美國商學院必教的15個案例_第1頁
美國商學院必教的15個案例_第2頁
美國商學院必教的15個案例_第3頁
美國商學院必教的15個案例_第4頁
美國商學院必教的15個案例_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩14頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、美國商學院必教的15個經(jīng)典案例愛思英語編者按:如果你是商學院的學生,那么你會接觸到大量的案例,這些案例大都是一些比較大型的公司真實發(fā)生過的事情。如果你要從中學到真本事,那么有15個經(jīng)典的案例你必須要了解。15LessonsEveryoneLearnsAtBusinessSchoolIfyouattendbusinessschool,youcanexpecttoreadalotofcasestudies.Professorslovethembecausetheyofferreal-worldexamplesofwhybusinessessucceedandfail.Therearesomecla

2、ssiccasesthateverybusinessstudentshouldknow,likewhyApplechangeditsnameandhowRyanairbeattwoindustrygiants.We'vecompiledthemostinfluentialcaseshere,withrecommendationsfrombusinessschoolprofessorsacrossthenationandabroad.WhyApplechangeditsnameCase:AppleInc.,2008Keytakeaway:Sometimesyoucan'ttake

3、arivalheadon.Whathappened?ApplechangeditsnamefromAppleComputerstoAppleInc.in2007.Thatreflectedafundamentalshiftinitsbusiness,awayfromitsiconicMaccomputersandtowardsnewlinesliketheiPodandnewiPhone,whichmadeupmorethanhalfofthecompany'srevenuebythen.Thoughstillanimportantpartofthecompany,Apple'

4、samazingsuccesscamefromcompletelychangingtheworldofdigitaldevicesratherthanfrombeatingWintelforshareofthecomputermarket.Itreinventeditself,anddidsoverysuccessfully.HowLululemonkeptitscultCase:Leadership,Culture,andTransitionatlululemonKeytakeaway:Figureouthowtobringthefoundersintoastrategyratherthan

5、alienatingthem.Whathappened?Inmid-2008newCEOChristineDaytookoverfromfounderDennisChipWilson.Thedecisioncameasthecompanywantedtoexpandandbecomemorecorporate.Atthesametime,Wilsonwasconcernedaboutmaintainingthecultureandvaluesofthecompany.Dayfacedentrenchedproblemslikeoutperformingstores,apoorrealestat

6、estrategy,andbarriersbetweenvariouspartsofthecompany.SheusedherexperiencefromhelpingexpandStarbucksworldwidetoalignthewholecompanywithastrategicplan.SheevenconvincedthefounderstoattendadvancedmanagementprogramsatHarvardandStanfordsotheycouldbetterunderstandhowthecompanymustchange.Wortharound$350mill

7、ionatthestartofhertenure,Lululemonisnowa$10.59billiondollarcompany.HowCiscobouncedbackCase:CiscoSystems:DevelopingAHumanCapitalStrategyKeytakeaway:Greathomegrowntalentandaculturethatvaluesitareahugeadvantagesinatoughenvironment.Whathappened?:Ciscogrewrapidlyduringthetechbubble,acquiring70companiesan

8、dmorethandoublingitsworkforce.Afterthebubbleburst,thecompanyhadtochangethewayitgrewanddevelopedtalent,tobuildmorefromwithinratherthangoingoutandbuyingit.ThecompanycreatedateamtodevelopandleverageCisco'stalentandbeganthe'CiscoUniversity'initiativetopromoteanagileandversatileworkforce.With

9、inthreeyears,thecompanyhadturnedaroundandwaslistedasoneofthetopcompaniestobecomealeader.HowUSATodayreinventeditselfCase:USAToday:PursuingTheNetworkStrategyKeytakeaway:Sometimestheoldguardcan'thandleanewreality.Whathappened?Facingfallingcirculationofthedailynewspaperandtheriseofdigitalnews,USATod

