翻譯文本描寫

翻譯文本描寫翻譯研究所廖七一1ContentsMajorpointsofDTSHypotheticalSchemeFromtheperspectiveoftranslationprocessFromNewmark’stenpullingsFromCrystalandDavid’sdimensionsFromliterarycriticismTheobjecttobedescribedApproachestodescription21.MajorpointsofDTS“Noempiricalsciencecanmakeaclaimforcompletenessand(relative)autonomyunlessithasaproperdescriptivebranch.”(Toury1995:1)Translationistherealcommunicativeeventsneithermoreorlessthanotherlinguisticeventsintheworld.3TypeofrelationshipCriterion(orTypeofcondition)AppropriateVerbsBranchofTranslationStudiespossibleTheoreticalCan(undercertaincircumstancesTranslationtheoryexistingempiricalisDTSrequiredAprioriShouldbeAppliedtranslationstudies41)EmpiricalDescriptivetranslationstudiesisto“describethephenomenaoftranslatingandtranslation(s)astheymanifestthemselvesintheworldofourexperience.”Translation(s)andtranslatingcouldbedescribedobjectively;atranslatorisamoderndoctor,insteadofawitch.52)Value-freeandimpartialityAtranslationistakentobe“anytarget-languageutterancewhichispresentedorregardedassuchwithinthetargetculture,onwhatevergrounds.”Translationistaken“asitis”,“whatatranslatoractuallydoes?”insteadof“itshouldbe”,or“whatatranslatorcando,orshoulddo”.63)systematicandglobalThefocusisnotpersonal,idiosyncraciesoranecdotalismbutsystematicism;notlocalbutglobal,notaparticularpieceofwritingbutacorpusoftranslatedtexts.74)TargettextorientedThetranslatorsoperatefirstandforemostintheinterestofthecultureintowhichtheyaretranslating,andnotintheinterestofthesourcetext,letalonethesourceculture.DTSshouldstartfromthehypothesisthattranslationsarefactsofonesystemonly:thetargetsystem.8Descriptivetranslationstudiesisatarget-orienteddisciplineconsistingof“carefullyperformedstudiesintowell-definedcorpusesorsetsofproblems.”(Toury1995:1)95)FunctionsDTSconstitutesthebestmansoftesting,refuting,andespeciallymodifyingandamendingtheverytheory…toexaminesuchareasasdecision-making,translationnormsthethirdcodeanduniversalsoftranslation.102.HypotheticalSchemeauthor1text1Reader1Author2text2reader2Author1’Text1’Reader1’Author2’Text2’Reader2’(Literary)System1(Literary)System2≌11Allrelationsintheschemedeservetobestudied:T1—T2(theoriginalanditstranslation)A1—A2(betweenauthors)R1—R2(betweenreaders)12A1-T1A2-T2(authorialintentionsinthesourceandtargetsystems,andtheircorrelation)T1-R1T2-R2(pragmaticsandreceptioninthesourceandtargetsystems,andtheircorrelation)A1-A1’,A2-A2’(situationoftheauthorinrespectofotherauthors,inbothsystems)≌≌13T1-T1’,T2-T2’(situationofboththeoriginalandthetranslationastextsinrespectofothertexts.)R1-R1’,R2-R2’(situationofthereaderwithintherespectivesystems)(Literary)System1--(Literary)

System2)(relations,whetherintermsofconflictorharmony,betweenbothsystems)14Thetextcomparisonwillleadtoquestionslike:1.DoestranslatorYalwaystranslateaccordingtotheserules?Ifnot,canweexplaintheexceptions?2.Doeshewritehisown“creative”workaccordingtothesamerules?Ifnot,why?3.Doeshe,inhis“creative”workorinhistranslations,behaveinthesamemannerashisfellowtranslators?154.Doesheshowaconsciousawarenessofrules,norms,models?Doeshetheorizeaboutthem?Ifso,arethereanyconflictsbetweenhistheoryandpractice,orbetweenhisowntheoriesandthoseofothers?Onwhichpoints?165.Ishisworkasatranslatormoreinnovatory,orlessso,thanhis“creative”writing?6.Arethereanyconflictsbetweenthetranslationalnormsandthenormsandexpectationsofthereceptororaudience(critics,readers)?17STTTATDETTCATTNCRDescriptivebasisofevaluationEvaluativemomentCriticalmomentST,TT=sourcetext,targettextAT=adequatetranslationDE/TT=descriptionofthetargettextN/CR=normofthetranslationcriticCA/TT=criticalaccountofthetargettext(review)comparison18原作者

