2003年12月英語二級筆譯綜合能力試題及答案

1、2003年12月英語二級筆譯綜合能力試題Part 1 Summary Writing1. Read the following English passage and then write a Chinese summary of approximately 300 words that expresses its main ideas and basic information (40 points, 50 minutes). Deceptively small in column inches, a recent New York Times article holds large mea

2、ning for us in business. The item concerned one Daniel Provenzano, 38, of Upper Saddle River, N.J. Here is the relevant portion: When he owned a Fort Lee printing company called Advice Inc., Mr. Provenzano said he found out that a sales representative he employed had stolen $9,000. Mr. Provenzano sa

3、id he told the man that if he wanted to keep his employment, I would have to break his thumb. He said another Advice employee drove the sales representative to Holy Name Hospital in Teaneck, broke the thumb with a hammer outside the hospital, and then had a car service take the man home after the th

4、umb was repaired. Mr. Provenzano explained that he didnt want to set an example that workers could get away with stealing. The worker eventually paid back $4,500 and kept his job, he said. I know that youre thinking: This is an outrage. I, too, was shocked that Provenzano was being prosecuted for hi

5、s astute management. Indeed, I think his modest proposal has a lot to teach managers as they struggle with the problems of our people-centered business environment. Problems such as. Dealing with the bottom 10%. GE made the system famous, but plenty of companies are using it: Every year you get rid

6、of the worst-evaluated workers. Many managers object that this practice is inhumane, but not dealing with that bottom 10% leads to big performance problems. Provenzano found a kinder, gentler answer. After all, this employee would have been fired virtually anywhere else. But at Advice Inc., he staye

7、d on the job. And you know what? I bet he became a very, veryveryproductive employee. For most managers Provenzanos innovative response will be a welcome new addition to their executive tool kit. And by the way, executive tool kit is clearly more than just a metaphor at Advice Inc. Being the employe

8、r of choice. With top talent scarce everywhere, most companies now want to be their industrys or their communitys most desirable employer. Advice Inc. understood. The employee in question wasnt simply disciplined in his supervisors office and sent home. No, thats how an ordinary employer would have

9、done it. But at Advice Inc., another employeethe HR manager, perhaps? took time out his busy day and drove the guy right to the emergency room. And thenthe detail that says it allthe company provided a car service to drive the employee home. The message to talented job candidates comes through loud

10、and clear: Advice Inc. is a company that cares. Setting an example to others. An eternal problem for managers is how to let all employees know what happens to those who perform especially well or badly. A few companies actually post everyones salary and bonus on their intranet. But pay is so one-dim

11、ensional. At Advice Inc., a problem that would hardly be mentioned at most companiesembezzlement was undoubtedly the topic of rich discussions for weeks, at least until the employees cast came off. Any employee theft probably went way, waywaydown. When the great Roberto Goizueta was CEO of Coca-Cola

12、 he used to talk about this problem of setting examples and once observed, Sometimes you must have an execution in the public square! But of course he was speaking only figuratively. If he had just listened to his own words, Goizueta might have been an even better CEO. Differentiation. This is one o

13、f Jack Welch s favorite conceptsthe idea that managers should treat different employees very differently based on performance. Welch liked to differentiate with salary, bonus, and stock options, but now, in what must henceforth be known as the post-Provenzano management era, we can see that GEs grea

14、t management thinker just wasnt thinking big enough. This Times article is tantalizing and frustrating. In just a few sentences it opens a whole new world of management, yet much more surely remains to be told. We must all urge Provenzano to write a book explaining his complete managerial philosophy

15、.2. Read the following Chinese passage and then write an English summary of approximately 250 words that expresses its central ideas and main viewpoints (40 points, 50 minutes). 越是對原作體會深刻，越是欣賞原文的美妙，越覺得心長力絀，越覺得譯文遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)的傳達(dá)不出原作的神韻。返工的次數(shù)愈來愈多，時(shí)間也花得愈來愈多，結(jié)果卻總是不滿意。例如句子的轉(zhuǎn)彎抹角太生硬，色彩單調(diào)，說理強(qiáng)而描繪弱，處處都和我性格的缺陷與偏差有關(guān)。自然，我并

