版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
2024
publishedbyclio
Tableof
Contents
INTRODUCTION
6Mid-sizedfirmsversussmallerfirms
7Newthisyear
8Datasources
PART1
9THESTATEOFLEGALPRACTICE:HOWAREMID-SIZEDFIRMS
MEASURINGUP?
11Lawyershavematchedrateswithinflation,butnon-lawyersarewaybehind
13Mid-sizedfirmsaren’topeningmanymorecasesrelativeto2016
16Billingandcollectionperformanceisstrongamongmid-sizedfirms
18Keyperformanceindicators
PART2
26LOCKUP
28Whylockupmatters
29Measuringlockup
30Realizationlockup
32Collectionlockup
33Totallockup
34Featuresandworkflowsassociatedwithreducedlockup
36Howmid-sizedlawfirmscanreducelockup
PART3
37GETTINGPAIDFASTER
39Clientsandmid-sizedfirmsagree:billingtakestoolong
41Whygettingpaidfastermattersformid-sizedlawfirms
42Onlinepaymentsgetfirmspaidfaster
44Clientsalsowanttopayonline
2|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
45Useofonlinepaymentsbetweenmid-sizedlawfirmsandsmallerlawfirms
48Payingbycreditcard
49Howmid-sizedlawfirmscangetpaidfaster
PART4
51THERISEOFARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE(AI)
52Lawyersinmid-sizedandsmallerfirmshavesimilarattitudestowardsAIuse
53AIcopyrightandbarassociationissuesaretopofmindforlawyersin
midsizedfirms
57UsingAItoolsinpractice
58Whatwouldmid-sizedandsmallerfirmswanttouseAIforinthefuture?
60WhyAImattersformid-sizedfirms
61DoAIattitudesdifferbetweenlawyersinmid-sizedfirmsand
potentialclients?
62ThefutureofAIformid-sizedfirm
s
65Clio’sinvestmentinmid-sizedlawfirms
APPENDIXA
66APPDATACOLLECTION
67Appdatacollection
APPENDIXB
69SURVEYDESIGN
70Surveydesign
3|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Introduction
4|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Introduction
Toremaincompetitive,mid-sizedfirmswillneedtoovercomethechallengesassociatedwith
complexanddiverseorganizationalstructures.
Amonglawfirmsofallsizes,mid-sizedfirmshave
traditionallyenjoyedanadvantageouspositionattheintersectionofsizeanddiversityofwork.Asthese
firmsgrowandexpand,theyhaveenjoyedthebenefitofincreasedresources,allowingthemtotakeonmorework,expandtheiroverhead,andserviceclients
acrossavarietyofpracticeareas.
And,withrapidadvancementsinnewsystemsandtechnologiesover
thepastyear,thelegalprofessionhasseentremendousgrowth.Indeed,lawyersinmid-sizedfirmsarebillingmorehoursandcollectingmorerevenuethaneverbefore,whiletheavailabilityofmoretoolsand
opportunitiesforinnovationcreateendlesspossibilitiesformodernlawfirms.
Butaremid-sizedfirmstakingadvantageoftheseopportunities?While
mid-sizedfirmsareseeingsuccessintermsofbillablehoursandcollectedrevenue,theiroverallperformanceinbillingandcollectionssuggests
thatmanyfirmsarefailingtooptimizetheirworkflows.
5|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Introduction
Wealsoseegreaterpessimismamongmid-sizedfirmswhenweexploreattitudestowardsthearrivalofartificialintelligence(AI)—andwithit,theriskthatsomefirmsmayfailtoremaincompetitiveamongstanewgenerationofAI-enabledfirms.
Tokeeppace,mid-sizedfirmswillneedtoovercomethechallengesassociatedwithcomplexanddiverseorganizationalstructures.
Adaptingandevolvingtoimproveprocesses—whetherthatinvolvesnewbillingmethodsorembracingtherolethatAIcanplayin
automatinglegalworkflows—isequallycritical.
