尋找價(jià)值和維護(hù)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)_第1頁(yè)
尋找價(jià)值和維護(hù)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)_第2頁(yè)
尋找價(jià)值和維護(hù)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)_第3頁(yè)
尋找價(jià)值和維護(hù)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)_第4頁(yè)
尋找價(jià)值和維護(hù)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩42頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

Session8THESEARCHFORVALUEANDSUSTAINABLECOMPETITIVEADVANTAGE

SustainablecompetitiveadvantageTheultimatedeterminantsofsuccessandfailureinthefirm’ssearchforvalue.Arethereanyusefulgeneralisationstobemadewhichcanhelptoguidethestrategyprocess?SustainablecompetitiveadvantageandresourcebasedtheoryIntroduction::anexaminationofthesourcesofsustainabilityofprofitsWhyaresomefirmsabletosustainsuccessoveralongperiod?Porter’sapproachtobusinessperformance::competitiveadvantage.ThecapabilitiesapproachtofirmperformanceThenatureandsignificanceofcapabilitiesArchitecture,reputation,andinnovationThevalueofcapabilities:Aresourcebasedtheoryoffirmperformance::Peteraf’smodel.ConclusionsPart1:Porter’sapproachPorter’sfiveforcesapproach(industryattractiveness)seesindustryperformanceasafunctionofindustrystructure/conduct.(P&S,table10.1)BUTwithinindustriesfirmperformancevaries,Sowhatdeterminesrelativefirmperformance?In‘CompetitiveAdvantage’hetriedtoanswerthis?Porter,cont.‘Competitiveadvantage’arguesthatitdependsonthefirm’sabilitytomanagethecostdrivers/differentiationdriverssoastoproduceacostadvantageoradifferentiationadvantage.Butthisapproachhasproblemsandisincomplete.SomequestionsaboutPorterWhydoesthesuccessfulfirmnotbuytheunsuccessfulandteachithowtominimisecosts?Whydoesthesuccessfulfirmnotsellitsexpertiseincostreducingtolesssuccessfulfirms?Whydoesthesuccessfulfirmnotcutitspricesanddriveitscompetitorsoutofbusiness?Whydoestheunsuccessfulfirmnotbidfortheexecutive(s)inchargeofcostdriversfromthesuccessfulfirm?Thesedohappen:e.g.battlebetweenGeneralMotorsandVolkswagenfortheservicesofcostguruMr.Lopez.Porter’srecipeIfitispossibleforMichaelPortertodescribehowtocreateandsustaincompetitiveadvantagethensurelyallfirmshaveequalaccesstothisknowledgeoncePorterhascodifiedit.SocanitbeasourceofSCA?Bewarerecipes!Finally,lowcost/differentiationcan’tbetheultimatesource.Theultimatesourceissurelywhoorwhatproducesthelowcost/differentiationadvantage.BeyondPorterDoesanyoneofferabetterexplanationoftherootsofbusinessperformance?Inthe90’sacapabilitiesapproachemergedasa‘neworthodoxy’leadingtoadistinctive‘resourcebasedview’ofthefirmandstrategy.Part2:Thecapabilitiesapproach

Question:Whatcouldgiveaparticularfirmasustainableedgeoveritsrivals?AseriesofinfluentialarticlesintheHBRduringthe90’ssuggestedanewapproach(althoughitturnedoutitsoriginsweremuchearlier)PrahaladandHamel(1990):

corecompetenciesManagement’sabilitytoconsolidatetechnologyandproductionskillsintocompetenciessothebusinesscanadaptquicklytochangingopportunities/circumstances.Corecompetencies=collectivelearningoftheorganisationaboutprod/tech/markets.

e.g.Sony’sminiaturisationskills.Competencieshavetobebuiltoveralongperiod.Theyaredifficulttoidentifypreciselyandhardtoimitate.Manyfirmsfailtoidentifytheirowncorecompetenciesandsofailtonurturethemproperlyorexploitthemfully.Stalk,Evans,andShulman(1992):capabilitiesCompetitiveadvantageisbasedontheabilitytorespondtoevolvingopportunitieswhichdependsonbusinessprocessesorcapabilities.Businesssuccessinvolveschoosingtherightcapabilitiestobuild,managingthemcarefully,andexploitingthemfully.

e.g.Honda,Canon.Chandler(1990):initialriskyinvestmentsChandler(1990):successfulgiantssuchasIBMandBayerderivefromtheinitialheavyandriskyinvestmentsinbuildingorganisationalknowledgeandcapabilitieswhichallowedthemtoexploittheopportunitiesavailabletoexploitscaleandscopeeconomies.CollisandMontgomery(1995):competingonresourcesCompetitiveadvantagederivesultimatelyfromtheownershipofavaluableresource.Superiorperformancederivesfromdevelopinga‘competitivelydistinct’setofresourcesanddeployingtheminawellconceivedstrategy.Resourcescanbephysical,intangible,ororganisationalcapabilities.Example:MarksandSpencer(poortiming!)JohnKay(1993):Distinctivecapabilities.Inhisbestseller,‘‘Thefoundationsofcorporatesuccess’Kayarguesthatthesourceofcompetitiveadvantageisthecreationandexploitationofdistinctivecapabilities.Thevalueofanyadvantagecreateddependsonitssustainabilityanditsappropriability.Kayprovidesadetailedanalysisofthis(seealsoP&S)DistinctivecapabilitiesKayidentifiesonlythreebasictypesofdistinctivecapability:CorporateArchitectureInnovationReputation.DistinctivecapabilitiesWhatisitaboutthesethingsinparticular?Difficulttobuildandmaintain.Difficulttocodify/makeintorecipes.Difficulttocopy/emulate.Can’’tsimplybebought‘‘offtheshelf’’.StrategicassetsHealsodiscussesmarketdominance(monopoly)basedontheownershipofstrategicassetsasasourceofsuccess.Naturalmonopoliessuchasutilitynetworks,orlicensedmonopoliessuchasthenationallottery.Andthosebasedonheavysunkcostswhichdiscouragechallengersforthefirstmover.Buthearguesthatinthesecaseitisessentiallystructuralfactorsthatcountnotdistinctivecapabilities.Theremayofcourseberoomfordebateinsomecases.ArchitectureasadistinctivecapabilityConcernsorganisationaleffectivenessinthesearchforvalue.Connectsbacktothediscussionofcorporateobjectivesandtheco-operationneededtogetthingsdoneinP&Schap4.Howtofocusindividualsonachievingorganisationalgoals.ArchitectureThenetworkofcontractualrelationshipswhichdefinesthefirm.Thecapacityoforganisationsto:1.Createandstoreorganisationalknowledgeandroutines2.Promotemoreeffectiveco-operationbetweenthemembers.3.Achieveanopenandeasyflowofinformationbetweenmembers.4.Adaptrapidlyandflexibly.ArchitectureArchitectureislargelyabouthowyouorganisetogetthingsdoneaseffectivelyaspossible.ButNBitalsoinfluenceswhatyouchoosetodo(strategy)inthefirstplace.Because?Architectureisaboutorganisationalform,incentivemechanisms,workorganisation,performanceevaluation,andgovernance.Architecturee.g.IBMinitsheyday,MarksandSpencer(backwhen!),LiverpoolFootballClub.e.g.ManyJapanesefirms:theJapaneseemploymentsystem,itssuppliernetworks,thecloserelationsbetweenindustryandfinance,thegreatemphasisonco-operationandcollaboration,thedevelopmentoflongtermcommercialrelationships,andthegenerallyhigherleveloftrustwhichencouragesco-operationArchitectureNowaspecialisedstudyarea.Seeforexample,Brickley,Smith,andZimmerman:EconomicsandOrganisationalArchitecture.ReputationasadistinctivecapabilityThisisaboutconveyinginformationtoconsumersaboutquality.Butitisn’tequallyimportantforallgoodsandservices.Itappliestoaparticularcategoryofgoodscalled,Longtermexperiencegoods.Thesearegoodswhereproductqualityisvitaltotheconsumerbutwhereitisdifficultfortheconsumertoestablishqualityexceptthroughtimeandexperience.ReputationKaymentionscarhireservices,legalservices,accountancyservices,funeralservices(?),consumerdurables.Addvitaminpills,roofingservices,pensionfunds,and………Allstudentsareveryfamiliarwiththeprobleminvolved.ReputationProblemisthatyouwantquality,butthatqualitytakestimetomanifestitself.Allsupplierswill‘‘guaranteesatisfaction’’.Howcanyoudistinguishbetweenthem?Ifdifficultthenconsumerswillassumelowqualityandpayonlylowprices.Ifyoucanconvincethemyoucanobtainapremiumpriceforqualityassurance.ReputationSellingonreputationissayingwehavemadeaninvestmentinanassetsowehavealottoloseifwefailtosatisfy.Soyoucantrustus,butnotthe‘‘hitandrun’supplierswhosellon(low)pricealone.Howmightitbedone.Longevity(est.1768sortofthing).Warranties.Advertising?AdvertisingandreputationHeavyadvertisingmaybeaway.Advisasunkcostwhichimpliescommitmenttotheservice.Thereissomethingtolose.Evidenceisthat‘‘longtermexperience’’goodsdohavethehighestadv/salesratio(5%).(B.S.R.1992).ReputationanddiversificationNoteforlater,ReputationmightbeabasisforgrowththroughdiversificationbutKaynotesthatanexpensivelycreatedreputationcanbedamagedbyunwisediversificationwhenfirmsstrayintoareastheydon’’tfullyunderstand.InnovationasadistinctivecapabilityAcapacityforloweringcostsorimprovingitsproductsorintroducingnewproductsaheadofitscompetitors.Innovationbyitselfasasourceofcompetitiveadvantageisactuallyquiterare.Innovationisverydifficult.Itisuncertain,anditishardtomanageproperly.Therearenorecipes.ItcanbedifficultforfirmswhichinvestinR&Dtosecureorappropriateallthereturns.Sobeingabletodoitwellwillundoubtedlygiveyouagoodedge.Howevermanyfirmswhichseekcompetitiveadvantagebythisroutefail.TheValueofCapabilitiesDistinctivecapabilitiesgeneratesuccesswhichattractscompetitors.Theirvaluedependsontheirsustainabilityandtheappropriabilityofthevaluetheygenerate.(seealsoCollisetalHBR95)Theseinturndependonthefollowingfactors:TheValueofCapabilitiesTransparency:howeasyisittoidentifyandunderstand?J.managementtechniques?Replicability:howeasytoimitate/replicate?Ateamformationsuchas4-4-2iseasy,butGerman‘‘efficiency’’orBrazilian‘‘flair’’ismoredifficult.Substitutability:Howeasytofindasubstitutefor.Sonyo/mofinnovation,M&Ssupplychainorganisation.TheValueofCapabilitiesWhocapturestheincomestreamfromthecapability?Theorganisationortheunderlyingresources.Thisistheissueofappropriability.Tobevaluabletotheorganisationthecapabilityhastobeimmobile/organisationallyspecific.Notabletowalk!AppropriabilityResourcessuchaspeoplearemarketableandcancapturetheirfullmarketvalue.Sotheorganisation’scapabilityhastobemorethanthesumofits(marketable)parts.TakeManchesterUnitedandtheRoyKeaneeffect(£50,000perweek!).TobeavaluablebusinessMUmustproduceateamcapabilitybeyondthemarketvalueofitsexpensiveplayersandcoaches.TosumupThevalueoftheorganisationscapabilityrequiresthatthecompetition:Can’tseeiteasily.Can’timitateit.Can’tfindasubforit.Can’tjustbuyit.IsolatingmechanismsNamegiventobarrierspreventingthereplicationoforganisationscapabilities.Causalambiguity.Timecompressiondiseconomies.Extracostsofaccumulatingresourcesandcapabilitiesquicklytotakeonafirstmover.PART3:RESOURCEBASED‘‘THEORY’’OFTHEFIRMAdistinctiveresourcebased‘‘theory’’ofthefirmhasemergedtryingtoformalisethecapabilitiesapproach.The““resource-based”approachisconcernedwiththenatureofthefirm’’sresourcesandhowtheseresourcesarecombinedintocapabilities.KeyexampleisPeteraf(1993).Herapproachisoutlinedbelowandsummedupinthisfigure.NotesheusesthetermRENTcommoninUSwritingtoconnotetheresultofsustainablecompetitiveadvantage.TheLinnexampleisfromastudentcasestudy.PeterafmodelHeterogeneityEx-postlimits

