版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
GroupingtheGifted:Pro
KennethMott
I.RelevantInformationIQ(IntelligenceQuotient)
intelligenceofapersonIQ=mentalage÷chronologicalage×100
IQscoresDescription130ormoreVerysuperior120–129Superior110-119Brightnormal90-109Average80-89Dullnormal70–79Borderline69orlowerMentallydefectiveIntelligencehypotheticalconstructdescribeindividualdifferencesunobservableandimmeasurableOrganizationoftheTestMott’sdefinitionofthegiftedchildrenpara1—para2Hisargumentforgiftedgrouping
para3---para4III.Questionofcreatingacastepara5---para9teacher’sattitudesaremoredecisive.IV.Issueofachievementpara10---para18howtomeasuregrowth?Unreliable?author’sownexperimentV.Conclusionpara19---para20OrganizationandDevelopmentOpposingviewsagainstgiftedgroupingandtheauthor’srefutationofthem(Paragraphs5–18)questionMott’sdefinitionofthegiftedchildren(Paragraphs1–2)Thenotionofthegiftedisnormallyassociatedwithahighlevelofintelligence,butMott’sdefinitionemphasizesinterestandabilityaswellasintelligence.Iregardgiftedchildrenasthosewhopossesssomequalityorinnateabilitywhichhasbeenrecognizedandidentifiedbyanynumberoftestingandobservationdevicesandwho
manifestinterestandsuccessineitherphysical,intellectual,orartisticpursuits(adefinitionbytheauthor)ThegreatestadvantageofgroupingingiftedaccordingtoMottHowcanwedealwiththesegifted?i
firmlybelievethatweshouldgroupthemasnearlyaspossibleaccordingtointerestandability(giftedness)andchallengethemwithatypeofprogramthatwillhelpthem(to)growtothefullestextentoftheirabilitiesandcapacities.Paragraphs3怎樣才能有效地培養(yǎng)這些有天分的孩子呢?我深信,我們應(yīng)該盡可能的按照他們的興趣能力來編組,制定出一套能幫助他們充分的發(fā)揮特長和能力的教學(xué)計(jì)劃來鞭策他們。
anotherkindoffearhintedatinthepassage
Itisthefearofpushingthegiftedbeyondtheirendurance.Refertopara.15.
Ihavelittlefearofgiftedstudents(’)beingpushed16beyondtheirendurance,forIhavefaithintheabilityofmostteacherstorecognizethelimitstowhichanystudentshouldbepushed.Ontheotherhand,Idon'tbelievegiftednessshouldbewastedawaysimplybecauseabrightortalentedstudentiscontenttoproceedatwhatis—forhim—asnail'spaceortostandatthetopofaclassofstudentswithlessability我絲毫不懼怕天才學(xué)生會被推到超出他們承受力的地步,因?yàn)槲蚁嘈糯蠖鄶?shù)教師有能力識別某一學(xué)生應(yīng)被推至的極限;但我相信天賦不應(yīng)該僅僅只是因?yàn)槟骋宦斆骰蛴胁拍艿膶W(xué)生滿足于對他來講簡直是蝸牛爬行的前進(jìn)速度、或處于一個(gè)能力較差的學(xué)生班的最前列而被浪費(fèi)Nomatterwhetheryouagreewiththeauthorornot,becriticalandpointoutanyvulnerablepointsinhisargument.Mott’sdefinitionofthegiftedemphasizesapupil’sinterestandability.Onecouldprobablyargue:Dointerestandabilityalwaysgotogether?Obviously,therearemanymorepeopleinterestedbutnotgiftedinmusicthanrealmusicgeniuses.EvenMotthimselfadmitsthattherearenoreliabledevicesformeasuringgrowthinsuchareasascreativity,attitudes…(SeeParagraph12).Ifpupilsareallgroupedaccordingtotheirinterestandability,cantheyallbeexpectedtofulfilltherequirementssetforprimaryandsecondaryschooling?