16、不因此灰心，照樣“知其不可為而為之”，不過要心情愉快也很難了。工作有成績才是最大的快樂：這一點(diǎn)你我都一樣。 另外有一點(diǎn)是肯定的，就是西方人的思想方式同我們距離太大了。不做翻譯工作的人恐怕不會體會到這么深切。他們刻畫心理和描寫感情的時(shí)候，有些曲折和細(xì)膩的地方，復(fù)雜繁瑣，簡直與我們格格不入。我們對人生瑣事往往有許多是認(rèn)為不值一提而省略，有許多只是羅列事實(shí)而不加分析的；如果要寫情就用詩人的態(tài)度來寫：西方作家卻多半用科學(xué)家的態(tài)度，歷史學(xué)家的態(tài)度(特別巴爾扎克)，像解剖昆蟲一般。譯的人固然懂得了，也感覺到它的特色，妙處，可是要叫思想方式完全不一樣的讀者領(lǐng)會就難了。思想方式反映整個(gè)的人生觀，宇宙觀，和幾千

17、年文化的發(fā)展，怎能一下子就能和另一民族的思想溝通呢?你很幸運(yùn)，音樂不像語言的局限那么大，你還是用音符表達(dá)前人的音符，不是用另一種語言文字，另一種邏輯。(傅雷家書)Part 2 Reading Comprehension (20 points, 20 minutes)In this section you will find after each of the passages a number of questions or unfinished statements about the passage, each with four (A, B, C and D) suggested ans

18、wers or ways of finishing. You must choose the one which you think fits best.PASSAGE 1To Err Is Humanby Lewis Thomas Everyone must have had at least one personal experience with a computer error by this time. Bank balances are suddenly reported to have jumped from $379 into the millions, appeals for

19、 charitable contributions are mailed over and over to people with crazy sounding names at your address, department stores send the wrong bills, utility companies write that theyre turning everything off, that sort of thing. If you manage to get in touch with someone and complain, you then get instan

20、taneously typed, guilty letters from the same computer, saying, Our computer was in error, and an adjustment is being made in your account. These are supposed to be the sheerest, blindest accidents. Mistakes are not believed to be the normal behavior of a good machine. If things go wrong, it must be

21、 a personal, human error, the result of fingering, tampering a button getting stuck, someone hitting the wrong key. The computer, at its normal best, is infallible. I wonder whether this can be true. After all, the whole point of computers is that they represent an extension of the human brain, vast

22、ly improved upon but nonetheless human, superhuman maybe. A good computer can think clearly and quickly enough to beat you at chess, and some of them have even been programmed to write obscure verse. They can do anything we can do, and more besides. It is not yet known whether a computer has its own

23、 consciousness, and it would be hard to find out about this. When you walk into one of those great halls now built for the huge machines, and standing listening, it is easy to imagine that the faint, distant noises are the sound of thinking, and the turning of the spools gives them the look of wild

24、creatures rolling their eyes in the effort to concentrate, choking with information. But real thinking, and dreaming, are other matters. On the other hand, the evidence of something like an unconscious, equivalent to ours, are all around, in every mail. As extensions of the human brain, they have be

25、en constructed the same property of error, spontaneous, uncontrolled, and rich in possibilities.Question 1: The title of the writing To Err Is Human implies that A. making mistakes is confined only to human beings. B. every human being cannot avoid making mistakes. C. all human beings are always mak

26、ing mistakes. D. every human being is born to make bad mistakes.Question 2: The first paragraph implies that A. computer errors are so obvious that one can hardly prevent them from happening. B. a computer is so capable of making errors that none of them is avoidable. C. computers make such errors a

27、s miscalculation and inaccurate reporting. D. computers cant think so their errors are natural and unavoidable.Question 3: The author uses his hypothesis that computers represent an extension of the human brain in order to indicate that A. human beings are not infallible, nor are computers. B. compu

28、ters are bound to make as many errors as human beings. C. errors made by computers can be avoided the same as human mistakes can be avoided. D. computers are made by human beings and so are their errors.Question 4: The rhetoric the author employed in writing the third paragraph, especially the sente

29、nce A good computer can think clearly and quickly enough to beat you at chess. is usually referred to in writing as A. climax. B. personification. C. hyperbole. D. onomatopoeia.Question 5: The author compared the faint and distant sound of the computer to the sound of thinking and regarded it as the

30、 product of A. dreaming and thinking. B. some property of errors. C. consciousness. D. possibilities.PASSAGE 2The Frugal Gourmet Cooks Americanby Jeff Smith Our real American foods have come from our soil and have been used by many groups those who already lived here and those who have come here to

31、live. The Native Americans already had developed an interesting cuisine using the abundant foods that were so prevalent. The influence that the English had upon our national eating habits is easy to see. They were a tough lot, those English, and they ate in a tough manner. They wiped theft mouths on

32、 the tablecloth, if there happened to be one, and they ate until you would expect them to burst. European travelers to this country in those days were most often shocked by American eating habits, which included too much fat and too much salt and too much liquor. Not much has changed! And, the Revol

33、utionists refused to use the fork since it marked them as Europeans. The fork was not absolutely common on the American dinner table until about the time of the Civil War, the 1860s. Those English were a tough lot. Other immigrant groups added their own touches to the preparation of our New World fo