The2024LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirmsreportlooksatwhat
distinguishesmid-sizedlawfirmsfromsmallerpractices.Sincenoone-
size-fits-allmeasureofsuccessexists,thisreportprovidesinsightinto
keytrendsacrossmultipleperspectives—includingfinancialperformance,productivity,andclientexpectationsregardingonlinepayments.
Byanalyzingtheseinsights,weidentifywheremid-sizedlawfirmsoftenfacetheirgreatestchallengesandhowtheycanworktowardovercomingthem.
MID-SIZEDFIRMSVERSUSSMALLERFIRMS
Thisreportdefinesmid-sizedlawfirmsasthosewith20ormore
employees.Wecomparethiscohortto“smallerfirms,”orthosewith
fewerthan20employees.Thesearebroadgroupstocompare,butindoingso,we’vebeenabletoshedlightondistricttrendsdistinguishing
thesetwocohorts.Whilenofirmsizeisobjectivelybetterthantheother,thereisnodenyingthatasthestructureandmakeupoffirmsdiffer,
thecircumstancesforthosewhoworkinthemdifferaswell.
However,thefindingsinthisreportdon’tjustapplytomid-sizedfirms—theycanbeusefulforanyfirmthatoperatessimilarly,withhigher
overhead,entrenchedprocesses,andmoremanagerialsupervision.
6|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Introduction
Thefindingsinthisreportdon’tjustapplytomid-sizedfirms—theycanbeusefulforanyfirmthatoperatessimilarly,withhigheroverhead,
entrenchedprocesses,andmoremanagerialsupervision.
NEWTHISYEAR
We’veintroducedanumberofnewanalysesforthe2024LegalTrendsReportforMid-SizedLawFirms,summarizedasfollows:
EXPANDEDANALYSISOFTHESTATEOFLEGALPRACTICE
We’vebroadenedouranalysisofbusinessperformancetoincludedataasfarbackas2016.Thisexpandedhistoricalviewallowsustoidentifylonger-termtrendsthatprovideamorerobustpictureofhowfartheindustryhascome—andputsintoperspectivemorerecentchanges
relativetopastperformance.
ANEWMETRICFORFIRMPERFORMANCE:LOCKUP
We’veintroducedtheconceptof“l(fā)ockup”asameasureoflawfirmcash
flow.Thismetricincludesbothrealizationlockup,whichlooksathow
muchofafirm’srevenuesitsinanunbilledstate,andcollectionlockup,
whichmeasureshowmuchofafirm’srevenuehasbeenbilledbutremainsunpaid.Reducingtotallockupincreasescashflow,whichisinturnkey
toinvestinginbetterlawfirmprocesses.
7|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Introduction
PERCEPTIONSONAIINLEGALPRACTICE
Inoursurveysoflegalprofessionalsandthegeneralpopulation,we’veundertakenanextensivestudythatlooksatnewimportantperspectivesontheuseofAIforlegalpractice.WithAI’srapidearlypublicadoption,thisdatagivesinsightintowherethelegalindustryisatincomparison,andwherethegreatestopportunitieslieforfutureinnovation.
DATASOURCES
The2024LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirmsreportusesarangeof
methodologicalapproachesanddatasourcestodeliverthebestinsightsaboutthestateoflegalpracticeandstrategiesforfuturegrowth.
CLIODATA
We’veanalyzedaggregatedandanonymizeddatafromtensofthousands
oflegalprofessionalsintheUnitedStates,segmentedbasedonfirmsize,
toobservedifferencesinusagepatternsamongmid-sizedfirmsandsmallerfirms.Thisdataprovidesimportantinsightsabouthowtechnologyisbeingusedbylegalprofessionals,aswellasitsimpactonfirmperformance.
SURVEYOFLEGALPROFESSIONALS
Wesurveyed1,446legalprofessionals,segmentedbasedonfirmsize,
todistinguishandcompareresponsesbetweenmid-sizedfirmsand
smallerfirms,fromMay31toJuly20,2023.Thelegalprofessionalswe
surveyedincludedlawyersaswellassupportstaff—suchasparalegalsandadministrators—whoareengagedinthemanagementsideoftheirpractice.
