版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1
ArtificialIntelligenceandtheFutureofTeachingandLearning
InsightsandRecommendations
May2023
ArtificialIntelligenceandtheFutureofTeachingandLearning
MiguelA.Cardona,Ed.D.
Secretary,U.S.DepartmentofEducation
RobertoJ.Rodríguez
AssistantSecretary,OfficeofPlanning,Evaluation,andPolicyDevelopment
KristinaIshmael
DeputyDirector,OfficeofEducationalTechnology
May2023
ExamplesAreNotEndorsements
Thisdocumentcontainsexamplesandresourcematerialsthatareprovidedfortheuser’sconvenience.Theinclusionofanymaterialisnotintendedtoreflectitsimportancenorisitintendedtoendorseanyviewsexpressedorproductsorservicesoffered.Thesematerialsmaycontaintheviewsandrecommendationsofvarioussubjectmatterexpertsaswellashypertextlinks,contactaddresses,andwebsitestoinformationcreatedandmaintainedbyotherpublicandprivateorganizations.TheopinionsexpressedinanyofthesematerialsdonotnecessarilyreflectthepositionsorpoliciesoftheU.S.DepartmentofEducation.TheU.S.DepartmentofEducationdoesnotcontrolorguaranteetheaccuracy,relevance,timeliness,orcompletenessofanyinformationfromothersourcesthatareincludedinthesematerials.Otherthanstatutoryandregulatoryrequirementsincludedinthedocument,thecontentsofthisguidancedonothavetheforceandeffectoflawandarenotmeanttobindthepublic.
ContractsandProcurement
Thisdocumentisnotintendedtoprovidelegaladviceorapprovalofanypotentialfederalcontractor’sbusinessdecisionorstrategyinrelationtoanycurrentorfuturefederalprocurementand/orcontract.Further,thisdocumentisnotaninvitationforbid,requestforproposal,orothersolicitation.
LicensingandAvailability
ThisreportisinthepublicdomainandavailableontheU.S.DepartmentofEducation’s
(Department’s)websiteat
.
RequestsforalternateformatdocumentssuchasBrailleorlargeprintshouldbesubmittedtotheAlternateFormatCenterbycalling1-202-260-0852orbycontactingthe504coordinatorvia
atom_eeos@.
NoticetoLimitedEnglishProficientPersons
IfyouhavedifficultyunderstandingEnglish,youmayrequestlanguageassistanceservicesforDepartmentinformationthatisavailabletothepublic.Theselanguageassistanceservicesareavailablefreeofcharge.Ifyouneedmoreinformationaboutinterpretationortranslationservices,pleasecall1-800-USA-LEARN(1-800-872-5327)(TTY:1-800-437-0833);emailusat
Ed.Language.Assistance@
;orwritetoU.S.DepartmentofEducation,InformationResourceCenter,LBJEducationBuilding,400MarylandAve.SW,Washington,DC20202.
HowtoCite
Whilepermissiontoreprintthispublicationisnotnecessary,thesuggestedcitationisasfollows:
U.S.DepartmentofEducation,OfficeofEducationalTechnology,ArtificialIntelligenceandFutureofTeachingandLearning:InsightsandRecommendations,Washington,DC,2023.
