版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
LITERATUREREVIEWLITERATUREREVIEWWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewdiscussespublishedinformationinaparticularsubjectarea,andsometimesinformationinaparticularsubjectareawithinacertaintimeperiod.Aliteraturereviewcanbejustasimplesummaryofthesources,butitusuallyhasanorganizationalpatternandcombinesbothsummaryandsynthesis.2Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?Asummaryisarecapoftheimportantinformationofthesource,butasynthesisisare-organization,orareshuffling,ofthatinformation.Itmightgiveanewinterpretationofoldmaterialorcombinenewwitholdinterpretations.Oritmighttracetheintellectualprogressionofthefield,includingmajordebates.Anddependingonthesituation,theliteraturereviewmayevaluatethesourcesandadvisethereaderonthemostpertinentorrelevant.3Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AsummaryisarecaWhatisLR?Theformatofareviewofliteraturemayvaryfromdisciplinetodisciplineandfromassignmenttoassignment.Areviewmaybeaself-containedunit--anendinitself--oraprefacetoandrationaleforengaginginprimaryresearch.Areviewisarequiredpartofgrantandresearchproposalsandoftenachapterinthesesanddissertations.Generally,thepurposeofareviewistoanalyzecriticallyasegmentofapublishedbodyofknowledgethroughsummary,classification,andcomparisonofpriorresearchstudies,reviewsofliterature,andtheoreticalarticles.4Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?TheformatofarevWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewistheeffectiveevaluationofselecteddocumentsonaresearchtopic.Areviewmayformanessentialpartoftheresearchprocessormayconstitutearesearchprojectinitself.Inthecontextofaresearchpaperorthesistheliteraturereviewisacriticalsynthesisofpreviousresearch.Theevaluationoftheliteratureleadslogicallytotheresearchquestion.5Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?6Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?6Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?Literaturereviewsprovideyouwithahandyguidetoaparticulartopic.Ifyouhavelimitedtimetoconductresearch,literaturereviewscangiveyouanovervieworactasasteppingstone.Literaturereviewsalsoprovideasolidbackgroundforaresearchpaper'sinvestigation.Comprehensiveknowledgeoftheliteratureofthefieldisessentialtomostresearchpapers.7Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturereviewWhywriteLR?Forprofessionals,theyareusefulreportsthatkeepthemuptodatewithwhatiscurrentinthefield.Forscholars,thedepthandbreadthoftheliteraturereviewemphasizesthecredibilityofthewriterinhisorherfield8Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ForprofessionalsWhywriteLR?Thepurposeofaliteraturereviewisforyoutotakeacriticallookattheliterature(factsandviews)thatalreadyexistsintheareayouareresearching.Aliteraturereviewisnotashoppinglistofeverythingthatexists,butacriticalanalysisthatshowsanevaluationoftheexistingliteratureandarelationshipbetweenthedifferentworks.Itdemonstratestherelevanceoftheresearch.9Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ThepurposeofaWhywriteLR?Literaturecanincludebooks,journalarticles,internet(electronicjournals),newspapers,magazines,thesesanddissertations,conferenceproceedings,reports,anddocumentaries.Literaturereviewsarewrittenoccasionallyinthehumanities,butmostlyinthesciencesandsocialsciences;inexperimentandlabreports,theyconstituteasectionofthepaper.Sometimesaliteraturereviewiswrittenasapaperinitself.10Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturecaninWhywriteLR?Inthecontextofaresearchpaperonathesis,theliteraturereviewprovidesabackgroundtothestudybeingproposed.Thebackgroundmayconsideroneormoreofthefollowingaspectsdependingontheresearchquestionbeingposed:Theoreticalbackground–past,presentorfutureClinicalpractice–previousorcontemporaryMethodologyand/orresearchmethodsPreviousfindingsRationaleand/orrelevanceofthecurrentstudy11Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InthecontextofWhywriteLR?Inabroadercontext
