版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
actual,
Thereal,
noBS
rk
worktogether,regardless
ofwheretheywork.
happywithhowthey
Previouspages:
AIgeneratedrendering
ofatypicalmodern
workplace,circa2024.
Introduction
T
eams—thefoundationalunitoftheenterprise—havebeenputthroughthewringer.First,
theyweresenthome“temporarily.”Then,thetemporarybecamethe“newnormal.”Then,theyweretoldtheycouldcomebackwhen/iftheyfeltcomfortable.Andthen,theywerejust
forcedtocomeback,whethertheylikeditornot.Today,somehavetoworkin-office,othersgettochoose,andstillothers
don’tevenhaveofficestogointo,spendingtheirdaysina
weirddigitalnetherspacewhereonlyonepersoncancom-fortablyspeakatanygivenmomentandeveryoneistrappedinsidelittlerectangles.
Nearlyfouryearsoutfromthattime,wewantedtoknow
howteamswereholdingup.Wesurveyed1,000knowledgeworkerstodoatemperaturecheckonthecurrentstate
ofteamwork.And,shocker:yearsofbackandforthwith
noconsistentstructureforhowtoworktogetherhasreallytakenatoll.
workersaren’tvery
Mostknowledge
1
Wleahvyerkers
Where
famielgs
Whatworkers
2
need(p44)
Introduction
66%ofworkerssaythey’reonly“somewhathappy,”orworse,nothappyatall.Nearlyathirdregularlyexperiencehiccupswiththeirteamorstruggletoworkwelltogether—insomecases,astruggletheymayneverovercome.Overhalfof
knowledgeworkerssaypoorteamworkhasledtoemployeeburnout,while45%sayithasledtoemployeeturnover.
Thisisjustthetipoftheiceberg.Inthisreport,we’llshareourfindingsonsomeofthebiggestissuesfacingteamsintheenterprise:
?Ispoorteamworkreallythatbigofadeal?(Hint:Yes.)
?Whatarethebarrierstogoodteamwork?
?Shouldn’tbeingremotemakeworkeasier?
?Whyaren’tmeetingsdoingtheirjob?
?Howmightwesolveforpoorteamwork?
?Justwhatexactlyarewedoinghere,people?
Let’sgettheconversationstartedaroundwhatmight
needtochangetogetteamworkinfightingshapeagain.‘Causeifteamscan’tworktogether,thentheenterprisejustcan’twork.
3
4
5
Image:Freepik
Isburnout
cin?
Whyworkersleave
6
7
Thewaywe’reworkingisn’tworking...andknowledgeworkersknowit.Ifyoudon’tfixbrokenteamwork,yourteam'sliabletoleaveyouinarealfix.
Why
ers
8
9
Newsflash:yourcoworkers
arelookingforabetterdeal.
Duetobadteamwork,
nearly3in5knowledge
workershaveactively
thoughtaboutleaving
theircurrentpositions
oralreadyapplied
fornewjobs.
Whyworkersleave
Whenteamworkstrugglesareignored…
52%
45%
ofworkers
haveexperiencedburnout
ofworkers
haveexperiencedturnover
Noonewantstoplayforalosingteam,andif
teamworkchallengesaren’taddressed,your
starplayersmightnotmakeittonextseason.
(Wepromise,that’sthelastsportsmetaphor.)
Ariddle:whichteamislessproductive—one
fullofworkerswhohatetheirjobsoronethat
doesn’texistbecauseeveryoneisgone?
Timeisoftheessence.
63
10
Whyworkersleave
ofknowledge
workersareeyeing
theexitwhenthey
haven’tseen
teamworkimprove
inthepastyear.
Workersaren’tgoingtowaitaround
foreverforcompaniestogettheiracts
together.Ifteamworkain’timprovin’,
they’regonnagetmovin’.
11
1213
teamisbusy
anotherjob,
howmuch
actually,
uh,lead?
leadership
lookingfor
they
ofyour
Ifonequarter
Whyworkersleave
38%ofnon-managementemployees
havethoughtaboutquittingduetopoorteamwork.Andifthat’snotenough,25%ofseniorexecutiveshavealreadyappliedforotherjobs.
14
15
Whyworkersleave
Thecost
ork?