SURVEYOFTHEGENERALPOPULATION
Wesurveyed1,012adultsintheU.S.generalpopulationfromJune13
toJune22,2023.Thissurveywasdesignedtogaugeattitudes,opinions,preferences,andbehaviorsregardingthelegalprofessionamong
individualswhohavehiredlawyersinthepastorwhomaybecome
potentiallegalclientsinthefuture.ThissampleisrepresentativeoftheU.S.populationbyage,gender,region,income,andrace/ethnicitybasedonthemostrecentU.S.censusstatistics.
8|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1
Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirms measuringup?
9|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
BylookingataggregatedandanonymizeddatafromtensofthousandsoflegalprofessionalsusingClio,we’vebenchmarkedmajortrendsinbusinessperformancethroughoutthelegalindustrysince2016.
Forlawyersinmid-sizedfirms,thisdataprovidesvaluableinsightintounderstandinghowtheirbusinessescomparetoothersintheindustry,whileidentifyingkeyfactorsforassessmentandimprovement.
10|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
LAWYERSHAVEMATCHEDRATESWITH
INFLATION,BUTNON-LAWYERSAREWAYBEHIND
Chancesare,youfelttheimpactofinflationin2023.Whetherpurchasinggroceries,officesupplies,orlegalservices,theincreasedcostofgoods
andservicesisevident.
Serviceproviders—includinglawfirms—arealsoundoubtedly
experiencingtheimpactofinflation,andmanyhaveadjustedtheir
hourlyratestocompensateforeconomicchanges.Aswesawinlastyear’s2023LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirmsreport,mid-sizedfirmsraised
theirhourlyratesatafasterpacethansmallerfirmsandtheCPI,likelyinresponsetothechallengesoftheCOVID-19pandemicandcostsresultingfromrisinginterestratesandinflation.
ByOctoberof2023,theCPInarrowlysurpassedtheaveragehourlyrateformid-sizedfirms.
11|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Whilelawyersinmid-sizedfirmsarebillingatahigheraveragehourlyratethaneverat$353perhour,theCPIcaughtuptotheaveragehourlyrateformid-sizedlawfirmsandnarrowlysurpasseditinOctober2023.
Howdosmallerfirms’hourlyratescomparetotheCPI?SinceOctober2021,smallerfirms’hourlyrateshavefailedtokeeppacewiththe
CPI.Theseresultsarenotnecessarilysurprising,asmanysolospride
themselvesonrunningleanerbusinessesandprovidingmoreaffordablelegalservices,whichcouldleavethemmorehesitanttoraisetheir
hourlyrates.
Withmid-sizedfirmsincreasingratestokeepupwithinflationand
smallerfirmsmaintainingmoreconsistentrates,growingcompetitionfromsmallerfirmsmayrequiremid-sizedfirmstothinkcriticallybeforeraisingtheirrates.Forexample,mid-sizedfirmsexperiencingincreasedcompetitionfromsmallerfirmsmaybebetterservedbynotraisingtheirrates,orbyraisingtheirratesataslowerpace.
12|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
MID-SIZEDFIRMSAREN’TOPENING
MANYMORECASESRELATIVETO2016
Whenthinkingaboutthesuccessofalawfirm,akeymeasureistheamountofworkthateachfirmmemberisabletotakeon.
Mid-sizedfirmmemberswhobilltheirtimehave,forthemostpart,takenonfewermattersatanygiventimewhencomparedto2016.Legalprofessionalsatsmallerfirmswhobilltheirtime,ontheotherhand,haveexperiencedcomparativegrowthinthenumberofcasesthey’vebeenabletotakeonovertime.
Mid-sizedlawfirmshave,forthemostpart,
takenonfewermattersatanygiventime
whencomparedto2016.
●
13|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Theseresultsmayindicatethatmid-sizedfirmsareactivelymanagingheadcountbasedontheamountofworkcoming(ornotcoming)
throughtheirdoors.Asaresult,weseeamoreconsistent,andsmaller,changeintheamountofmattersbeingworkedonbyeverytimekeeper.