Whatdifficultydoestheauthorencounterwhenitcomestotheassessmentoftheprogressofthegiftedorganizedintogroups?Thereseemstobenoviablewaytoassesstheirprogress.(para11-12)
Thefactis,however,thatinavastmajorityofpilotstudiesthechildrenhavebeengroupedonlyaccordingtoIQscores,whicharefarfrom(being)reliable,andtheconclusionshavebeenbasedonachievementscoreswhichmeasureonlymasteryof11factualdetail.
然而,事實(shí)是,在絕大多數(shù)的試點(diǎn)研究中,孩子們只按智商高低分班,很不可靠,而結(jié)論又僅以掌握事實(shí)細(xì)節(jié)的分?jǐn)?shù)為基礎(chǔ)。
Unfortunately,therearenoreliabledevicesformeasuringgrowthinsuchareasascreativity,attitudes,personaladjustment,latentinterestandtalent,andinnatecapacity.(forthesefactorsarequitesubjective)不幸的是,在創(chuàng)造性、態(tài)度、自我調(diào)節(jié)能力、潛在的興趣和才能,以及天賦的能力等方面還沒有可靠的手段來衡量其長進(jìn)。acasteofintellectualsnobs:
agroupofstudentswhoconsiderthemselvessuperiortoothersbecauseoftheiroutstandingabilityandachievement,andspecialtreatmenttheyreceivefromtheteacher.iftheychallengeandsparkinterestsinyoungpeople:
iftheycalluponyoungpeopletoengageinacontestofskillandencourageorstimulatethemintogreateractivityTheteacher,notthe…individualdifferences. Itistheteacher,ratherthanthewaythattheclassesareformed,thatinfluencesthestudentsinhowtheylookatdifferencesinabilityamongthemselvesParaphrase
instill:put(ideas,feelings,etc.)intosomebody’smindgraduallybutfirmlybyacontinuouseffort逐漸灌輸(思想等)E.g.:Theyinstillasenseofresponsibilityin/intotheirchildren他們逐步培養(yǎng)(孩子的)責(zé)任感“Moralitymaybeinstilledintotheirminds“道德可以灌輸?shù)剿麄兊念^腦中Ihaveconfidence…interestsandabilities.
Iamconfidentthatifteachersareawareofindividualdifferencesandmotivateyoungpeopleindifferentways,thestudentswilldevel
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025委托加工承攬合同 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)版模板
- 2025監(jiān)控系統(tǒng)改造合同書
- 2025勞動合同續(xù)簽申請寫
- 統(tǒng)考版2024高考地理二輪復(fù)習(xí)課時(shí)作業(yè)十五選修3旅游地理含解析
- 2025轉(zhuǎn)口貿(mào)易合同范本
- 2025年泉州道路貨物運(yùn)輸從業(yè)資格證考試
- 2025勞動法單方面解除合同賠償
- 2025年怒江貨運(yùn)考試
- 2025年欽州貨運(yùn)上崗資格證模擬考試
- 2025長沙防水分包合同范本
- 2024年徐州市中考語文試卷(附答案解析)
- 公文寫作題庫(500道)
- 2023年《安徽大學(xué)學(xué)生手冊》在線考試學(xué)習(xí)通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
- 一封雞毛信的故事課件
- 變形桿菌實(shí)驗(yàn)活動風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估報(bào)告
- 養(yǎng)老服務(wù)與康復(fù)機(jī)構(gòu)作業(yè)指導(dǎo)書
- 五育并舉-勞以啟智動以潤心
- 2024年家裝家居行業(yè)解決方案-淘天集團(tuán)
- 人教版八年級上冊數(shù)學(xué)第三次月考試題
- 2024年新人教版七年級上冊生物課件 第三章 微生物 第一節(jié) 微生物的分布
- 創(chuàng)業(yè)基礎(chǔ)學(xué)習(xí)通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
評論
0/150
提交評論