10、ayCEOTomCurleysawtheneedtobetterintegratehisbusinesses,toleverageandsharecontentacrossthecompany'sinternet,televisionandprintplatforms.Hismanagementteamandstaffwereresistant,claiminginsurmountabledividesincultureandworkstyle.Curleyhadtomakethecasethatthiswasessentialforthefutureofthebusiness,and

11、eventuallyreplaced5of7seniormanagersaspartofthechange.HowDreyer'ssurvivedadisasterCase:Dreyer'sGrandIceCreamKeytakeaway:Don'ttrytospinbadnewsormisleadworkers.Whathappened?Avarietyofproblemsatthecompany,includinghighinputprices,acollapseinsalesofalowfatproductline,andtheendofadistribution

12、contractwithBenJerry'sforcedrestructuringonthecompany.Duringtherestructuring,thecompany'sexecutivesflewalloverthecountryandmetwitheveryemployeetodiscusstheplan,preservingthecompany'scultureofopennessandaccountability.Thecompanycontinuedinvestmentinaleadershipprogram.Thisculturalconsisten

13、cyandemployeefaithinleadershiphelpedthembouncebackwithinacoupleofyears.HowMicrosoftchallengedGoogleonitshometurfCase:Microsoft'sSearchKeytakeaway:There'snomagicsolution.Ittakesanentireorganization'sexperienceandtalent.Whathappened?10yearsafteritsfounding,Googlehadmanagedtobecomedominanti

14、nsearchandsearchadvertising.Microsoftwasadistantthird,andadealtobuyYahoohadfallenthrough.Thoughalreadyinaverystrongfinancialposition,itwantedabiggerpieceofarapidly-growingbusiness.ThecasetracksGoogle'srise,Microsoft'sinitialsearchefforts,andMicrosoft'spushforrealinnovationin2008,whichled

15、toBing!in2009.Microsoftdecidedtofocusonhowitmetsuchchallengesinthepast,focusingonuserexperience,thebusinessmodel,andtheecosystemoftheindustryinquestion,alongwithasignificantmarketingeffort.HowRyanairbeattwogiantsoftheindustryCase:DogfightOverEurope:RyanairKeytakeaway:Leanorganizationsfocusedonasingl

16、ebusinesscanleadoncostandchallengeestablishedcompetitors.Whathappened?:In1986,thetwoRyanbrothersannouncedthattheiryoungairlinewilltakeongiantslikeBritishAirwaysandAerLingusforthefirsttimeontheroutebetweenDublinandLondon.Itsignificantlyundercutthosetwoairlinesonprice,bringinginpeoplewhohadpreviouslyp

17、referredrailorferrytickets.HowethicaldecisionsaredifferentabroadCase:MerckSharpDohmeArgentina,Inc.Keytakeaway:Ethicaldecisionsaren'talwayscutanddry.Whathappened?ThenewmanagingdirectoroftheArgentiniansubsidiaryofMerckwastaskedwithchangingitintoamoremodernandprofessionalbusinessorganization.Ashort

18、timeintohistermhewasconfrontedwithanethicaldilemma.Acandidateforahighlycompetitiveinternship,whomissedthecut,wasthesonofahighrankingofficialinthegovernment'shealthcaresystem.ItwasimpliedthathiringthestudentwouldensurethatMerck'sdrugswouldbeincludedonthegovernment'shealthcareroster,increa

19、singsales.ItwasaconflictbetweenMosquera'sdesiretoreform,andtherealitiesofdoingbusinessinachangingcountry.WhyCirqueduSoleilmovedoutsideitscomfortzoneCase:CirqueduSoleil-TheHigh-WireActOfBuildingSustainablePartnershipsKeytakeaway:Sometimesyouhavetomovepastanoldpartnershipinordertogrow.Whathappened

20、?CirqueduSoleilhadamutually-beneficialandveryprofitablepartnershipwiththeMGMMiragecasinos.Thecasinomadecapitalinvestmentsintheatersforthecompany'suniqueshows,andtheshowsbroughtinhigh-spendingclients.FacedwithopportunitiesinAsiaandtheMiddleEast,CEODanielLamarrehadtofigureouthowtocreatedifferentpa