34、od products. The groups that came still have a special sense of self-identity through their ancestral heritage, but they see themselves as Americans. This special self-identity through your ancestors who came from other lands was supposed to disappear in this country. The term melting pot was first

35、used in reference to America in the late 1700s, so this belief that we would all become the same has been with us for a long time. Thank goodness it has never worked. The various immigrant groups continue to add flavor to the pot, all right, but you can pick out the individual flavors easily. The la

36、rgest ancestry group in America is the English. There are more people in America who claim to have come from English blood than there are in England. But is their food English? Thanks be to God, it is not! It is American. The second largest group is the Germans, then the Irish, the Afro-Americans, t

37、he French, the Italians, the Scottish, and the Polish. The Mexican and American Indian groups are all smaller than any of the above, though they were the original cooks in this country.Question 6: Which of the following statements is nearly identical in meaning with the sentence they ate until you w

38、ould expect them to burst in the second paragraph? A. You bet they would never stop to eat till they are full. B. What you can expect is that they would not stop eating unless there was no more food. C. The only thing you would expect is that they wouldnt stop eating till they had had enough of the

39、food. D. the only thing is that they wouldnt stop eating till they felt sick.Question 7: Which of the following statements is Not true? A. English people had bad table manners. B. American food was exclusively unique in its flavors and varieties. C. American diet contained a lot of fat, salt and liq

40、uor. D. Europeans were not at all accustomed to the American way of eating.Question 8: The authors attitude towards American food is that A. American food is better than foods from other countries. B. American food is superior to European food. C. European food had helped enrich the flavors and vari

41、eties of American food. D. people from other countries could still identify from the American foods the foods that were unique to their countries.Question 9: Immigrant groups, when they got settled down in the United States, still have had their own sense of self-identity because A. their foods are

42、easily identified among all the foods Americans eat. B. their foods stand out in sharp contrast to foods of other countries. C. they know pretty well what elements of American food are of their own countries origin. D. they know pretty well how their foods contribute to American cuisine.Question 10:

43、 Which of the following statements is true? A. People from other cultures or nations start to lose their self-identity once they get settled down in America. B. The melting pot is supposed to melt all the foods but in reality it doesnt. C. The special sense of self-identity of people from other coun

44、tries cant be main- mined once they become Americans. D. The melting pot finds it capable of melting all the food traditions into the American tradition.參考答案及評分要點(diǎn)Part 1 Summary Writing1. (40 points)評分要點(diǎn)：1) 簡要描述該事件。普羅文扎諾讓人用錘子敲折了貪污的雇員的拇指，再請醫(yī)生接上，但沒有開除他。普羅文扎諾因此被起訴。作者覺得他的做法對于企業(yè)經(jīng)理大有教益。2) 在以人為本的經(jīng)營環(huán)境里，管理者面臨

45、以下問題： A如何對付表現(xiàn)最差的雇員。解雇評估結(jié)果最差的工人。普羅文扎諾的創(chuàng)舉將成為管理手段中的新內(nèi)容，“管理手段”不能是空話。 B如何成為人們首選的雇主。普羅文扎諾的做法向求職者傳遞了明白的信息：他的公司很講人道。 C如何殺一儆百。此舉可能會使雇員的貪污行為越來越少?？煽诳蓸饭厩笆紫瘓?zhí)行官持同樣觀點(diǎn)，但沒有實(shí)行。 D如何區(qū)別對待雇員。韋爾奇主張，經(jīng)理應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)雇員的不同表現(xiàn)給予不同的待遇；但與普羅文扎諾相比，這位管理大師的想象力還不夠豐富。3) 整體效果： A總結(jié)作者的真正意圖：許多企業(yè)管理有許多問題尚待解決，普羅文扎諾一案值得深思。 B文字精練、準(zhǔn)確，語句完整、通順，保留作者的詼諧口吻。 C語病、錯(cuò)別字、標(biāo)點(diǎn)使用不當(dāng)，倒扣分。2(40 points)評分要點(diǎn)：1) 核心信息：譯文難以傳達(dá)原作的神韻。2) 產(chǎn)生原因，如：東、西方思維方式的不同西方人的曲折細(xì)膩、復(fù)雜繁瑣與分析解剖，東方人的省略瑣事與不重分析等。3) 具體特點(diǎn)，如：譯文句子牛硬、色彩單調(diào)、說理強(qiáng)而描繪弱。4) 整體效果：文字精練、準(zhǔn)確；語句通順、無語??；標(biāo)點(diǎn)使用正確。Part 2 Reading Comprehension (20 points)1. B 2. A