3.Fromtranslationprocess1原文文本

2譯者

3贊助人

45譯文文本

6讀者7翻譯策略

19一、原作者性別、國別、民族、教育程度、政治傾向、藝術(shù)觀、年齡、語言（母語）20二、原文本1、文類（genre）：長篇小說、短篇小說、散文、詩歌（具體分類）、戲劇、兒童文學(xué)2、描寫內(nèi)容：政治、愛情、現(xiàn)實(shí)主義、浪漫主義、超驗(yàn)主義3、出版信息：發(fā)表年代、刊載期刊、出版社、發(fā)行量、接受、傳播、影響等21文體特征1、語言：平實(shí)、優(yōu)美、艱深；詞頻、方言（階級與地域）、個性語言、正式程度、口語與非口語化傾向、句子結(jié)構(gòu)（類型）、句子平均長度2、文體類型：敘述、描述、說明、譯論；3、功能類型：表情、信息、呼喚、美學(xué)、元語言22三、譯者外語教育背景、外語水平、翻譯經(jīng)驗(yàn)、翻譯成就、翻譯思想、翻譯動機(jī)、翻譯過程23四、贊助人翻譯指令、贊助形式、贊助額度、與譯者關(guān)系、社會聲譽(yù)、體制內(nèi)地位、與主流意識形態(tài)的關(guān)系24五、譯文文本所根據(jù)的原文本版本、與原文本的差異（語言、類型、功能）、與本土原創(chuàng)文的關(guān)系、出版過程、發(fā)行數(shù)量、接受與傳播25六、譯文讀者讀者群體、教育程度、接受習(xí)慣、審美情趣、經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況、政治地位、閱讀目的26七、翻譯策略直譯、意譯、改寫、節(jié)譯……翻譯單位、句子結(jié)構(gòu)（長短、繁復(fù)、對仗）、語言表達(dá)形式（白話、文言、古奧、淺白、儒雅、方言）、對等類型、文化負(fù)載詞匯處理、修辭格的表現(xiàn)、文本形式的傳譯274.DescriptiveMethods什么才算得上真正的、地道的文本分析和描述呢？簡單地說，一定要從文本的表層深入到文本的深層，從而發(fā)現(xiàn)那些不能為普通閱讀所把握的深層意義。以下是幾種主要的描述方法：281、“新批評”，“新批評”的方法很基礎(chǔ)，但也很實(shí)用，即從文本中“細(xì)讀”出那些語言的非日?；\(yùn)用，如“反諷”、“張力”等?！凹?xì)讀”現(xiàn)在已成為包括各種文本分析在內(nèi)的一個基本功。“新批評”對詩與短篇小說等文本的分析，特別有用。對于長篇小說則要結(jié)合敘述學(xué)的分析才容易提綱挈領(lǐng)。292、敘述學(xué)的分析方法，主要是故事分析（包括故事序列分析，故事類型分析等等），與敘述視角分析（包括敘述者的人稱、位置、可信度；敘述者的聲音、敘述的速度等）。當(dāng)然，敘述學(xué)也同樣關(guān)注人物的話語分析，看他說的話是直接引語還是間接引語，亦或是自由間接引語。因?yàn)閿⑹鰧W(xué)、符號學(xué)等都是建立在語言學(xué)基礎(chǔ)上的，所以分析一篇小說就猶如分析一個句子，人物相當(dāng)于主語，人物的行動相當(dāng)于謂語，而人物的品質(zhì)則相當(dāng)于定語或狀語。303、符號學(xué)，符號學(xué)其實(shí)是個相當(dāng)寬泛的概念，這里僅指最為經(jīng)典也最常用的符號學(xué)分析方法，也就是格雷馬斯的方法，主要包括矩陣分析和施動者分析等。當(dāng)然，羅蘭·巴特、托多羅夫等人還有其他的許多方法，但原理基本上都是一樣的。所謂“結(jié)構(gòu)主義”的分析方法，基本上也就是這些方法。314、解構(gòu)主義的方法，代表人物是法國人德里達(dá)和美國人德·曼。解構(gòu)主義的一個基本原則就是從文本的邊緣進(jìn)入，從而顛覆掉整個文本的通常意義。325、互文、對話理論分析。此方法起源于巴赫金，成熟于托多羅夫、克里斯特娃、熱奈特等。結(jié)構(gòu)主義一直視文本為相對封閉的系統(tǒng)，從而忽視了現(xiàn)實(shí)和社會的因素，而傳統(tǒng)批評又只看到了社會忽略了文本，各有弊端?；ノ?、對話理論的出現(xiàn)則很好地解決了這一問題，因?yàn)槲谋九c現(xiàn)實(shí)社會之間被視為是互為文本的，是對話關(guān)系的，于是社會的因素與文本的規(guī)則都被分析到了。336、文化研究。從傳統(tǒng)文學(xué)批評到現(xiàn)代文學(xué)批評，史稱“語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”，而文學(xué)批評向大眾文化批評的轉(zhuǎn)向，史稱“文化轉(zhuǎn)向”或“意識形態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)向”。首先文化研究將以往文學(xué)研究的研究對象和研究視野大大地拓展，以前只研究所謂的經(jīng)典文本，而文化研究則更針對當(dāng)代消費(fèi)社會的當(dāng)下語境，將大眾文化（包括電視、廣告、娛樂等等）也納入了研究的范圍。其次就是特別注重意識形態(tài)分析，葛蘭西、阿爾圖塞等人的理論有著舉足輕重的位置。