21、rtnerships.WhyAirborneExpresslostthedeliveryraceCase:AirborneExpressKeytakeaway:Specializationcancompetewitheconomiesofscale,butonlyuptoacertainpoint.Whathappened?AsmallercompetitortogiantslikeFedExandUPS,AirborneExpresshadmanagedtosignificantlygrowrevenuesdespiteitssize.Partofthathadcomeontheheelso

22、fastrikeatUPS,andthecompanyhadtotakeadvantageofthat.SinceFedExandUPSweresolarge,thecompanyhadtofindawaytospecializetosurvive.Theytargetedhighvolumebusinesscustomers,shippedprimarilytolargemetropolitanareas,aggressivelycutcosts,andadoptednewtechnologyafterFedExandUPS.Ultimately,thatstrategywasn't

23、sustainable,andthecompanywasacquiredbyDHL.HowbadcommunicationnearlyruinedamanagerCase:ErikPetersonKeytakeaway:Playingpoliticscanbeunavoidable.Whathappened?ThecasefollowsarecentMBAgraduatewhohadbecomethegeneralmanageratasubsidiaryofalargecellphonecompanyinthelate80s.Peterson'sgroupwasintheprocess

24、ofbuildinguptooffercellphoneserviceinpartsofNewHampshireandVermont.Theprojectwasbehindschedule,andPetersonhadofferedaplantomeetarevisedtarget,tobereviewedbyheadquarters.Thoughhardworkingandcompetent,Petersonhadtroublewithhisimmediatesuperior.Hedidnotknowwhoexactlyhehadtoreportto,whichcreatedproblems

25、onbothendswhilehewasattemptingtocompleteasignificantreorganizationandhadproblemswithhischiefengineer.Becauseofthelackofsupport,Petersonhadtogoitaloneinmanyways.Eventually,thecompanywasrestructuredandPeterson'srolebecamemoreclear.HowWilliamAveryfilledtheshoesofalegendCase:CrownCorkSealin1989Keyta

26、keaway:Don'tbeafraidtothinkforyourself.Whathappened?WilliamAverysucceededthemanwhohadsavedthecompany,theagingJohnConnellyasCEOin1989.AveryhadtoreevaluateConnelly'slongstandingstrategy,ascostefficiencycouldn'tworkalone.Newcompetitorshademerged,marginsweredecreasing,amajorrivalwasforsale,a

27、ndtheircoremetalcanbusinessdidn'tlooklikeitwouldgrowsignificantlyincomingyears.Hehadtodecidewhethertoattempttogrowthroughacquisition,whichhadn'talwaysworkedintheindustry,orexpandtonewanddifferentproductslikeplastics.Thecompanyendedupdoingboth,andmanufacturesoneinfivebeveragecansusedworldwide

28、.WhyCiscostartedhuntingbiggergameCase:NewMillennium,NewAcquisitionStrategy?CiscoSystemsKeytakeaway:Companiesneeddifferentthingsatdifferenttimes.Whathappened?Around2006,severalyearsaftertheperioddescribedinDevelopingAHumanCapitalStrategyCiscobegantomoveawayfromitslongstandingacquisitionstrategyofbuyi

29、ngsmallinnovativestartupsandtowardslargerplatformdeals.Theinitialstrategycameaboutastheinternetwasgrowingrapidly,andcustomerslookedtoCiscoforawidevarietyofsolutions.ThecaseoutlineshowCisco'sacquisitionstrategydeveloped,thenchangedasthecompanyandmarketdid.HowLincolnElectricsucceededwithawildlyunc

30、onventionalstrategyCase:LincolnElectricCo.Keytakeaway:Keepitsimple.Whathappened?:OneofHarvard'sclassiccases,withover200,000copiessold,examinestheuniquecultureandstrategyofwhatwasthelargestmanufacturerofarc-weldingproductsin1975.Thecompanyprovidednobenefitsanddidn'thaveaunion.Italsoprovidedgu