Thisreportisavailableat
TableofContents
Introduction1
RisingInterestinAIinEducation 1
ThreeReasonstoAddressAIinEducationNow 2
TowardPoliciesforAIinEducation 3
BuildingEthical,EquitablePoliciesTogether6
GuidingQuestions 6
Foundation1:CenterPeople(Parents,Educators,andStudents) 6
Foundation2:AdvanceEquity7
Foundation3:EnsureSafety,Ethics,andEffectiveness8
Foundation4:PromoteTransparency9
OverviewofDocument10
WhatisAI?11
Perspective:Human-LikeReasoning 12
Perspective:AnAlgorithmthatPursuesaGoal 12
Perspective:IntelligenceAugmentation14
Definitionof“Model”14
Insight:AISystemsEnableNewFormsofInteraction15
KeyRecommendation:HumanintheLoopAI16
Learning18
Insight:AIEnablesAdaptivityinLearning 18
IntelligentTutoringSystems:AnExampleofAIModels 19
ImportantDirectionsforExpandingAI-BasedAdaptivity20
ADuality:LearningWithandAboutAI22
AChallenge:SystemsThinkingAboutAIinEducation22
OpenQuestionsAboutAIforLearning23
KeyRecommendation:SeekAIModelsAlignedtoaVisionforLearning24
Teaching25
AlwaysCenterEducatorsinInstructionalLoops 25
Insight:UsingAItoImproveTeachingJobs 26
PreparingandSupportingTeachersinPlanningandReflecting29
Designing,Selecting,andEvaluatingAITools30
Challenge:BalancingHumanandComputerDecision-Making30
Challenge:MakingTeachingJobsEasierWhileAvoidingSurveillance31
Challenge:RespondingtoStudents’StrengthsWhileProtectingTheirPrivacy32
QuestionsWorthAskingAboutAIforTeaching34
KeyRecommendation:Inspectable,Explainable,OverridableAI34
FormativeAssessment37
BuildingonBestPractices 37
ImplicationsforTeachingandLearning 38
Insight:AICanEnhanceFeedbackLoops39
AnExample:AutomatedEssayScoring40
KeyOpportunitiesforAIinFormativeAssessment41
KeyRecommendation:HarnessAssessmentExpertisetoReduceBias42
RelatedQuestions43
ResearchandDevelopment44
Insight:ResearchCanStrengthentheRoleofContextinAI 44
AttentiontotheLongTailofLearnerVariability 46
PartnershipinDesign-BasedResearch47
Re-thinkingTeacherProfessionalDevelopment48
ConnectingwithPublicPolicy49
KeyRecommendation:FocusR&DonAddressingContext50
OngoingQuestionsforResearchers50
DesiredNationalR&DObjectives51
Recommendations52
Insight:AligningAItoPolicyObjectives 52
CallingEducationLeaderstoAction 53
Recommendation#1:EmphasizeHumansintheLoop53
Recommendation#2:AlignAIModelstoaSharedVisionforEducation54
Recommendation#3:DesignUsingModernLearningPrinciples56
Recommendation#4:PrioritizeStrengtheningTrust57
Recommendation#5:InformandInvolveEducators57
Recommendation#6:FocusR&DonAddressingContextandEnhancingTrustandSafety59
Recommendation#7:DevelopEducation-SpecificGuidelinesandGuardrails60
NextSteps60
CommonAcronymsandAbbreviations62
Acknowledgements63
References64
1
Introduction
TheU.S.DepartmentofEducation(Department)iscommittedtosupportingtheuseoftechnologytoimproveteachingandlearningandtosupportinnovationthroughouteducationalsystems.Thisreportaddressestheclearneedforsharingknowledgeanddevelopingpoliciesfor“ArtificialIntelligence,”arapidlyadvancingclassoffoundationalcapabilitieswhichareincreasinglyembeddedinalltypesofeducationaltechnologysystemsandarealsoavailabletothepublic.Wewillconsider“educationaltechnology”(edtech)toincludeboth(a)technologiesspecificallydesignedforeducationaluse,aswellas(b)generaltechnologiesthatarewidelyusedineducationalsettings.Recommendationsinthisreportseektoengageteachers,educationalleaders,policymakers,researchers,andeducationaltechnologyinnovatorsandprovidersastheyworktogetheronpressingpolicyissuesthatariseasArtificialIntelligence(AI)isusedineducation.
AIcanbedefinedas“automationbasedonassociations.”Whencomputersautomatereasoningbasedonassociationsindata(orassociationsdeducedfromexpertknowledge),twoshiftsfundamentaltoAIoccurandshiftcomputingbeyondconventionaledtech:(1)fromcapturingdatatodetectingpatternsindataand(2)fromprovidingaccesstoinstructionalresourcestoautomatingdecisionsaboutinstructionandothereducationalprocesses.Detectingpatternsandautomatingdecisionsareleapsinthelevelofresponsibilitiesthatcanbedelegatedtoacomputersystem.TheprocessofdevelopinganAIsystemmayleadtobiasinhowpatternsaredetectedandunfairnessinhowdecisionsareautomated.Thus,educationalsystemsmustgoverntheiruseofAIsystems.ThisreportdescribesopportunitiesforusingAItoimproveeducation,recognizeschallengesthatwillarise,anddevelopsrecommendationstoguidefurtherpolicydevelopment.