52%sayemployeeburnout45%sayemployeeturnover31%saymissedgoals
30%saymisseddeadlines18%saylostbusiness
Translation:ifyoudon’t
supportyourteams,yourcompany’sgoingtosuffer.
Whyworkersleave
16
17
anymore!
Poorteamworkismorelikelytocause
burnoutforwomenthanmen.
56%
ofwomenexperienceburnout
duetopoorteamwork.
49%
ofmenexperienceburnout
duetopoorteamwork.
Typical.
Burnout:
workers
lodtejst
Infact,55%ofemployeesunder40say
they’veexperiencedburnout...ascompared
to49%ofemployees40andover.Sogreat
newsifyou’reabouttoturn40—there’s6%
lessburnoutinyourfuture!
Whyworkersleave
1819
Ineffective
teamwork
Turnover
&burnout
It’stheciiiircleofwork:badteamworkleadstoturnoverandburnout,andturnoverandburnoutleadtobadteamwork.
Nearlyhalfofknowledgeworkerssaythatburnoutisa
roadblocktoeffectivecollaboration,followedbyalackof
staffandthenumberofmeetingsheld.Unclearprioritiesandexpectationsalsostandintheway.
Asaresult,burnoutandturnover,whichbothcause
ineffectiveteamwork,arealsotheleadingoutcomes
ofit.Thiscreatesanongoingcycleofpoorcollaborationacrossorganizations.
42%
31%
29%
28%
26%
24%
Employee
Burnout
Lack
ofStaff
NumberofMeetings
Unclear
Priorities&Expectations
Ineffective
Toolsor
Software
WorkCulture
Whyworkersleave
20
21
an,
everything?
to
49%
ofremoteworkerssayteamwork
hasdeclinedorremainedthesame,
ascomparedtoin-officeworkers
(46%)andhybridworkers(40%).
Afraidnot.57%ofremoteworkersarenot
veryhappywithhowtheirteamswork.
Whereverworkerssit,teamshavetobe
supportedtofeelproductive—otherwise
they’rejusttreadingthesamewaterina
differentpond.
Sookay,maybethiswholeremotething
isn’tquitefiguredoutafterall.
’s
myteam?
22
Whyworkersleave
“Lackofstaff”iscited
asamajorcause
ofpoorteamworkamong
ofin-officeworkers
37%
29%
24%
ofhybridworkers
ofremoteworkers
Weknowhowitgoes…youwerehired
tobeadesignerandnowyou’realso
inchargeofproductmarketing,sales,
andcleaningthebathrooms.It’shardto
havegreatteamworkwhenyou’rethe
onlyoneleftontheteam.
23
Whydobad
s
togood
people?
24
Wheremeetingsfail
26
27
Where
meet-
ingsfail
OMG,wehavetostop
meetinglikethis!
No,seriously.Wehave
tostopmeetinglikethis.
2829
71%
workers
ofknowledge
believe
arenotthe
meetings
bestway
tocollaborate
onwork.
andalign
Wheremeetingsfail
Thenumbersdon’tlie:peoplearereallysickofmeetings.Butistheproblem
meetingsthemselvesortheway
they’rebeingrun?Orboth?
30
31
Around1in5
knowledge
workersspends
11+
hours
aweek
inmeetings,
including36%
ofseniorexecutives.
Honestly,it’smaybemoresurprisingtolearn
that64%ofseniorexecutivesspendless
than11hourperweek.Haveyouseenthese
people’scalendars?
Wheremeetingsfail
Averagehoursspent
inmeetingsperweek:
Remoteworkers
7.6
7.9Hybridworkers
In-officeworkers
5.3
Justaheadsup:ifthisdataisconvincingyou
thatback-to-officeisthesolution,remember
thosetwohoursyouaren’tsittinginmeet-
ingsaremorethanmadeupforbythehours
you’resittingintraffic.
50%
50%
32
Wheremeetingsfail
Onaverage,workers
believeonlyabouthalf
oftheirmeetings
areimportant.
Evenworse,asizablenumberofmid-level
andnon-managementemployees(about
1in4)estimatethatlessthan20%oftheir
meetingsareproductive,comparedtoabout
one-eighthofseniorexecutives.Whenthe
personatthetopissaying“thatmeeting
wasproductive”andeveryonebelowthem
disagrees,something’samiss.