31、aranteedemployment,employeeequity,andgavemanagementresponsibilitytoworkers.Particularlyuniquewasthewayitpaiditsworkers,inapieceworkfashionwithbonusesbasedonthecompany'srevenues.Workersgenerallyearnedsignificantlymorethanthoseatsimilarcompanies,butthecompanywasstillproductiveatlowcost.Lincoln'

32、;sstrategywasunusual,butveryclear,veryconsistent,andverysuccessfulinmotivatingitsworkers.WhyNucorSteeltookacompanysizedgambleCase:NucorataCrossroadsKeytakeaway:Operationsexpertisehaslimits,newinvestmentdeterminesitsscale.Whathappened?In1986,Nucor'sCEOKennethIversonhadtomakeacriticaldecisiononwhe

33、therornottoadoptanewsteelcastingtechnology.Thetechnologywouldallowthecompanytogainsignificantfirstmoveradvantageandreducecostsinthelongrun.Thecompanywouldhavetomakeahugeinvestment,however,andtechnologywasunprovenanditcouldbeleapfroggedincomingyears.Nucorendedupbuildingthefirstplantwiththenewtechnolo

34、gyin1989,andremainsoneofthelargeststeelmakersintheUnitedStates.愛思英語編者按:如果你是商學院的學生,那么你會接觸到大量的案例,這些案例大都是一些比較大型的公司真實發(fā)生過的事情。如果你要從中學到真本事,那么有15個經(jīng)典的案例你必須要了解。15LessonsEveryoneLearnsAtBusinessSchoolIfyouattendbusinessschool,youcanexpecttoreadalotofcasestudies.Professorslovethembecausetheyofferreal-worldexamp

35、lesofwhybusinessessucceedandfail.Therearesomeclassiccasesthateverybusinessstudentshouldknow,likewhyApplechangeditsnameandhowRyanairbeattwoindustrygiants.We'vecompiledthemostinfluentialcaseshere,withrecommendationsfrombusinessschoolprofessorsacrossthenationandabroad.WhyApplechangeditsnameCase:App

36、leInc.,2008Keytakeaway:Sometimesyoucan'ttakearivalheadon.Whathappened?ApplechangeditsnamefromAppleComputerstoAppleInc.in2007.Thatreflectedafundamentalshiftinitsbusiness,awayfromitsiconicMaccomputersandtowardsnewlinesliketheiPodandnewiPhone,whichmadeupmorethanhalfofthecompany'srevenuebythen.T

37、houghstillanimportantpartofthecompany,Apple'samazingsuccesscamefromcompletelychangingtheworldofdigitaldevicesratherthanfrombeatingWintelforshareofthecomputermarket.Itreinventeditself,anddidsoverysuccessfully.HowLululemonkeptitscultCase:Leadership,Culture,andTransitionatlululemonKeytakeaway:Figur

38、eouthowtobringthefoundersintoastrategyratherthanalienatingthem.Whathappened?Inmid-2008newCEOChristineDaytookoverfromfounderDennisChipWilson.Thedecisioncameasthecompanywantedtoexpandandbecomemorecorporate.Atthesametime,Wilsonwasconcernedaboutmaintainingthecultureandvaluesofthecompany.Dayfacedentrench

39、edproblemslikeoutperformingstores,apoorrealestatestrategy,andbarriersbetweenvariouspartsofthecompany.SheusedherexperiencefromhelpingexpandStarbucksworldwidetoalignthewholecompanywithastrategicplan.SheevenconvincedthefounderstoattendadvancedmanagementprogramsatHarvardandStanfordsotheycouldbetterunder