tocompetitionImperfect

mobilityEx-antelimits

tocompetitionRentsobtainedRentscaptured

bythefirmRentssustainedRentsnotoffset

bybuildingcostsCompetitive

advantageCompetitiveAdvantageEx-postlimitstocompetitionEx-antelimitstocompetitionHeterogeneityImperfectMobilityTheindustryismadeoffirmswithaccesstodifferentresourcesandskills.Linnhasparticulardistinctivecompetencies.SpecialistknowledgeandreputationSharedspecialistknowledgeandreputationLinnhasdemonstratedanabilitytoleveragethepotentialofexistingtechnologiesPeteraf’smodel-LinnProductsALLTHESELEADTOSUSTAINABLECOMPETITIVEADVANTAGETHROUGHDIFFERENTATIONCompetitiveAdvantagealaPeterafAfirmissaidtohaveacompetitiveadvantagewhenitcan:achieverents:whichrequiresresourceheterogeneitybetweenfirms(somebetterbundlesthanothers).enjoyrentsthatarenotoffsetbythecostsofachievingasuperiorsetofresources:whichrequiresexantelimitstocompetitionforthoseresources.appropriatethoserentsforthefirm:whichrequiresimperfectresourcemobility.sustainthoserents:whichrequiresex-postlimitstocompetition.Heterogeneity:Bundlesofresourcesandcapabilitiesareheterogeneousacrossfirms.Heterogeneityimpliesthatfirmswithsuperiorresources/capabilitieswillearnsuperiorreturns.Animportantclassofresourcesarethosewhicharelimitedintheshortrunbutmayberenewedandexpandedwithinfirmsthatusethem.PrahaladandHamel(1990)arguethatcorecompetencies-particularlyknowledge-basedresources-areenhancedastheyareusedbecauseoflearning.Ex-postlimitstocompetitionForceswhichlimitcompetitionfromimitators.Thesearisefromsourcesalreadydiscussed:Imperfectimitability,replicability,andsubstitutabilityofresources/capabilitiesisolatingthefirmfromchallengers.ExantelimitstocompetitionThesourceofafirm’’srentsisasuperiorresourceposition.Butimaginethesituationbeforeanyfirmhasachievedthisposition.Ifmanyfirmsrecogniseditspotential,acompetitivestrugglewouldensuetoobtaintheresourcesandbuildthecapabilitiestooccupythatposition.Thisprocesswouldcompeteawayallrentsthatcouldbeobtainedfromoccupyingtheposition.Forexample,NorthSeaOilfields.ManchesterUnitedteam!NationalLotterylicence.Sonylicencefortransistor.Thescriptfor‘FourweddingsandaFuneral’EntrepreneurshipandrentSoafirmneedstheforesighttoacquireresourcesandbuildcapabilitiesintheabsenceofsuchcompetition.Thisrequiresthepresenceofuncertaintyandincompleteinformationandawillingnesstotakerisks.TheessenceofsuccessfulENTREPRENEURSHIPisofcourseforesightandtakingadvantageofuncertaintyandincompleteinformationbeforesomeoneelsedoes.SowhatPeterafseemstobesayinghereissimplythatallrentsbeginwithanentrepreneurialact.Whic

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論