349.Themoralandthefactualtruth1.SLwriter5.TLreadership2.SLnorms6.TLnorms3.SLcultureTEXT7.TLculture4.SLsetting8.TLsettingandtraditionandtradition10.Thetranslator5.PeterNewmark’stendirections351.TheindividualstyleoridiolectoftheSLauthor.Whenshoulditbea)preserved;b)normalized?2.Theconventionalgrammaticalandlexicalusageforthistypeoftext,dependingonthetopicandthesituation.3.ContentitemsreferringspecificallytotheSL,orthirdlanguage(i.e..NotSLorTL)cultures.4.Thetypicalformatofatextinabook,periodical,newspaper,etc.,asinfluencedbytraditionatthetime.365.Theexpectationsoftheputativereadership,bearinginmindtheirestimatedknowledgeofthetopicandthestyleoflanguagetheyuse,expressedintermsofthelargestcommonfactor,sinceoneshouldnottranslatedown(orup)tothereadership.6.7.8Asfor2,3,and4respectively,butrelatedtotheTL.7.Whatisbeingdescribedorreported,ascertainedorverified(thereferentialtruth),wherepossibleindependentlyoftheSLtextandtheexpectationsofthereadership.378.Theviewsandprejudicesofthetranslator,whichmaybepersonalandsubjective,ormaybesocialandcultural,involvingthetranslator'sgrouployaltyfactor,whichmayreflectthenational,political,ethnic,religious,socialclass,sex,etc.assumptionsofthetranslator.381.Individuality:Inunselfconsciousutterance,certainfeaturesoccur—relativelypermanentfeaturesofthespeechorwritinghabits—whichidentifysomeoneasaspecificperson,distinguishhimfromotherusersofthesamelanguage,orthesamevarietyofthelanguage.2.Dialect:Otherfeaturesinaperson'susagewillgiveanindicationofhisplaceorgeographicalorigin(regionaldialect)orhislocationonanon-linguisticallybasedsocialscale.6.D.CrystalandD.Davy’sdimensions393.Time:Anotherfamiliardimensionofdescriptioncoversthosefeaturesofanutterance,whichindicateexclusivelydiachronicinformation—thetemporalprovenanceofapieceoflanguage.4.Discourse:Medium(speech,writing)/participation(monologue,dialogue)5.Province:Featuresoflanguagethatidentifyanutterancewiththosevariablesinanextra-linguisticcontextwhicharedefinedwithreferencetothekindofoccupationalorprofessionalactivitybeingengagedin.406.Status:Thesystematiclinguisticvariationswhichcorrespondwithvariationsintherelativesocialstandingoftheparticipantsinanyactofcommunication,regardlessoftheirexactlocality.a)Contractsbetweenpeoplefromdifferentpositionsonasocialscale;b)degreeofformality—frozen,formal,consultative,casualandintimate.417.Modality:Linguisticfeaturescorrelatablewiththespecificpurposeofanutterancewhichhasledtheusertoadoptonefeatureorsetoffeaturesratherthananother,andultimatelytoproduceanoverall,conventionalizedspokenorwrittenformatforhislanguage.8.Singularity:Occasionalidiosyncraticlinguisticfeatures,whichgiveaspecificeffectwithintheframeworkofsomeconventionalvarietyinaperson'sutterance.427.FromliterarycriticismThejobofthecriticistofindoutwhattheauthoristryingtoexpressandwhetherornothesucceededindoingso,andthentoexpresswhathethinksandfeelsaboutthebook.Thefocusofdescriptionwillvarywiththetypeofbookunderconsideration,andnodescriptionwillattempttocovereverypossibledetail,butratherconcentrateonprovingthreeorfourspecificpointsaboutthework.Somefocusesofdifferentgenresare:43Fiction(includingplays)a)setting(time,place,atmosphere)b)plotc)effectivescenesd)characterse)themesandideasf)conflict,suspenseandclimaxg)clearnessandeffectivenessofstyleh)useofspecifictechniques(humor,imagery)i)reasonsforlikingordislikingthebookj)comparisonswithotherbooks44Poetrya)mostoftheaboveplusb)sound(rhyme,rhythm,diction)c)emotivevalue(moodandfeeling)d)originalityofideae)particularlymemorablelines45Thethreebasicquestionsofthereviewer1.Whatwasthepurposethattheauthorwastryingtoaccomplish?2.Wasthispurposeworthwhile?3.Didheachievehispurpose?Ifso,howwasitdone?46OZYMANDIAS–PercyByssheShelleyImetatravelerfromanantiquelandWhosaid:TwovastandtrunklesslegsofstoneStandinthedesert...Nearthem,onthesand,Halfsunk,ashatteredvisagelies,whosefrownAndwrinkledlip,andsneerofcoldcommandTellthatitssculptorwellthosepassionsreadWhichyetsurvive,stampedontheselifelessthingsThehandthatmockedthemandtheheartthatfed;Andonthepedestalthesewordsappear;"MynameisOzymandias,KingofKings:Lookonmyworks,yeMighty,anddespair!"Nothingbesideremains,RoundthedecayOfthatcolossalwreck,boundlessandbareTheloneandlevelsandsstretchfaraway.47ThestrongestaspectofromanticismwhichiscontainedinOzymandiasistheturningbacktothepast.ThepoemitselfisbasedonastoryrecountedbyDiordorusSioulus,aGreekhistorianofthefirstcenturyA.D.HereportedthatthestatuswasofOzymandias(itwasactuallyoftheEgyptianpharaohRamsesII)andthatitwasthelargestinEgypt.Itwassaidtobeartheinscription;"IamOzymandias,KingofKings.IfanymanwishestoknowwhoIamandwhereIamburied,lethimsurpassmeinsomeofmyachievements."48Shelleyusesthestorytoemphasizehowfutileandvainsuchsentimentactuallyis.Thereisastrongironyinthefactthataonce-powerfulkingisnowonlyrememberedbypasserbysinthebarrendesertwhohaphazardlyviewthiscrumbling,brokendownrelics.Hisoncemightyaccomplishmentshaveliterallyturnedtodust,fadedfrommemorywiththepassageoftime.49Thepoemisalsoromanticintheimagerythattheauthorem-ploys.Byusingthe"antiqueland"ofEgyptasasetting.