Amongsmallerfirms,thegrowthinnewmattersmaybeexplainedbyincreasedcapacity—inotherwords,timekeepersinsmallerfirmsarefindingmoreefficienciesintheirwork,allowingtheirfirmstotake
onmorenewmatters.
Furthermore,mid-sizedfirmshaveconsistentlyheldahigherproportionofnon-attorneyactiveusersthansmallerfirms,suggestingthatmid-sizedfirmsmaybespreadinglaboracrossalargerbaseofemployees.
Whatdotheseresultsmeanformid-sizedlawfirms?Whiletheymaylookconcerningatfirstglance,takingonfewercasesovertimedoesnotnecessarilyindicatethatmid-sizedlawfirmsareunderperformingrelativetosmallerfirms.
14|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Whenwelookattheperformanceofresponsiblelawyers(orthenumberofnewmattersthatindividuallawyersareputinchargeof),lawyersinmid-sizedfirmshave,forthemostpart,seenmoregrowthbetween2018and2022.Theseresultsmayindicatethat,historically,a“l(fā)eadlawyer”inamid-sizedfirmmaybetakingonahighernumberoffiles,withabulkoftheworkbeingperformedbyotherindividualtimekeepers.
Morerecently,however,growthinthenumberofmattersalawyer
isresponsibleforhasalignedmorecloselybetweenmid-sizedfirmsandsmallerfirms.Theseresultsaresurprising,giventheassumptionthatlawyersinsmallerfirmswouldhavefewerresourcesthan
lawyersinmid-sizedfirmstotakeonmorenewmatters.Onepotentialexplanationmaybethatsmallerfirmsarefindingefficienciesin
theirpracticesthatallowthemtotakeonmorecases,suchastheadoptionofautomationtechnologies.
15|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Alternatively,ourpreviousresearchsuggeststhat,asafirm’ssize
increases,theyaremorelikelytoidentifytheirprimaryclientsas
businessesratherthanindividuals.Inotherwords,lawyersinmid-sizedfirmsmaybeopeningfewercasesbecausetheyareofferingongoing
legalguidancetoanumberofbusinessclients.Smallerfirms,ontheotherhand,maybemorelikelytoserviceindividualclientswith
one-offlegalissues,thusrequiringthemtoopenmorematters.
Consideringwhetheryourfirmistakingonenoughnewcasesiscriticalforfirms,butmaynotnecessarilybecauseforconcern,especiallyamongmid-sizedlawfirms.Attheendoftheday,thenumberofnewmatters
afirmtakesonmaymeanlittleiftheyarestillbillingandcollectingatahealthylevel.
BILLINGANDCOLLECTIONPERFORMANCE
ISSTRONGAMONGMID-SIZEDFIRMS
Comparedto2016,mid-sizedlawfirmshaveexperiencedtremendousgrowthinthenumberofbillablehourscapturedbytheiremployees,capturingover60%morebillablehoursthanin2016.
Unsurprisingly,smallerfirmshavealsoenjoyedgrowthintheirbillablehourssince2016—thoughtheyhaveconsistentlytrailedbehindmid-sizedfirms’performanceinthisarea,capturingonlyhalfofthegrowthenjoyedbymid-sizedlawfirms.
Theaveragelawyerinamid-sizedlawfirmisearningmorefortheirfirmthaneverbefore,
billing140%moreandcollectingnearly180%morethanin2016.
16|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Theaveragelawyerinamid-sizedlawfirmisalsoearningmorefortheirfirmthaneverbefore,billingnearly160%moreandcollecting200%morethanin2016.Evenwhencontrollingforincreasesinhourlyrates,the
averagelawyerinamid-sizedfirmstillbillsover100%moreandcollectsnearly140%morefortheirfirmthantheydidin2016.And,basedon
projections,thistremendousgrowthisontracktocontinueinto2024.
17|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
KEYPERFORMANCEINDICATORS
Clio’skeyperformanceindicators(KPIs)providebenchmarkinsightsintohowlawpracticesareperformingovertime,givingfirmsinsightintohowtomeasureandimprovetheirperformance.
EachKPIsignificantlyaffectsthenext,andwhenlookedattogether,theytellushowwellabusinessisperformingintermsofitsearningpotential.
