美國特拉華大學本科教學質量評價與策略探析_2

1、    美國特拉華大學本科教學質量評價與策略探析    11nsse 2011 u. s. evaluation of student experiences at the university of delaware results of the 2011 national survey of student engagement（nsse）eb/ol. university of delaware > > office of institutional research and effectiveness > > ud nss

2、e.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/12national survey of student engagement. nsse 2008 benchmark descriptive statistics first-year studentseb/ol.center for postsecondary research and school of education at indiana university > > pdf.（sine die）2014-05-14.http：/ gbenchmarksfy.pdf.13national survey of

3、student engagement. nsse 2008 benchmark descriptive statistics senior studentseb/ol.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/14nsse 2011 u. s. benchmark descriptive statistics by carnegie classification first-year students.eb/ol. center for postsecondary research and school of education at indiana university >

4、; > pdf.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/15nsse 2011 u. s. benchmark descriptive statistics by carnegie classification. seniorseb/ol. center for postsecondary research and school of education at indiana university > > pdf.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/16first year seminar office. first year experi

5、enceeb/ol. university of delaware > > university of delaware first year experience.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/17office of undergraduate research and experiential learning. service learningeb/ol. university of delaware > > ud engage > > service learning.（sine die）2014-05-14.http：/1

6、8institute for global studies. our historyeb/ol. university of delaware > > institute for global studies > >studyabroad.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/19alfred lerner college of business & economics. study abroadeb/ol. university of delaware > > alfred lerner college of business &

7、amp; economics > > students > >study abroad.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/20sapling learning. about sapling learningeb/ol. sapling learning > > about-sapling-learning.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/21college of arts and sciences. welcome from the directoreb/ol. university of delaware &g

8、t; > ud college of arts and sciences > > welcome from the director.（sine die）2014-05-14. http：/22merwin，j. c. historical review of changing concepts of evaluationm/tyler，r. l. educational evaluation：new roles，new methods：the sixty-eighth yearbook of the national society for the study of edu

9、cation，part ii. chicago：university of chicago press，1969：5-25.23pace，c. r. the undergraduates：a report of their activities and college experiences in the 1980sm. los angeles：center for the study of evaluation，ucla graduate school of education，1990：10-18.24astin，a. w. student involvement：a developmen

10、tal theory for higher educationj. journal of college student development，1984，25（4）：297-308.25tinto，v. leaving college：rethinking the causes and cures of student attritionm. chicago：university of chicago press，1987：108-128.26tinto，v. leaving college：rethinking the causes and cures of student attriti

11、onm. 2nd ed. chicago：university of chicago press，1993：113-115.27chickering，a. w. & gamson，z. f. seven principles for good practice in undergraduate educationj. aahe bulletin，1987（3）：3-7.28pascarella，e. t. college environmental influences on learning and cognitive development：a critical review an

12、d synthesism/smart，j. c. higher education：handbook of theory and research. new york：agathon，1985：55-78.29endo，j. j. & harpel，r. l. the effect of student-faculty interaction on students' educational outcomesj. research in higher education，1982（16）：115-137.30gellin，a. the effect of undergradua

13、te student involvement on critical thinking：a meta-analysis of the literature，1991-2000j. journal of college student development，2003（44）：746-762.31kuh，g. d.“they shall be known by what they do”：an activities-based typology of college studentsj. journal of college student development，2000（41）：228-24

14、4.32kuh，g. d. & vesper，n. a comparison of student experiences with good practices in undergraduate education between 1990 and 1994j. review of higher education，1997（21）：43-61.33pascarella，e. t.，et al. student faculty relationships and freshman year intellectual growth in a nonresidential setting

15、j. journal of college student development，1983（24）：395-402.34pascarella，e. t.，et al. what have we learned from the first year of the national study of student learning？j.journal of college student development，1996（37）182-192.35pike，g. r. the effects of residential learning communities and traditiona

16、l residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of collegej.journal of college student development，1999（40）：269-284.36pike，g. r. the influence of fraternity or sorority membership on students' college experiences and cognitive developmentj. research in higher educati

17、on，2000（41）：117-139.37pike，g. r. & killian，t. s. reported gains in student learning：do academic disciplines make a difference？j. research in higher education，2001（42）：429-454.38pike，g. r.，et al. the relationship between institutional mission and students' involvement and educational outcomes

18、j. research in higher education，2003（44）：243-263.39terenzini，p. t.，et al. students' out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development：a literature reviewj. journal of college student development，1996（37）：149-162.40pike，g. r.，et al. enhancing the educational impac

19、t of residence halls：the relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistencej. journal of college student development，1997（38）：609-621.41astin，a. w. student involvement：a developmental theory for higher educationj. journal of college student development，1984（25）：297-308.42berger，j. b.