEM supplier canprovide competitive prices, and also bring competitive advantages to foreign tradecompanies in terms of delivery time, quality, servic
7、e, cooperation willingness, so thatit makes it possible for the foreign trade company to win orders from customers underthe situation of the market price is transparent and the customer is likely to cooperatedirectly with bags factories. Foreign trade companies should give full play to theiradvantag
8、es in familiarity with the local supply market and choose properly their OEMsuppliers, for their survival and development to create greater space.1.2 Research MethodsFirstly, this paper studies the current situation and trend of supplier selection throughliterature research method, then analyzes the
9、 problems and causes of supplierselection in DH foreign trade company through case study method, and finally usesqualitative and quantitative analysis method to analyze the data of DH company forthree consecutive years from 2015 to 2018. By using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP), this paper pairw
10、ise compares the importance of supplier selection indicators,builds a matrix and establishes a supplier selection model based on AHP. The specificresearch methods used are as follows:(1) Literature research methodBy looking up books, professional journals and other information, on the one hand, Ican
11、 understand the relevant theoretical knowledge of supplier selection, researchstatus and development trends at home and abroad, on the other hand, I also know thedevelopment trends of the industry. These can provide a solid theoretical foundationfor the writing of this thesis.(2) Qualitative and qua
12、ntitative analysisBy using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the hierarchical structure andjudgment matrix are established, and the related factors of the potential suppliers inthe candidate list are evaluated and ranked in combination with qualitative andquantitative evaluation. Then, the reaso
13、nable selection decision is made to select thebest supplier for the company.Chapter II Literature Review2.1 Basic Concept of OEMOEM, its full name is Original Engineer Manufacture. Literally, OEM meansmanufacture on assignment or licensing manufacturing. It means that the brandcontroller controls th
14、e R&D and sales channels of new products through its ownunique core technology while the actual manufacturing work is entrusted to otherenterprises (OEM suppliers). In the process of cooperation, the relationship betweenthe two sides is brand owner and OEM manufacturer 18.Worldwide, business act
15、ivities under OEM management mode are common. Forexample, when a manufacturer gets an order and it is difficult for the manufacturer todeliver the goods according to the stipulations but does not want to lose customers, hewill buy the same products from other suppliers and stick his own brand on the
16、products to deliver them; and for example, some department stores which do not havetheir own production capacity will buy all the goods from outside suppliers. Therefore,the sales channel, market position of the brand side and the production advantages ofthe manufacturer jointly create a high-qualit
17、y image of the product, thus achieving awin-win situation for both sides 29.2.2 Supplier Evaluation Criteria2.2.1 Research Status of Supplier Evaluation CriteriaAs early as 1966, Dickson took the lead in building a comprehensive evaluation indexsystem for suppliers. Dickson collected data from about
18、 300 purchasing managersthrough a survey conducted by the American Association of Purchasing Managers.After statistical analysis, 23 common evaluation indicators were obtained. Afteranalyzing the importance of these common evaluation indicators, we get theimportance ranking 37. Since then, Weber has
19、 collected the frequency of 23common evaluation indicators proposed by Dickson through the analysis of relevantliterature on supplier evaluation and selection, so as to reflect the importance rankingof the indicators 43. The results show that Dickson and Weber are basicallyconsistent with the import
20、ance ranking of common indicators.The research on supplier evaluation index system started relatively late in China. In1997, the supply chain research group of Huazhong University of Science andTechnology (HUST) found that when evaluating and selecting suppliers, domesticenterprises mainly considere
21、d quality, delivery, price, variety diversity, batchflexibility and so on.Since then, with the continuous change of economic environment and the continuousimprovement of people s cognitive level, scholars at home and abroad have furtherstudied and discussed the basic evaluation indicators of supplie
22、rs based on theprinciples of systematicness, scientificity, flexibility, growth, practicability andmaneuverability from different perspectives 33. The price index system had beenconstantly revised and perfected. Goffin believed that the supplier evaluation indexsystem should also include quality rec
23、ords, implementation level, TQM awareness,financial stability, timely production capacity, environmental standards, total cost,social responsibility and other indicators 24. In China, Bai Shizhen and others usedthe method of principal component analysis and entropy to study the selection ofspecific
24、indicators in supplier evaluation 01.Chapter III Case Description.143.1 Introduction to Industry Backgr.153.2 Company Profile.15Chapter IV Problem Analysis.224.1 Main Problems of OEM Bags Purchase of DH Company. 224.1.1 Late Delivery.224.1.2 Low Quality.23Chapter V OEM Bags Supplier Selection Strate
25、gy of DH Company. 295.1 Re-establish A Cross-functional Department Evaluation Team. 295.2 Replan the Process of Supplier Evaluation and Selection.30Chapter V OEM Bag Supplier Selection Strategy of DH Company5.1 Re-establish A Cross-functional Department Evaluation TeamSupplier evaluation and selection is a key section during the whole procurementpr
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 品牌傭金合同范本
- 公司保潔合同補充合同范本
- 用氣合同范本
- 豪華公寓租賃合同(2篇)
- 二零二五年度培訓機構(gòu)退費退學協(xié)議合同
- 二零二五年度知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律文件起草與審核合同
- 2025年度草原承包與草原生態(tài)補償實施合同
- 二零二五年度住宅小區(qū)房產(chǎn)買賣合同(無中介費)物業(yè)服務協(xié)議
- 二零二五年度文化旅游項目股權(quán)收購與文化傳承合同
- 2025年度科技創(chuàng)新項目借款合同特點解析
- 軟件系統(tǒng)項目實施方案(共3篇)
- 2025年山東藥品食品職業(yè)學院高職單招職業(yè)技能測試近5年??及鎱⒖碱}庫含答案解析
- 2025年恩施市福牛物業(yè)有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 《滾動軸承-》課件
- 2025年中國CAR-T免疫細胞治療行業(yè)市場發(fā)展前景研究報告-智研咨詢發(fā)布
- 妊娠期用藥安全課件
- 月子會所護理人員禮儀
- GB/T 44958-2024化工設備安全管理規(guī)范
- 無人機行業(yè)調(diào)查研究報告
- 2025年軋鋼原料工技能考試題庫
- 大學生考研規(guī)劃
評論
0/150
提交評論