Lawfirmsseekingto improvetheirrevenueshouldpayattentiontothreeKPIsinparticular:
?Utilizationrate,whichmeasuresthepercentageofaneight-hourworkdaythatgetsputtowardsbillablework.
?Realizationrate,whichmeasuresthepercentageofbillableworkthatgetsinvoicedtoclients.
?Collectionrate,whichmeasuresthepercentageofinvoicedworkthatgetspaid.
18|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
EachKPIsignificantlyaffectsthenext,andwhenlookedattogether,theytellushowwellabusinessisperformingintermsofitsearningpotential.Forexample,evenifalawfirmhasahighutilizationrate,ifitsuffersfromlowrealizationandcollectionrates,itlimitshowwellthatlawfirmcancapitalizeontheworkperformedbyitsstaff.
UTILIZATIONRATESATMID-SIZEDFIRMSSUGGESTIMPROVEMENTSINFIRMPERFORMANCE
Since2016,utilizationrateshaverisensteadilyforbothmid-sized
andsmallerlawfirms.However,amongmid-sizedfirms,theyear-to-yearincreasesinutilizationrateshaveconsistentlyoutpacedthoseinsmallerfirms,aligningwiththesignificantincreasesinbillablehours.This
indicatesthatlawyersinmid-sizedfirmsarefindingmoreeffectivewaystostreamlinetheirworkdaysandputmoretimetowardbillablework.
Lawyersinmid-sizedfirmsarefindingmoreeffectivewaystostreamlinetheirworkdaysandputmoretimetowardsbillablework.
19|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
SMALLERFIRMSCONSISTENTLYOUTPERFORMMID-SIZEDFIRMSONREALIZATIONRATES
Whilecomparativelystrongutilizationratessuggestthatmid-sizedfirmsarefindingwaystospendmoretimeonbillablework,theireffortsamounttolittleiftheyareunabletobillorcollectonthiswork.And,whenlookingatthegrowthinrealizationratesbetweenmid-sizedfirmsandsmaller
firms,mid-sizedfirmsappeartobehavinglesssuccesswhenitcomestoactuallyinvoicingbillablework.
Since2016,smallerfirmshaveconsistentlyoutperformedmid-sizedlawfirmsontheirrealizationrates.Inthe2023LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirmsreport,wefoundthatthegapbetweentherealizationratesofmid-
sizedandsmallerfirmshadnarrowedovertime,andmid-sizedfirmsweregettingclosertomatchingtherealizationratesenjoyedbysmallerfirms.However,alargergaphasemergedin2023,assmallerfirms’realization
rateshavecontinuedtogrowwhilemid-sizedfirms’realizationrateshaveremainedflat.
20|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Mid-sizedfirmsappeartobehavinglesssuccesswhenitcomestoactuallyinvoicingbillablework.
21|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
MID-SIZEDFIRMSAREFALLINGBEHINDSMALLERFIRMSONCOLLECTIONRATES
Whilecollectedamountstellusalotabouthowsuccessfullyafirmis
capturingpaymentsfortheirtime,it’salsoimportanttoconsideroverallcollectionrates—thatis,thepercentageofinvoicedworkthatactually
getspaidforbyclients.
Mid-sizedfirmsmaybecollectingmorethanever,butwhenitcomes
totheiroverallcollectionrate,smallerfirmsareactuallyoutperformingthem.However,ithasn’talwaysbeenthisway.Between2016and2019,
mid-sizedfirmswereoutperformingsmallerfirmsinthisarea.After2020,however,smallerfirmsbegantosurpassmid-sizedfirmsand,asof2023,areoutpacingmid-sizedfirmsinthisarea.
Whymightmid-sizedfirms’collectionratesbedropping?Onehypothesisisthat,asmid-sizedfirmstakeonmorecomplexworkandlarger
institutionalclients,thespeedandmanneratwhichtheymaybeabletocollectontheirworkdecreases.Forexample,corporateclientsmaybemorelikelytodrawoutpaymentsasapartoftheircorporatepaymentprocesses.Smallerfirms,whoaremorelikelytoworkwithindividualclients,mayhaveanadvantageinthisareaascloserclientrelationshipsandmorestraightforwardbillingprocessesenablethemtocollect
paymentsmoreefficiently.
