【哈佛商業(yè)評(píng)論】為什么微軟要衡量員工的繁榮而不是參與度_第1頁
【哈佛商業(yè)評(píng)論】為什么微軟要衡量員工的繁榮而不是參與度_第2頁
【哈佛商業(yè)評(píng)論】為什么微軟要衡量員工的繁榮而不是參與度_第3頁
【哈佛商業(yè)評(píng)論】為什么微軟要衡量員工的繁榮而不是參與度_第4頁
【哈佛商業(yè)評(píng)論】為什么微軟要衡量員工的繁榮而不是參與度_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩5頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

AnalyticsAndDataScienceWhyMicrosoftMeasuresEmployeeThriving,NotEngagementbyDawnKlinghofferandElizabethMcCuneJune24,2022FrancescoCartafotografo/GettyImagesSummary.Asthepandemiccontinuesandmanypeopleworkhybridschedules,peopleanalyticsresearchersatMicrosoftrealizedtheyneededtomovefrommeasuringemployeeengagementtomeasuringemployeethriving.Deinedas“tobeenergizedand...moreOnethingisclear:Noneofusarethesamepeopletodayaswewerepriorto2020.So,asouremployeeschange,thewayswecanbestempowerthemneedtoevolve,too.AtMicrosoft,whereweworkonthePeopleAnalyticsteam,thatmeanslearningwhatthedatacantellusabouthowouremployeesaspiretolivetheirlivesmeaningfully.Inparticular,welandedonanewwayofmeasuringthriving,atbothworkandoutsideofit,thatgoesbeyondengagementonly.Inthisarticle,wesharehowandwhywecametothismeasurement—andhowyourowncompanycanlearnfromourexperiences.WhyThrivingIstheNewNorthStarPriortothisyear,weconductedonelengthy,annualsurveythattrackedemployeeengagement.Itoftentookmonthstodigestandplanactionsaround.Yet,weconsistentlyencounteredchallengesinbuildingashareddefinitionofengagementacrossthecompany.Andoften,despiteemployeeengagementscoresthatwouldseemtoindicatethatthingsweregoingwell,itbecameclearthatemployeeswerestrugglingwhenwediveddeeperintotheresponses.Tous,thiswasareflectionthatwehadn’tyetsetahighenoughbarfortheemployeeexperience,anditmotivatedustodobetterinmeasuringwhatmatters.So,westartedaskingemployeesforfeedbackthroughashorteryetmorefocusedsurveyeverysixmonths,forwhichwepartneredwithemployeesuccessplatformGlint.Thisnewapproachishelpingusstayclosertoemployees’feedbackandtakeclearerandmoreimmediateactioninresponse.Wealsosoughttodefineanew,higherbarthatwentbeyondengagementonly,drawinginspirationfrommanysources.OnewaswhatOurChiefPeopleOfficer,KathleenHogan,calls“The5P’s.”SimilartoMaslow’sHierarchy,itbreaksdownemployeefulfillmentintofivekey,successivecomponents:pay,perks,people,pride,andpurpose.Inatimethathaspromptedmanytoreflectontheroleofworkandcareerintheirlives,itfeltcriticaltorecalibrateourlisteningsystemstomeasureourprogresstowardsthatendgoal—asenseofpurpose.WewerealsoinspiredbyRossSchoolofBusiness’sGretchenSpreitzerandcolleagues’researchonthrivingastheantidotetolanguishing.Aswemovedbeyondemployeeengagement,wedecidedtofocusonourownversionofemployeethriving.AtMicrosoft,wedefinethrivingas“tobeenergizedandempoweredtodomeaningfulwork.”Thisisthenewcoreaspirationwehaveforouremployees,onethatchallengesustopushourselveseverydaysoeveryemployeecanfeelthey’repursuingthatsenseofpurpose.Ourfocusonthrivingisn’tjustaboutrecoveringfromtheimpactofthepandemicormatchingpre-Covidemployeesentimentscores.It’saboutcomingouttheothersideanddoingevenbetter.WhatItLooksLiketoThriveWhenourfirstemployeesurveydatacamebackearlierthisyear,webeganbenchmarkingourthrivingforthefirsttime.Welookedatnotjusthowmanypeoplereportedtheywerethriving,butcalculatedcompany-wideaveragesbasedonresponsesfromafive-pointscale—ifanemployeeselected“stronglydisagree,”thattranslatedtoanindividualscoreofzero,and“stronglyagree”wouldbetheequivalentofa100.Thisensuredourinsightstookintoaccountallpositive,negative,andneutralsentiment.Afteranalyzingtheresults,wefoundthatthrivingaverageda77acrossthecompany—anumberweseeasstrong,butonewecanstillworkon.Whenwebrokedownthrivingintoitsthreecomponents,wesawthatmeaningfulwork(79)andempowerment(79)bothscoredhigheramongemployeesthanenergized(73).Tounderstandtheemployeeexperiencesbehindthenumbers,wedoveintotheopen-endedsurveyresponses.Threekeythemesstoodout.Culturematters.Whatwesawwasthatemployeeswhowerethrivingandnotthrivingwerebothtalkingaboutculture,butinvastlydifferentways.Thrivingemployeestalkedaboutacollaborativeenvironmentandteamworkwithcolleagues,aninclusiveculturewithautonomyandflexibility,andwell-beingsupport.Thesecommentsreferenceexamplessuchasbeingabletohavehonest,non-judgmentalconversationsondifficulttopics,withafocusonfindingsolutions.Employeeswhoweren’tthrivingtalkedaboutexperiencingsiloes,bureaucracy,andalackofcollaboration.Inthesecommentswehearalackofagencyandasenseforbeingacoginamachine.Inotherwords,theoppositeofbeingempoweredandenergizedtodomeaningfulwork.Thrivingtakesavillage.Divingdeeperintothenumbers,it’sclearthateveryonehasaroletoplay.AtMicrosoft,we’velongstudiedimportanceofmanagers,andweknowtheirrolehasbeenmorecrucialthaneverastheyhelpedtheirteamsnavigatethroughuncertainty.It’shearteningtoseeourmanagersshineduringsuchadifficulttime.“Mymanagertreatsmewithdignityandrespect”scoreda93,meaningalmosteveryemployeeselected“stronglyagree”—butthisalsomeanswestillneedtoensurethat’stheexperienceforeverysingleemployee.Wealsosawhighscoresinconfidenceinmanager’seffectiveness(87)andmanagers’supportforcareers(85),showingstrongsentimentthatmanagersarehelpingtheirteamssucceedatthecompany.Whileweseethesescoresasstrengths,they’restrengthswewanttokeepbuildingtoensureapositivelivedexperienceforallemployees.Thrivingandwork-lifebalancearenotthesamething.Aswethinkabouthowtosupportthriving,it’simportanttodistinguishitfromwork-lifebalance.Whilethrivingisfocusedonbeingenergizedandempoweredtodomeaningfulworkinyourrole,work-lifebalancereflectsemployees’personallives,too.Employeesratedtheirsatisfactionwithwork-lifebalanceasa71,andwhileit’sencouragingtoseework-lifebalanceimproving,ithasn’tfullyrecoveredyettopre-Covidlevels.Andtherearetimeswhenthrivingandwork-lifebalancecanmoveindifferentdirections.Forexample,anearly-in-careeremployeewhofeelsunderutilizedintheirrolemayhavegreatwork-lifebalancefromaperspectiveofhoursandworkload,butnotfeelenergizedwhilethey’reatworkorinspiredbythemeaningandimpactofwhatthey’reworkingon.Ontheotherhand,therearetimeswhenpeoplecanthriveandfeelsofulfilledbythehardworkittakestomakeprogressonabigprojectthattheycanmakeashort-termtradeoffonwork-lifebalance.Weknowthatwork-lifebalancemayebbandflow,butwantedtolearnfromemployeeswhobothratedtheirwork-lifebalancehighlyandsaidtheywerethrivinginthatwork-focusedportionoftheirlife.So,wecomparedthe56%ofouremployeeswhosaidtheywerethrivingandreportedhigherwork-lifebalancetothe16%whowerethrivingbuthadlowerwork-lifebalancescores.Bycombiningsentimentdatawithde-identifiedcalendarandemailmetadata,wefoundthatthosewiththebestofbothworldshadfivefewerhoursintheirworkweekspan,fivefewercollaborationhours,threemorefocushours,and17feweremployeesintheirinternalnetworksize.Thisreinforceswhatweknowfromearlierwork-lifebalanceresearchandnetworksizeanalysis,whichshowedusthatincreasedcollaborationdoeshaveanegativeimpactonemployees’perceptionofwork-lifebalance.Italsoconfirmsthatcollaborationisnotinherentlybad—formanyemployees,thosetimesofcloseteamworkandstrivingtowardacommongoalcanfuelthriving.However,itisimportanttobemindfulofhowintensecollaborationcanimpactwork-lifebalance,andleadersandemployeesalikeshouldguardagainstthatintensitybecoming24/7.ChallengesforThrivingontheRoadAheadAsmoreandmorecompanieslookcloselyathowtheylistentoandhelptheiremployees,it’simportanttospendtimeunderstandingwhatyournorthstaris—andtomakesureit’sconnectedtotheoutcomesyouaretryingtodriveasanorganization.Thisneweraofhybridworkwon’tworkforemployeesifyou’renotlistening—orifwhatyou’relisteningfordoesn’tevolvealongwiththemandhowtheydotheirjobs.Thereisn’tasingularone-size-fits-allsolutionoutthere,butpayingcloseattentiontohowyouremployeesthriveisonepathforward.Weknowthisisjustthebeginningofourjourneytounderstandthisinourownorganization.Lookingholisticallyatthewrittenresponsesfromthosewhoweren’tthrivingoffersmorecluesaboutwhereelsewecanimproveforouremployees.Forexample,whileemployeesscored“Ifeelincludedinmyteam”highlyat86,byfarthemostcommonthreadamongthosewhowerenotthrivingwasafeelingofexclusion—fromalackofcollaborationtofeelingleftoutofdecisionstostrugglingwithpoliticsandbureaucracy.We’llcontinuetofocusonensuringinclusionisfeltaspartofourcultureacrossallteamsandorgs.Ultimately,everyscore,whetherhighorlow,g

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論