33
Wheremeetingsfail
34
35
“Company-wide
meetings?”
Biggestwaste
oftime.
Whichmeetingsaretheworst?
Around2in5knowledgeworkers
rankcompany-widemeetingsas
thebiggestwasteoftime.
Wasteoftime?Really?Whenelseare
yousupposedtocatchuponemails?
Accordingtoknowledgeworkers,
thebiggestsignsthatameeting
isgoingtobeawasteoftimeare:
People
havingside
conversations
Lack
ofagenda
42%
42%
People
multitasking
41%
Lackof
participation
39%
Andifallfourofthosefactorsarepresent,
that’swhatwecalla“Yahtzee!”
Wheremeetingsfail
36
37
28%
ofmeetingownersdon’tfeel
fullypreparedtorunmeetings.
Anditallboilsdowntoanawfullotoftimewastedandanawfullotof…
awkward…
silences.
Andthisisonyou,managers,sinceyoumake
up88%ofthemeetingownerpopulation.
Butdon’tgettoococky,individualcontrib-
utors—25%ofmeetingattendeessay
theirlackofparticipationderailsmeetings.
Whichwouldmakethemmorelikeindividual
non-contributors,really.
Are
meetings
themost
ve
alignand
collaborate?
38
Wheremeetingsfail
NO
82%ofnon-managementknowledgeworkers
agree—meetingsarenotthemosteffectiveway
toalignandcollaborate.Mid-levelknowledge
workersandseniorexecslikethemalittlemore
…only2outof3thinkmeetingsareineffective.
Still,thoseresultsareprettystaggering…large
majoritiesofpeopleatalllevelsoftheenterprise
thinkmeetingsareawasteoftime.Howdowe
fixthispredicament?
Let’shaveameetingaboutit!;-)
39
Soyes,there’salotgoingwrong.Butwhat
doknowledgeworkerswant?Insteadof
focusingonthethingsthatdon’twork,
whatcouldwebedoingbetter?
“Movefastandbreakthings”hasbeen
arallyingcryforawhilenow,andguess
what?Theydidit.Thingsarebroken.
Solet’s
d
40
.
Wheremeetingsfail
Let’s
move
smart
41
andfix
things
Whatif
Monday
of
theweek?
4243
4445
Whatworkersneed
What
ers
It’snotalldoomandgloom.Workersknowwhattheywant.Leaders,areyou
listening?
Whatworkersneed
4647
Wherecouldweimprove?
Let’sstartwithwork/lifebalance.
Slicedanotherway,whohas
thebestwork/lifebalance?
41%
33%
ofmanagerswant
abetterwork/life
balance.
ofIndividual
contributorswant
abetterwork/life
balance.
66%63%
60%
Remote
workers
In-office
workers
Hybrid
workers
Managersmightgetalotoftheblame,
butthey’realsotakingonalotofthe
stress.Buildingaworkculturethat
takestheburdenoffofmanagerscould
havearippleeffectthatimpactsthe
entireorganizationforthebetter.
Notsurprisingly,remoteworkersare
feelingthebestabouttheirwork/life
balance.Butthat’sstillabigpercentage
oftheworkforcethat’sfeelingoverworked
andunder-rested—especiallyinaworld
wheregoingtothedentistorpicking
yourkidsupfromschoolisputinthe
“l(fā)ife”category.
CouldAIbetheanswer?
Nearly3in5
knowledgeworkers
areoptimisticAIwill
improveteamwork.
Thatincludes27%
whosaythey’revery
optimistic.
NowthatthehypeandfeararoundAIhavestartedtodiedown,workersarerealizingit’smorelikelytobringustogetherthan
tearusapart.Evenifthatmeanscomingtogethertofighttherobotuprising,westillconsideritawinforhumanity.
48
Whatworkersneed
ManagersthinkAIcan
helptheirteamsby
improvingknowledge
anddatasharing(50%)
andreducingrepetitive
tasksandautomating
processes(49%).