Firmcomplexity—andthesilosassociatedwithit—mayalsobetoblame.Forexample,largerteamswithmoreprocessesandworkflowsmayalsohavetocontendwithdecreasedvisibilityandmorehurdlesblocking
theirabilitytofollowuponuncollectedpayments.
22|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
ANEEDTOCAPITALIZEONMID-SIZEDFIRMS’LEGALPRODUCTIVITY
Despitegenerallytakingonfewernewfilescomparedto2016,mid-sizedfirmsarecapturingmorebillablehoursandcollectingmoremoney
thanever.Coupledwithsteadilyincreasingutilizationrates,itappearsthatlawyersinmid-sizedfirmsareeffectivelycapitalizingonexistinglegalwork.
Adifferentstoryemergeswhenwelookathowefficientlymid-sizedlawfirmsarebillingandcollectingpaymentfortheirlegalservices.Whilemid-sizedfirmswereclosingthegapbetweentheirrealizationratesandtheleadingratesenjoyedbysmallerfirms,morerecentdatasuggeststhatthisperformancemaybestalling.Likewise,while
mid-sizedfirmsenjoyedaleadoncollectionratesagainstsmaller
firmsinthepast,since2020,smallerfirmshavesurpassedmid-sizedfirmsoncollectionrates.
23|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Ultimately,thenumberofhoursbilledortheamountcollectedneedstobeconsidered
againsttheoverallratesatwhichlawyers
billandcollectfortheirwork.
●
Iffirmsarebillingandcollectingmorethanever,whyshouldtheycareaboutlowerrealizationandcollectionrates?Ultimately,thenumberofhoursbilledortheamountcollectedneedstobeconsideredagainsttheoverallratesatwhichlawyersbillandcollectfortheirwork.Namely,iffirmssufferfromlowrealizationandcollectionrates,thosefirms
arenotfullycapitalizingontheworkperformedbytheirstaff.
Take,forexample,thevalueofthecomparativeutilizationratesamongmid-sizedfirmsandsmallerfirms.
Assuminganaveragehourlyrateof$300,whenwecomparetheutilizationratesamonglawyersinmid-sizedfirms(47%)andsmallerfirms(33%),
alawyerinamid-sizedfirmwillperform$336morebillableworkthanalawyerinasmallerfirmonagivenday.However,whenwefactorinthelowerrealizationandcollectionratesamonglawyersinmid-sizedfirms,thedifferenceincollectedamountforthatsameworkdropstoapproximately$173perday.
Overall,theaveragelawyerinamid-sizedfirmislosingoutonover$340inrevenueeachdaybasedonpoorbillingandcollectionpracticesalone.
24|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part1:Thestateoflegalpractice:Howaremid-sizedfirmsmeasuringup?
Thisexampleunderscorestheneedformid-sizedlawfirmstotake
chargeoftheirbillingandcollectionpractices.Totrulyreapthebenefitsofimprovedutilizationrates,mid-sizedfirmsneedtolookathowwelltheyarebilling,andcollectingonbilledamounts.Totakeitonestep
further,lawyersneedtoalsopayattentiontohowquicklyandconsistentlytheyaregettingpaid.Inthenextsection,weintroduceanewKPIcalled“l(fā)ockup”tohelpfirmsassesstheircashflow.
25|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part2
Lockup
26|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part2:Lockup
Inthe
2023LegalTrendsReport
,weintroducedtheconceptof“l(fā)ockup.”Thisaccountingtermhelps
lawfirmsassesscashflowintheirbusinessesby
showinghowmuchrevenue—measuredindaysofwork—isunbilledanduncollectedatanygiventime.
Knowinghowmanydays’worthofworkareheldinlockupgivesusanunderstandingofwhatcashflowlookslikeinalawfirm.Firmswith
ahighamountofrevenuestuckinlockup—relativetoexpectedannualearnings—haveslowercashflow.Ontheotherhand,firmsthatcanbilloutandcollectontheirworkmoreefficientlywillhavelessoftheir
revenueinlockup,whichwillseethemachievegreatercashflow.