Hart(1998)liststhefollowingpurposesofareview:Distinguishingwhathasbeendonefromwhatneedstobedone;Discoveringimportantvariablesrelevanttothetopic;Synthesisingandgaininganewperspective;Identifyingrelationshipsbetweenideasandpractice;Establishingthecontextofthetopicorproblem;12Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InabroadercontWhywriteLR?Rationalisingthesignificanceoftheproblem;Enhancingandacquiringthesubjectvocabulary;Understandingthestructureofthesubject;Relatingideasandtheorytoapplications;Identifyingmethodologiesandtechniquesthathavebeenused;Placingtheresearchinahistoricalcontexttoshowfamiliaritywithstate-of-the-artdevelopments.13Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?RationalisingtheWhywriteLR?Itspurposeisto:PlaceeachworkinthecontextofitscontributiontotheunderstandingofthesubjectunderreviewDescribetherelationshipofeachworktotheothersunderconsiderationIdentifynewwaystointerpret,andshedlightonanygapsin,previousresearchResolveconflictsamongstseeminglycontradictorypreviousstudiesIdentifyareasofpriorscholarshiptopreventduplicationofeffortPointthewayforwardforfurtherresearchPlaceone'soriginalwork(inthecaseofthesesordissertations)inthecontextofexistingliterature14Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ItspurposeistoWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ClarifyIfyourassignmentisnotveryspecific,seekclarificationfromyoursupervisor/lecturer:Roughlyhowmanysourcesshouldyouinclude?Whattypesofsources(books,journalarticles,websites)?Shouldyousummarize,synthesize,orcritiqueyoursourcesbydiscussingacommonthemeorissue?Shouldyouevaluateyoursources?Shouldyouprovidesubheadingsandotherbackgroundinformation,suchasdefinitionsand/orahistory?15Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?FindmodelsLookforotherliteraturereviewsinyourareaofinterestorinthedisciplineandreadthemtogetasenseofthetypesofthemesyoumightwanttolookforinyourownresearchorwaystoorganizeyourfinalreview.Youcansimplyputtheword"review"inyoursearchenginealongwithyourothertopictermstofindarticlesofthistypeontheInternetorinanelectronicdatabase.Thebibliographyorreferencesectionofsourcesyou'vealreadyreadarealsoexcellententrypointsintoyourownresearch.16Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?NarrowyourtopicTherearehundredsoreventhousandsofarticlesandbooksonmostareasofstudy.Thenarroweryourtopic,theeasieritwillbetolimitthenumberofsourcesyouneedtoreadinordertogetagoodsurveyofthematerial.Yourinstructorwillprobablynotexpectyoutoreadeverythingthat'soutthereonthetopic,butyou'llmakeyourjobeasierifyoufirstlimityourscope.17Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ConsiderwhetheryoursourcesarecurrentSomedisciplinesrequirethatyouuseinformationthatisascurrentaspossible.Inthesciences,forinstance,treatmentsformedicalproblemsareconstantlychangingaccordingtothelateststudies.Informationeventwoyearsoldcouldbeobsolete.18Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?However,ifyouarewritingareviewinthehumanities,history,orsocialsciences,asurveyofthehistoryoftheliteraturemaybewhatisneeded,becausewhatisimportantishowperspectiveshavechangedthroughtheyearsorwithinacertaintimeperiod.Trysortingthroughsomeothercurrentbibliographiesorliteraturereviewsinthefieldtogetasenseofwhatyourdisciplineexpects.Youcanalsousethismethodtoconsiderwhatis"hot"andwhatisnot.19Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?FindafocusAliteraturereview,likeatermpaper,isusuallyorganizedaroundideas,notthesourcesthemselvesasanannotatedbibliographywouldbeorganized.Thismeansthatyouwillnotjustsimplylistyoursourcesandgointodetailabouteachoneofthem,oneatatime.No.20Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Asyoureadwidelybutselectivelyinyourtopicarea,considerinsteadwhatthemesorissuesconnectyoursourcestogether.Dotheypresentoneordifferentsolutions?Isthereanaspectofthefieldthatismissing?Howwelldotheypresentthematerialanddotheyportrayitaccordingtoanappropriatetheory?Dotheyrevealatrendinthefield?Aragingdebate?Pickoneofthesethemestofocustheorganizationofyourreview.21Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ConstructaworkingthesisstatementThenusethefocusyou'vefoundtoconstructathesisstatement.Yes!Literaturereviewshavethesisstatementsaswell!However,yourthesisstatementwillnotnecessarilyargueforapositionoranopinion;ratheritwillargueforaparticularperspectiveonthematerial.22Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Somesamplethesisstatementsforliteraturereviewsareasfollows:Thecurrenttrendintreatmentforcongestiveheartfailurecombinessurgeryandmedicine.Moreandmoreculturalstudiesscholarsareacceptingpopularmediaasasubjectworthyofacademicconsideration.23Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ConsiderorganizationYou'vegotafocus,andyou'venarroweditdowntoathesisstatement.Nowwhatisthemosteffectivewayofpresentingtheinformation?Whatarethemostimportanttopics,subtopics,etc.,thatyourreviewneedstoinclude?Andinwhatordershouldyoupresentthem?24Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Developanorganizationforyourreviewatbothaglobalandlocallevel:First,coverthebasiccategoriesJustlikemostacademicpapers,literaturereviewsalsomustcontainatleastthreebasicelements:anintroductionorbackgroundinformationsection;thebodyofthereviewcontainingthediscussionofsources;and,finally,aconclusionand/orrecommendationssectiontoendthepaper.25Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Introduction:Givesaquickideaofthetopicoftheliteraturereview,suchasthecentralthemeororganizationalpattern.Body:Containsyourdiscussionofsourcesandisorganizedeitherchronologically,thematically,ormethodologically(seebelowformoreinformationoneach).Conclusions/Recommendations:Discusswhatyouhavedrawnfromreviewingliteraturesofar.Wheremightthediscussionproceed?26Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Theintroductionshouldprovidethereaderwiththescaleandstructureofyourreview.Itservesasakindofmap.Thebodyofthereviewdependsonhowyouhaveorganisedyourkeypoints.Literaturereviewsatpostgraduatelevelshouldbeevaluativeandnotmerelydescriptive.Forexamplepossiblereasonsforsimilaritiesordifferencesbetweenstudiesareconsideredratherthanamereidentificationofthem.Theconclusionofthereviewneedstosumupthemainfindingsofyourresearchintotheliterature.Thefindingscanberelatedtotheaimsofthestudyyouareproposingtodo.Thereaderisthusprovidedwithacoherentbackgroundtothecurrentstudy.27Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?OrganizingthebodyOnceyouhavethebasiccategoriesinplace,thenyoumustconsiderhowyouwillpresentthesourcesthemselveswithinthebodyofyourpaper.Createanorganizationalmethodtofocusthissectionevenfurther.Tohelpyoucomeupwithanoverallorganizationalframeworkforyourreview,considerthesixtypicalwaysoforganizingthesourcesintoareview:Chronological
BypublicationBytrendThematicMethodologicalQuestionsforFurtherResearch28Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Similartoprimaryresearch,developmentoftheliteraturereviewrequiresfourstages:Problemformulation—whichtopicorfieldisbeingexaminedandwhatareitscomponentissues?Literaturesearch—findingmaterialsrelevanttothesubjectbeingexploredDataevaluation—determiningwhichliteraturemakesasignificantcontributiontotheunderstandingofthetopicAnalysisandinterpretation—discussingthefindingsandconclusionsofpertinentliterature29Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldyouwrite?theacceptedfactsintheareathepopularopinionthemainvariablestherelationshipbetweenconceptsandvariablesshortcomingsintheexistingfindingslimitationsinthemethodsusedintheexistingfindingstherelevanceofyourresearchsuggestionsforfurtherresearchinthearea.30Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?theacceWhatshouldyouwrite?Literaturereviewsshouldcomprisethefollowingelements:Anoverviewofthesubject,issueortheoryunderconsideration,alongwiththeobjectivesoftheliteraturereviewDivisionofworksunderreviewintocategories(e.g.thoseinsupportofaparticularposition,thoseagainst,andthoseofferingalternativethesesentirely)ExplanationofhoweachworkissimilartoandhowitvariesfromtheothersConclusionsastowhichpiecesarebestconsideredintheirargument,aremostconvincingoftheiropinions,andmakethegreatestcontributiontotheunderstandinganddevelopmentoftheirareaofresearch31Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?LiteratuWhatshouldyouwrite?Inassessingeachpiece,considerationshouldbegivento:Provenance—Whataretheauthor'scredentials?Aretheauthor'sargumentssupportedbyevidence(e.g.primaryhistoricalmaterial,casestudies,narratives,statistics,recentscientificfindings)?Objectivity—Istheauthor'sperspectiveeven-handedorprejudicial?Iscontrarydataconsideredoriscertainpertinentinformationignoredtoprovetheauthor'spoint?Persuasiveness—Whichoftheauthor'sthesesaremost/leastconvincing?Value—Aretheauthor'sargumentsandconclusionsconvincing?Doestheworkultimatelycontributeinanysignificantwaytoanunderstandingofthesubject?32Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?InassesWhatshouldyouwrite?LayoutMakeyourliteraturereviewhaveanacademicandprofessionalappearance.HerearesomepointstomakethelookofyourreportappealingtothereaderWhitespace:leavespacebetweensections,especiallyfromtheabstract.Thisgivesanunclutteredeffect.Headings/sub-headings:thesehelptoseparateideas.Textboxes:youcanusetheseforquotationsorparaphrasingtoseparatethemfromtherestofyourtext.Itisalsopleasingtotheeye.33Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?Layout33Whatshouldyouwrite?Graphics:centreyourgraphics,suchasdiagramsortables,tohavespacearoundthem.Trynottoburygraphicsinyourtext.Pagination:youcannumberpagesorsectionsorboth,buttheimportantthingtodoistobeconsistent.Thecoverpagenormallyisnotnumbered.Thecontentpageandabstractpageusuallyhaveaseparatenumberingsystemtothebodyofyourliteraturereview.34Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?GraphicsWhatshouldyouwrite?LanguagefocusCreateabalancebetweendirectquotation(citation)andparaphrasing.Avoidtoomuchdirectquoting.Theverbtensechosendependsonyouremphasis:Whenyouarecitingaspecificauthor'sfindings,usethepasttense:(found,demonstrated);Whenyouarewritingaboutanacceptedfact,usethepresenttense:(demonstrates,finds);andWhenyouarecitingseveralauthorsormakingageneralstatement,usethepresentperfecttense:(haveshown,havefound,littleresearchhasbeendone).35Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?LanguageWhatshouldyouwrite?FinalchecklistHaveIfulfilledthepurposeoftheliteraturereview?Isitwrittenatalevelappropriatetoitsaudience?Areitsfactscorrect?Isalltheinformationincludedrelevant?Arethelayoutandpresentationeasyontheeye?Isthelanguageclear,conciseandacademic?Doestheabstractsummarisetheentirereview?Doestheintroductionadequatelyintroducethetopic?Isthebodyorganisedlogically?Doestheconclusioninterpret,analyseandevaluate?Aretherecommendationsreasonable?Doesthetableofcontentscorrespondwiththeactualcontents?Arepagenumberscorrect?HaveIacknowledgedallsourcesofinformationthroughcorrectreferencing?HaveIcheckedspelling,grammarandpunctuation?HaveIcarefullyproof-readthefinaldraft?36Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?FinalchHowtoreview?Thewholeprocessofreviewingincludes: a.Searchingforliterature
b.Sortingandprioritisingtheretrievedliterature
c.Analyticalreadingofpapers
d.Evaluativereadingofpapers
e.Comparisonacrossstudies
f.Organisingthecontent
g.Writingthereview37Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?ThewholeprocesHowtoreview?ComparisonacrossstudiesTheaimistoextractkeypointsbycomparingandcontrastingACROSSstudies,insteadofreadingonepaperafteranother.Keypointsforareviewmayconcernareasofsimilaritiesand/ordifferencesin:Researchaim(s)orhypothesesResearchdesignandsamplingInstrumentsandproceduresusedHowdatawereanalysedResultsorfindingsInterpretations38Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?ComparisonacrosHowtoreview?Findsimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenstudiesatdifferentlevels,e.g.: -philosophy
-epistemology
-morality
-methodology
-methods
-typesofdata
-dataanalysis
-interpretation39Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?FindsimilaritieHowtoreview?Setoutyourthinkingonpaperthroughmapsandtrees.40Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?SetoutyourthiHowtoreview?Tipsonwriting41Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?Tipsonwriting4Howtoreview?Pitfalls -Vaguenessduetotoomuchorinappropriategeneralisations
-Limitedrange