40、standhowthecompanymustchange.Wortharound$350millionatthestartofhertenure,Lululemonisnowa$10.59billiondollarcompany.HowCiscobouncedbackCase:CiscoSystems:DevelopingAHumanCapitalStrategyKeytakeaway:Greathomegrowntalentandaculturethatvaluesitareahugeadvantagesinatoughenvironment.Whathappened?:Ciscogrewr

41、apidlyduringthetechbubble,acquiring70companiesandmorethandoublingitsworkforce.Afterthebubbleburst,thecompanyhadtochangethewayitgrewanddevelopedtalent,tobuildmorefromwithinratherthangoingoutandbuyingit.ThecompanycreatedateamtodevelopandleverageCisco'stalentandbeganthe'CiscoUniversity'init

42、iativetopromoteanagileandversatileworkforce.Withinthreeyears,thecompanyhadturnedaroundandwaslistedasoneofthetopcompaniestobecomealeader.HowUSATodayreinventeditselfCase:USAToday:PursuingTheNetworkStrategyKeytakeaway:Sometimestheoldguardcan'thandleanewreality.Whathappened?Facingfallingcirculationo

43、fthedailynewspaperandtheriseofdigitalnews,USATodayCEOTomCurleysawtheneedtobetterintegratehisbusinesses,toleverageandsharecontentacrossthecompany'sinternet,televisionandprintplatforms.Hismanagementteamandstaffwereresistant,claiminginsurmountabledividesincultureandworkstyle.Curleyhadtomakethecaset

44、hatthiswasessentialforthefutureofthebusiness,andeventuallyreplaced5of7seniormanagersaspartofthechange.HowDreyer'ssurvivedadisasterCase:Dreyer'sGrandIceCreamKeytakeaway:Don'ttrytospinbadnewsormisleadworkers.Whathappened?Avarietyofproblemsatthecompany,includinghighinputprices,acollapseinsa

45、lesofalowfatproductline,andtheendofadistributioncontractwithBenJerry'sforcedrestructuringonthecompany.Duringtherestructuring,thecompany'sexecutivesflewalloverthecountryandmetwitheveryemployeetodiscusstheplan,preservingthecompany'scultureofopennessandaccountability.Thecompanycontinuedinve

46、stmentinaleadershipprogram.Thisculturalconsistencyandemployeefaithinleadershiphelpedthembouncebackwithinacoupleofyears.HowMicrosoftchallengedGoogleonitshometurfCase:Microsoft'sSearchKeytakeaway:There'snomagicsolution.Ittakesanentireorganization'sexperienceandtalent.Whathappened?10yearsaf

47、teritsfounding,Googlehadmanagedtobecomedominantinsearchandsearchadvertising.Microsoftwasadistantthird,andadealtobuyYahoohadfallenthrough.Thoughalreadyinaverystrongfinancialposition,itwantedabiggerpieceofarapidly-growingbusiness.ThecasetracksGoogle'srise,Microsoft'sinitialsearchefforts,andMic

48、rosoft'spushforrealinnovationin2008,whichledtoBing!in2009.Microsoftdecidedtofocusonhowitmetsuchchallengesinthepast,focusingonuserexperience,thebusinessmodel,andtheecosystemoftheindustryinquestion,alongwithasignificantmarketingeffort.HowRyanairbeattwogiantsoftheindustryCase:DogfightOverEurope:Rya

49、nairKeytakeaway:Leanorganizationsfocusedonasinglebusinesscanleadoncostandchallengeestablishedcompetitors.Whathappened?:In1986,thetwoRyanbrothersannouncedthattheiryoungairlinewilltakeongiantslikeBritishAirwaysandAerLingusforthefirsttimeontheroutebetweenDublinandLondon.Itsignificantlyundercutthosetwoa

50、irlinesonprice,bringinginpeoplewhohadpreviouslypreferredrailorferrytickets.HowethicaldecisionsaredifferentabroadCase:MerckSharpDohmeArgentina,Inc.Keytakeaway:Ethicaldecisionsaren'talwayscutanddry.Whathappened?ThenewmanagingdirectoroftheArgentiniansubsidiaryofMerckwastaskedwithchangingitintoamore

