閱讀-政治經濟_第1頁
閱讀-政治經濟_第2頁
閱讀-政治經濟_第3頁
閱讀-政治經濟_第4頁
閱讀-政治經濟_第5頁
全文預覽已結束

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

閱讀----政治經濟Passage15Morethan8billionpeopleinaworldthatalreadyishavingtroublesupportingabout6billion-thatistheprospectnowbeingheldoutbypopulationexperts,anditfrightensthem.AnewprojectionbytheUnitedNationsshowsthat,ifthepresentgrowthrateof2percentperyearcontinues,today'sworldpopulationof6billionwillhit8billionbytheyear2020.What'smore,thegreatbulkofthegrowth-9ofevery10peopleaddedtotheearth'spopulation-willbeinthepoorer,undevelopedcountries.Thesearethenationswherefeedingbillionsofpeoplealreadyisprovinganearinsurmountablechallenge.Bytheyear2020,today's“havenot”nationswillhaveacombinedpopulationof6.5billionpeople,comprisingnearlyfourfifthsoftheworld'spopulation.Foodisn'ttheonlyproblemthatsuchapopulationexplosionpresents.Themorepeoplethereareandthemorecrowdedtheirlivingconditions,authoritieswarn,thegreatergrowsthelikelihoodofviolenceandupheaval.Toputthisgrowthinperspective,let'shaveaquickreviewofthehistoryofmankind.AtthetimeofChrist,millionsofyearsaftermanfirstappearedontheearth,demographersestimatetherewere250millionpeople.In1830,worldpopulationreached1billion.Ittookonly100moreyearstoaddanotherbilliontoworldpopulation;just30moretoaddathirdbillion.Thegrowthratewasexponential,andnowwehave6billionpeople.Actually,theworld'sbirthrateisonadecline.Butsoaredeathrates,asmedicaladvanceshaveincreasedlifespansandreducedinfantmortality.It'smainlyinadvancednationsthatpopulationgrowthisbeingcurbed.Theoutlookinthefuturecenturyisevenmorethreatening.Unlesspopulationgrowthiscurtailed,aworldpopulationof12billionisforeseeninacentury.Onequestionraisedbydemographers:Istheearthcapableofprovidingadecentlifefor12billionpeople?1.Ifthepresentannualgrowthratecontinues,theworldpopulationin2020willbemorethantoday's.A.8billionB.2percentC.2,000millionD.6billion2.AccordingtothepassagethatpopulationexplosionwillaffectallEXCEPTA.foodsupplyB.socialstabilityC.undevelopedcountries'livingconditionD.developedcountries'economy3.Thepopulationintheyearof1960is_.A.1billionB.2billionC.3billionD.4billion4.Whatdoes“curbed”inthelastparagraphmean?A.Limited.B.Curtailed.C.Cut.D.Accelerated.5.WhichofthefollowingstatementisNOTtrue?A.Thegrowthofpopulationispartlyduetomedicaladvances.B.Humanbeing'sdeathratesaredecreasing.C.Inacentury,theworld'spopulationwillincreaseby12billion.D.Inmostadvancedcountriesthebirthrateisonadecline.Passage16WhydidtheUnitedStatesbecomesodeeplyimmersedintheVietnamquagmire?Threedifferentexplanationshavebeenproposed.Thefirst,appraisingVietnaminthecontextoftheColdWar“containment”policy,portraystheSoutheastAsianwarassimplyanotherinstanceofAmericanresponsetothemenaceoftheCommunist"monolith(獨塊巨石).”HadtheUnitedStatesrefusedtoresisttheene哪inVietnam,othernationsofthefreeworldwouldhavelostfaithinAmerica'swillandwouldeventuallyhavefeltlike“dominoes"intotheSovietbloc(政治集團).AworldwidecycleofCommunistaggressionwouldthushavebeenencouraged,justasHitlerhadbeenencouragedbytheappeasers(綏靖者)atMunichis1938.TheofficialdefenseofAmericanpolicyatthetimeessentiallyrestedonthisexplanation.Thesecondexplanationdoesnotquestiontheanti-communistthrustofAmericanforeignpolicybutholdsthatVietnamwasamistakenapplicationofthatpolicy.Weshouldhaveknownbetter,thisargumentgoes,thantohavetakenoverfromtheFrenchtheirunwinnablewaragainstacolonialpeopleseekingtothrowoverboardWesterncontrol.Underratingofenemystrength,misguidedmilitarystrategy,andthefearofappearing“softoncommunism”haveallbeenadvancedasreasonswhyAmericanpolicymakerspursuedsuchanill-advisedcourse一ofaction.ThisviewcanbefoundintheworkofGeorgeHerringandJohnLewisGaddis.ThethirdinterpretationistheNewLeftrevisionistperspective,bestrepresentedbyGabrielKolko.ItmaintainsthattheVietnamWarwasbutthelogical(andnear-fatal)consequenceofU.S.“imperialism.”Inthisview,Americafeelsthatitmustresistallleft-leaningchallengestotheexistingworldordersoastoprotectitsaccesstooverseasmarketsandrawmaterials.Significantly,thisexplanationbearssomeresemblancetotheofficialdefenseofAmericanpolicy.ButNewLeftproponentsreversetheofficialvaluejudgmentbyholdingthatAmericaneconomicdomination,andevencapitalismitself,arenotworthpreserving.1.Whichoneofthefollowingbestsummarizesthispassage?A.VietnamWarwasaresultofmistakes.B.AmericaninvolvementinVietnamwasaresponsetoCommunistaggression.C.VietnamWarwasaconsequenceofU.S.imperialism.D.AmericaninvolvementinVietnamcanbeexplainedinthreedifferentways.2.America'sofficialexplanationforVietnamWaristhat_.A.Communistaggressionshouldbecurbed,otherwiseitwouldbeencouragedB.theU.S.musthelpVietnamtobuilddemocracyC.theU.S.wantedtoexpatriateanti-governmentmilitantsforthepoorcountryD.theU.S.cannotbearSovietUnion'sinvasionofVietnam3.WhichoneofthefollowingisNOTsuggestedasafactorinAmerica'sdecisiontotakeactioninVietnamA.Publicsupportathome.B.Underestimatingenemystrength.C.Fearofappearingasappeaser.D.Misguidedmilitarystrategy.4.Theword“proponent”(Paragraph3)mostprobablymeans_.A.opponentsB.componentsC.advocatesD.comrades5.ItcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatNewLeftrevisionist_.A.isagainstCapitalismB.isagainstAmericaneconomicdominationC.isagainstimperialismD.alloftheabovePassage15文章大意:本文介紹了當今世界嚴峻的人口增長形勢。聯合國的預測表明,如果保持目前2%的年增長率,到2020年世界人口將達到80億。人口學家(demographer)擔憂,已經不堪重負的地球能否給不斷增長的人口提供像樣的生活。題目注解:1.選C。由文章第一段可知,在文章寫成之時世界總人口為60億左右,如果保持當時的人口增長率,到2020年,世界人口將達到(hit)80億。所以到2020年,人口將增長20億。而在英語里,計數單位為十億(billion)、百萬(million)和千(thousand)。2billion就是2000million,C為正確選項。2.選D。由文章第二段可知,人口爆炸會影響食物供應,人口密集還容易引發(fā)暴力事件(violence)和動亂(upheaval),也就是說會影響社會穩(wěn)定。發(fā)展中國家的人口增長更是帶來嚴重的食品問題。所以A、B、C三項都是短文中提到的會受到人口爆炸影響的方面。只有D項文中沒有提到。3.選C。根據第三段“In1830,worldpopulationreached1billion.Ittookonly100moreyearstoaddanotherbilliontoworldpopulation;just30moretoaddathirdbillion”的表述做一個簡單的加法:1830年的10億加上到1930年增長的10億,再加上到1960年增加的10億,1960年世界人口是30億。故選C。4.選A。這是一個詞匯題??忌鸁o需知道curb的含義,仍能根據上下文猜出這個單詞的意思。5.選C。由文章最后一段可知,一個世紀后世界人口將達到120億,而不是增長(increaseby)120億。C的表述是錯誤的,所以選C。Passage16文章大意:本文提供了美國發(fā)動越南戰(zhàn)爭的三種解釋。一是為了遏制“共產主義”在全球的泛濫:如果美國對共產黨在越南的活動采取綏靖政策,其他國家將對美國失去信心,“多米諾骨牌”效應將使他們全部倒向蘇聯陣營。第二種解釋認為,發(fā)動越南戰(zhàn)爭是美國政策制定者的一個錯誤決定。第三種解釋認為,越南戰(zhàn)爭是美國推行帝國主義的結果:美國為確保其海外市場和原材料供應打壓一切左傾勢力。題目注解:1.選D。A、B、C三項分別概括了文中第二段、第一段和第三段的段落大意。D項是對全文的總結,本文主要列舉了美國發(fā)動越南戰(zhàn)爭的三種解釋。2.選A。文中第一段最后一句話寫到“TheofficialdefenseofAmericanpolicyatthetimeessentiallyrestedonthisexplanation"。這里的thisexplan

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論