-Insufficientinformation
-Irrelevantmaterial
-Omissionofcontrastingview
-Omissionofrecentwork42Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?Pitfalls42Dr.LExample Earlyworkshaveaddressedsomeoftheproblemsandissuesdiscussedinvideoretrieval.Researchershavedevelopedideasandtoolsforsupportingvideoediting,forexamplein[8].Theyhavedefinedaseamlessvideoeditinginthegradientdomain.Thespatio-temporalgradientfieldsoftargetvideosaremodifiedormixedtogenerateanewgradientfield,whichisusuallynotintegrateable.Theyhavealsodescribedhowsemanticinformationaboutvideocanbestructuredandusedforcontent-basedaccess.Fromageneralvideoarchivepointofview,theproblemwiththistoolisthelackofsupportformanagingvideodocumentstructures.Adigitalvideoarchiveservingdifferentcategoriesofusersshouldofferamorestructuredwayofdescribingvideocontents43Dr.LiliAnnExample EarlyworkshaveaddreExample HiddenMarkovModels(HMMs)arestatisticaltoolsthathavebeenusedsuccessfullyinmodellingdifficulttaskssuchasspeechrecognition[15]orbiologicalsequenceanalysis[16].Inspiredbyasimilarspeechapplication,HiddenMarkovmodel(HMM)hasalsobeenappliedtoactivityrecognition.ThefirstapproachforthehumanmovementsbasedonHMMswasdescribedin[13].Itdistinguishedbetweensixdifferenttennisstrokes.Thissystemdividedtheimageintomeshesandcountedthenumberofpixelsrepresentingthepersonforeachmesh.Thenumberswerecomposedtoafeaturevectorthatwasconvertedintoadiscretelabelbyavectorquantizer.ThelabelswereclassifiedbasedondiscreteHMMs.In[8],anHMMisusedasarepresentationofsimpleactionswhicharerecognizedbycomputingtheprobabilitythatthemodelproducesthevisualobservationsequence.In[14]layeredHMMswereproposedtomodelsinglepersonofficeactivitiesatvarioustimegranularities44Dr.LiliAnnExample HiddenMarkovModels(Example Mostoftheexistingworkreliesonusingonlyasinglesourceofinformation(example,eitheraudioorvisualtrackdataalone).In[4],theaveragevideoshotactivityandthedurationareusedasfeaturesforthecategorizationofmoviesaccordingtotheactions.Anactionscenewascharacterizedbytemporallylocalizedpropertiesofvideoshotswhichhavelittleornorecurringsimilarvisualcontents[5].Althoughthesevisualcharactersareundoubtedlygoodindicatorsofrapidlyevolvingactioncontents,theyarenotenoughtodeterminethedesiredaction.Ontheotherhand,audio-basedactiondetectionwasindependentlyperformedonthesoundtrackin[6].However,thisaudioalonemethodmayleadtomanypotentialfalsedetectedcasesbecausemanysoundsoftenmixdifferentnoisesandothersimilarbackgroundsound.45Dr.LiliAnnExample MostoftheexistingwExampleVideoPre-processingClassificationMotionGenreObjectEventShotColourFeatureExtractionEdgeFeatureExtractionObjectCameraLengthDurationColourHistogramEdgeDetectionEdgeClusteringPanZoomTranslationEdgeCountRule-basedclassifiersRecognitionresultFIGURE2.3SchematicdiagramforvideoclassificationSource:L.N.Abdullahetal.2005.46Dr.LiliAnnExampleVideoPre-processingClasExample47Dr.LiliAnnExample47Dr.LiliAnnLITERATUREREVIEWLITERATUREREVIEWWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewdiscussespublishedinformationinaparticularsubjectarea,andsometimesinformationinaparticularsubjectareawithinacertaintimeperiod.Aliteraturereviewcanbejustasimplesummaryofthesources,butitusuallyhasanorganizationalpatternandcombinesbothsummaryandsynthesis.49Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?Asummaryisarecapoftheimportantinformationofthesource,butasynthesisisare-organization,orareshuffling,ofthatinformation.Itmightgiveanewinterpretationofoldmaterialorcombinenewwitholdinterpretations.Oritmighttracetheintellectualprogressionofthefield,includingmajordebates.Anddependingonthesituation,theliteraturereviewmayevaluatethesourcesandadvisethereaderonthemostpertinentorrelevant.50Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AsummaryisarecaWhatisLR?Theformatofareviewofliteraturemayvaryfromdisciplinetodisciplineandfromassignmenttoassignment.Areviewmaybeaself-containedunit--anendinitself--oraprefacetoandrationaleforengaginginprimaryresearch.Areviewisarequiredpartofgrantandresearchproposalsandoftenachapterinthesesanddissertations.Generally,thepurposeofareviewistoanalyzecriticallyasegmentofapublishedbodyofknowledgethroughsummary,classification,andcomparisonofpriorresearchstudies,reviewsofliterature,andtheoreticalarticles.51Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?TheformatofarevWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewistheeffectiveevaluationofselecteddocumentsonaresearchtopic.Areviewmayformanessentialpartoftheresearchprocessormayconstitutearesearchprojectinitself.Inthecontextofaresearchpaperorthesistheliteraturereviewisacriticalsynthesisofpreviousresearch.Theevaluationoftheliteratureleadslogicallytotheresearchquestion.52Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?53Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?6Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?Literaturereviewsprovideyouwithahandyguidetoaparticulartopic.Ifyouhavelimitedtimetoconductresearch,literaturereviewscangiveyouanovervieworactasasteppingstone.Literaturereviewsalsoprovideasolidbackgroundforaresearchpaper'sinvestigation.Comprehensiveknowledgeoftheliteratureofthefieldisessentialtomostresearchpapers.54Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturereviewWhywriteLR?Forprofessionals,theyareusefulreportsthatkeepthemuptodatewithwhatiscurrentinthefield.Forscholars,thedepthandbreadthoftheliteraturereviewemphasizesthecredibilityofthewriterinhisorherfield55Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ForprofessionalsWhywriteLR?Thepurposeofaliteraturereviewisforyoutotakeacriticallookattheliterature(factsandviews)thatalreadyexistsintheareayouareresearching.Aliteraturereviewisnotashoppinglistofeverythingthatexists,butacriticalanalysisthatshowsanevaluationoftheexistingliteratureandarelationshipbetweenthedifferentworks.Itdemonstratestherelevanceoftheresearch.56Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ThepurposeofaWhywriteLR?Literaturecanincludebooks,journalarticles,internet(electronicjournals),newspapers,magazines,thesesanddissertations,conferenceproceedings,reports,anddocumentaries.Literaturereviewsarewrittenoccasionallyinthehumanities,butmostlyinthesciencesandsocialsciences;inexperimentandlabreports,theyconstituteasectionofthepaper.Sometimesaliteraturereviewiswrittenasapaperinitself.57Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturecaninWhywriteLR?Inthecontextofaresearchpaperonathesis,theliteraturereviewprovidesabackgroundtothestudybeingproposed.Thebackgroundmayconsideroneormoreofthefollowingaspectsdependingontheresearchquestionbeingposed:Theoreticalbackground–past,presentorfutureClinicalpractice–previousorcontemporaryMethodologyand/orresearchmethodsPreviousfindingsRationaleand/orrelevanceofthecurrentstudy58Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InthecontextofWhywriteLR?Inabroadercontext
Hart(1998)liststhefollowingpurposesofareview:Distinguishingwhathasbeendonefromwhatneedstobedone;Discoveringimportantvariablesrelevanttothetopic;Synthesisingandgaininganewperspective;Identifyingrelationshipsbetweenideasandpractice;Establishingthecontextofthetopicorproblem;59Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InabroadercontWhywriteLR?Rati
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年電梯門套安全性能提升與安裝合同2篇
- 2025年度個人教育培訓(xùn)貸款循環(huán)還款合同模板3篇
- 二零二五年度農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)勞務(wù)合作合同2篇
- 2025年度智能安防產(chǎn)品個人銷售代理合同范本4篇
- 2025版牧業(yè)信息化管理系統(tǒng)承包合同4篇
- 二零二五版?zhèn)€人貸款合同電子簽名與存證技術(shù)規(guī)范4篇
- 二零二五年度棉被產(chǎn)品環(huán)保認(rèn)證與綠色消費(fèi)推廣協(xié)議3篇
- 2025版城市綜合體項(xiàng)目泥水班組承包協(xié)議4篇
- 二零二五年度高端彩色打印服務(wù)外包合同模板4篇
- 二零二五年度出租車企業(yè)財務(wù)審計合同3篇
- 加強(qiáng)教師隊(duì)伍建設(shè)教師領(lǐng)域?qū)W習(xí)二十屆三中全會精神專題課
- 2024-2025學(xué)年人教版數(shù)學(xué)七年級上冊期末復(fù)習(xí)卷(含答案)
- 2024年決戰(zhàn)行測5000題言語理解與表達(dá)(培優(yōu)b卷)
- 四年級數(shù)學(xué)上冊人教版24秋《小學(xué)學(xué)霸單元期末標(biāo)準(zhǔn)卷》考前專項(xiàng)沖刺訓(xùn)練
- 2025年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球創(chuàng)議GOLD指南修訂解讀課件
- (完整版)減數(shù)分裂課件
- 銀行辦公大樓物業(yè)服務(wù)投標(biāo)方案投標(biāo)文件(技術(shù)方案)
- 第01講 直線的方程(九大題型)(練習(xí))
- 微粒貸逾期還款協(xié)議書范本
- 人教版七年級上冊數(shù)學(xué)全冊課時練習(xí)帶答案
- NBT 47013.4-2015 承壓設(shè)備無損檢測 第4部分:磁粉檢測
評論
0/150
提交評論