51、modernandprofessionalbusinessorganization.Ashorttimeintohistermhewasconfrontedwithanethicaldilemma.Acandidateforahighlycompetitiveinternship,whomissedthecut,wasthesonofahighrankingofficialinthegovernment'shealthcaresystem.ItwasimpliedthathiringthestudentwouldensurethatMerck'sdrugswouldbeincl

52、udedonthegovernment'shealthcareroster,increasingsales.ItwasaconflictbetweenMosquera'sdesiretoreform,andtherealitiesofdoingbusinessinachangingcountry.WhyCirqueduSoleilmovedoutsideitscomfortzoneCase:CirqueduSoleil-TheHigh-WireActOfBuildingSustainablePartnershipsKeytakeaway:Sometimesyouhavetomo

53、vepastanoldpartnershipinordertogrow.Whathappened?CirqueduSoleilhadamutually-beneficialandveryprofitablepartnershipwiththeMGMMiragecasinos.Thecasinomadecapitalinvestmentsintheatersforthecompany'suniqueshows,andtheshowsbroughtinhigh-spendingclients.FacedwithopportunitiesinAsiaandtheMiddleEast,CEOD

54、anielLamarrehadtofigureouthowtocreatedifferentpartnerships.WhyAirborneExpresslostthedeliveryraceCase:AirborneExpressKeytakeaway:Specializationcancompetewitheconomiesofscale,butonlyuptoacertainpoint.Whathappened?AsmallercompetitortogiantslikeFedExandUPS,AirborneExpresshadmanagedtosignificantlygrowrev

55、enuesdespiteitssize.PartofthathadcomeontheheelsofastrikeatUPS,andthecompanyhadtotakeadvantageofthat.SinceFedExandUPSweresolarge,thecompanyhadtofindawaytospecializetosurvive.Theytargetedhighvolumebusinesscustomers,shippedprimarilytolargemetropolitanareas,aggressivelycutcosts,andadoptednewtechnologyaf

56、terFedExandUPS.Ultimately,thatstrategywasn'tsustainable,andthecompanywasacquiredbyDHL.HowbadcommunicationnearlyruinedamanagerCase:ErikPetersonKeytakeaway:Playingpoliticscanbeunavoidable.Whathappened?ThecasefollowsarecentMBAgraduatewhohadbecomethegeneralmanageratasubsidiaryofalargecellphonecompan

57、yinthelate80s.Peterson'sgroupwasintheprocessofbuildinguptooffercellphoneserviceinpartsofNewHampshireandVermont.Theprojectwasbehindschedule,andPetersonhadofferedaplantomeetarevisedtarget,tobereviewedbyheadquarters.Thoughhardworkingandcompetent,Petersonhadtroublewithhisimmediatesuperior.Hedidnotkn

58、owwhoexactlyhehadtoreportto,whichcreatedproblemsonbothendswhilehewasattemptingtocompleteasignificantreorganizationandhadproblemswithhischiefengineer.Becauseofthelackofsupport,Petersonhadtogoitaloneinmanyways.Eventually,thecompanywasrestructuredandPeterson'srolebecamemoreclear.HowWilliamAveryfill

59、edtheshoesofalegendCase:CrownCorkSealin1989Keytakeaway:Don'tbeafraidtothinkforyourself.Whathappened?WilliamAverysucceededthemanwhohadsavedthecompany,theagingJohnConnellyasCEOin1989.AveryhadtoreevaluateConnelly'slongstandingstrategy,ascostefficiencycouldn'tworkalone.Newcompetitorshademerged,marginsweredecreasing,amajorrivalwasforsale,andtheircoremetalcanbusinessdidn'tlooklikeitwouldgrowsignificantlyincomingyears.Hehadtodecidewhethertoattempttogrowthroughacquisition,whichhadn'talwaysworkedintheind

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論