Knowinghowmanydays’worthofworkareheldinlockupgivesusanunderstandingofwhatcashflowlookslikeinalawfirm.
27|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
?Realizationlockupistheamountofrevenue
thatisunbilledatanygiventime(alsoknownas“work-in-progresslockup”).
?Collectionlockupistheamountofrevenuethatisuncollectedatanygiventime(alsoknownas“debtorlockup”).
?Totallockupisacombinationofrevenueheldinbothrealizationandcollectionlockup.
Lockupconsistsofthree
measureswithinthe
billingprocess:
WHYLOCKUPMATTERS
Havingcashonhandmeansthatabusinesshastheworkingcapitaltocoverallofitsshort-andlong-termcostsandcanpaythemoutontime.And,whilecashflowisimportantforallbusinesses,stayingontopofcashflowisespeciallycriticalformid-sizedlawfirms.
Higheroverheadcosts—includinglargerstaffnumbers,officespace,
andtechnologyinfrastructure—makethechallengeofgettingpaid
promptlyofcriticalimportanceformid-sizedlawfirms.Whileincreasedbusinessinfrastructuremayprovidetheopportunitytogeneratemorerevenue,italsobringsincreasedliabilities.Failingtoensureconsistentcashflowinthesecircumstancescanbe,quitesimply,catastrophicformid-sizedlawfirms.
28|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part2:Lockup
Whileincreasedbusinessinfrastructuremayprovidetheopportunityto
generatemorerevenue,italsobringsincreasedliabilities.
MEASURINGLOCKUP
Calculatingrealizationandcollectionlockupallowslawfirmsto
determinehowmanydays’worthofunbilledoruncollectedworktheyarecarrying.Buthowisitdone?
Tocalculaterealizationlockup,divideyourfirm’sworkinprogress
(or,theamountofunbilledworkcarriedbyyourfirm)byyourpreviousyear’sfiscalcollections.Then,multiplytheresultingnumberby365
toobtainyourfirm’srealizationlockup—orthedaysofrevenuelockedinunbilledworkcarriedbyyourlawfirm.
Realizationlockup=(workinprogressdividedbypreviousfiscalyear’scollections)x365days
29|LegalTrendsforMid-SizedLawFirms
Part2:Lockup
Tocalculatecollectionlockup,divideyourfirm’saccountsreceivablebyyourpreviousyear’sfisca
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 嬰兒管理系統(tǒng)課程設(shè)計
- 學(xué)系統(tǒng)課課程設(shè)計
- 智能風(fēng)扇試講課程設(shè)計
- 文本信息處理的課程設(shè)計
- 有趣的靈魂互動課程設(shè)計
- 夾具課程設(shè)計
- Nivegacetor-生命科學(xué)試劑-MCE
- Nedemelteon-生命科學(xué)試劑-MCE
- 幼兒綠葉蔬菜課程設(shè)計
- LY-99335-生命科學(xué)試劑-MCE
- 2024-2025學(xué)年高二上學(xué)期期末數(shù)學(xué)試卷(基礎(chǔ)篇)(含答案)
- 2023-2024學(xué)年廣東省廣州市白云區(qū)九年級(上)期末語文試卷
- 汽車吊籃使用專項施工方案
- 2024年典型事故案例警示教育手冊15例
- 中秋國慶慰問品采購?fù)稑?biāo)方案
- 110kV變電站及110kV輸電線路運維投標(biāo)技術(shù)方案(第二部分)
- 大數(shù)據(jù)與政務(wù)信息共享應(yīng)用(PPT-58頁)課件
- GB∕T 2099.1-2021 家用和類似用途插頭插座 第1部分:通用要求
- 名中醫(yī)工作室跟師醫(yī)案記錄 (27)
- 中國古代文學(xué)史_袁行霈_隋唐五代文學(xué)
- 日標(biāo)法蘭尺寸表
評論
0/150
提交評論