ManagersareputtingalotofhopeinAIasa
potentialsolutiontotheproblemstheirteam
areencountering.Anditcouldbe—ifused
properly—notasareplacementforhuman
workers,butasanenhancement.IfSkyNet
hastaughtusanything,it’sthatyoucan’tjust
pointAIataproblemandexpectittobefixed.
Lastingsolutionstakecare,understanding,
49
andquiteabitofveryconfusingtimetravel.
5051
Gartnerpredicts
thesocial
andcollaborationsoftware
marketwillgrowfrom
$3.5billionin2019to
$6.9
billion
in2024.
Greatnewsforpeoplewhomakecollaboration
software(looksaroundroomsheepishly),but
clearlycompaniesunderstandbrokenteam-
workisagrowingproblemandthey’relooking
forwaystofixit.
Whatworkersneed
Andyet1in3
knowledge
workershaveseen
nochangeinhow
theirteamswork
togetheroverthe
pastyear,andover
1in10haveseen
adecline.
Sojustthrowingmoneyatsoftware
isn’ttheanswer...ithastobetheright
softwarewiththerightfeatures(looks
aroundtheroomsheepishly,again),as
wellasaclearplanforimplementation
andtraining.
63
52
Whatworkersneed
ofindividual
contributorsthink
managersshould
helptheirteamslearncollaborationskills.
Accordingtoour
2023Collaboration
TrendsReport
,amajorityofworkersbelievemanagersshouldhelptheir
teamslearnhowtocollaboratebetter.
Andstrong
collaborationskills
canmakeabig
difference,because…
53
Knowledgeworkers
whoareintentional
withcollaboration
arenearly
2x
aslikelytosaythey’re
happywithhowtheir
teamcollaborates
thanthosewho
don’tcollaborate
intentionally.
54
Whatworkersneed
Ifthere’ssuchathingas“onesimpletrick!”
tofixingbrokenteamwork,it’sthis:
intentionality.
Whenpeoplecollaboratewithpurpose,theyenjoyworkmoreandhavebetterresults.Whyleaveteamworkuptofatewhenputtingintheefforttobuildyourteamworkpracticescandoubleyourchanceofsuccess?
55
Whatworkersneed
5657
wayswe
canfix
teamwork?
Moretransparency
fromleadership(42%)
Buildingtrust
andempathy(39%)
Bettercross-functional
alignment(38%)
We’vesaiditbeforeandwe’llsayit
again:peoplewanttoworktogetherwell.They
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024運(yùn)輸合同書格式正規(guī)范本
- 2025年度智慧社區(qū)物業(yè)管理系統(tǒng)承包合同范本4篇
- 2024食品行業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈管理供貨合同范本3篇
- 2025年度住宅小區(qū)車輛收費(fèi)員雇傭合同材料3篇
- 2024銀杏樹苗圃基地設(shè)施租賃與苗木采購合同3篇
- 2025年度智能化場消防系統(tǒng)升級改造維修工程合同4篇
- 2025年度新型智能車位買賣合同規(guī)范4篇
- 2025年度新能源汽車生產(chǎn)車間承包合作框架協(xié)議4篇
- 2025年度數(shù)據(jù)中心機(jī)房租賃及維護(hù)服務(wù)合同4篇
- 2025年度水庫環(huán)境保護(hù)與承包服務(wù)協(xié)議4篇
- 2025年度土地經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)合同補(bǔ)充條款范本
- 南通市2025屆高三第一次調(diào)研測試(一模)地理試卷(含答案 )
- 2025年上海市閔行區(qū)中考數(shù)學(xué)一模試卷
- 2025中國人民保險(xiǎn)集團(tuán)校園招聘高頻重點(diǎn)提升(共500題)附帶答案詳解
- 0的認(rèn)識和加、減法(說課稿)-2024-2025學(xué)年一年級上冊數(shù)學(xué)人教版(2024)001
- 重癥患者家屬溝通管理制度
- 醫(yī)院安全生產(chǎn)治本攻堅(jiān)三年行動實(shí)施方案
- 法規(guī)解讀丨2024新版《突發(fā)事件應(yīng)對法》及其應(yīng)用案例
- 工程項(xiàng)目合作備忘錄范本
- 信息安全意識培訓(xùn)課件
- Python試題庫(附參考答案)
評論
0/150
提交評論