RisingInterestinAIinEducation
Today,manyprioritiesforimprovementstoteachingandlearningareunmet.Educatorsseektechnology-enhancedapproachesaddressingtheseprioritiesthatwouldbesafe,effective,andscalable.Naturally,educatorswonderiftherapidadvancesintechnologyineverydaylivescouldhelp.Likeallofus,educatorsuseAI-poweredservicesintheireverydaylives,suchasvoiceassistantsintheirhomes;toolsthatcancorrectgrammar,completesentences,andwriteessays;andautomatedtripplanningontheirphones.ManyeducatorsareactivelyexploringAItoolsastheyarenewlyreleasedtothepublic1.EducatorsseeopportunitiestouseAI-poweredcapabilitieslikespeechrecognitiontoincreasethesupportavailabletostudentswithdisabilities,multilinguallearners,andotherswhocouldbenefitfromgreateradaptivityandpersonalizationindigitaltoolsforlearning.TheyareexploringhowAIcanenablewritingorimprovinglessons,aswellastheirprocessforfinding,choosing,andadaptingmaterialforuseintheirlessons.
Educatorsarealsoawareofnewrisks.Useful,powerfulfunctionalitycanalsobeaccompaniedwithnewdataprivacyandsecurityrisks.EducatorsrecognizethatAIcanautomaticallyproduceoutputthatisinappropriateorwrong.TheyarewarythattheassociationsorautomationscreatedbyAImayamplifyunwantedbiases.Theyhavenotednewwaysinwhichstudentsmay
1WaltonFamilyFoundation(March1,2023).TeachersandstudentsembraceChatGPTforeducation.
/learning/teachers-and-students-embrace-chatgpt-for-education
2
representothers’workastheirown.Theyarewell-awareof“teachablemoments”andpedagogicalstrategiesthatahumanteachercanaddressbutareundetectedormisunderstoodbyAImodels.Theyworrywhetherrecommendationssuggestedbyanalgorithmwouldbefair.Educators’concernsaremanifold.EveryoneineducationhasaresponsibilitytoharnessthegoodtoserveeducationalprioritieswhilealsoprotectingagainstthedangersthatmayariseasaresultofAIbeingintegratedinedtech.
Todevelopguidanceforedtech,theDepartmentworkscloselywitheducationalconstituents.Theseconstituentsincludeeducationalleaders—teachers,faculty,supportstaff,andothereducators—researchers;policymakers;advocatesandfunders;technologydevelopers;communitymembersandorganizations;and,aboveall,learnersandtheirfamilies/caregivers.Recently,throughitsactivitieswithconstituents,theDepartmentnoticedasharpriseininterestandconcernaboutAI.Forexample,a2021fieldscanfoundthatdevelopersofallkindsoftechnologysystems—forstudentinformation,classroominstruction,schoollogistics,parent-teachercommunication,andmore—expecttoaddAIcapabilitiestotheirsystems.ThroughaseriesoffourlisteningsessionsconductedinJuneandAugust2022andattendedbymorethan700attendees,itbecameclearthatconstituentsbelievethatactionisrequirednowinordertogetaheadoftheexpectedincreaseofAIineducationtechnology—andtheywanttorolluptheirsleevesandstartworkingtogether.Inlate2022andearly2023,thepublicbecameawareofnewgenerativeAIchatbotsandbegantoexplorehowAIcouldbeusedtowriteessays,createlessonplans,produceimages,createpersonalizedassignmentsforstudents,andmore.Frompublicexpressioninsocialmedia,atconferences,andinnewsmedia,theDepartmentlearnedmoreaboutrisksandbenefitsofAI-enabledchatbots.AndyetthisreportwillnotfocusonaspecificAItool,service,orannouncement,becauseAI-enabledsystemsevolverapidly.Finally,theDepartmentengagedtheeducationalpolicyexpertiseavailableinternallyandinitsrelationshipswithAIpolicyexpertstoshapethefindingsandrecommendationsinthisreport.
ThreeReasonstoAddressAIinEducationNow
“IstronglybelieveintheneedforstakeholderstounderstandthecyclicaleffectsofAIandeducation.Byunderstandinghowdifferentactivitiesaccrue,wehavetheabilitytosupportvirtuouscycles.Otherwise,wewilllikelyallowviciouscyclestoperpetuate.”
—LydiaLiu
Duringthelisteningsessions,constituentsarticulatedthreereasonstoaddressAInow:
First,AImayenableachievingeducationalprioritiesinbetterways,atscale,andwithlowercosts.Addressingvariedunfinishedlearningofstudentsduetothepandemicisapolicypriority,andAImayimprovetheadaptivityoflearningresourcestostudents’strengthsandneeds.Improvingteachingjobsisapriority,andviaautomatedassistantsorothertools,AImayprovideteachersgreatersupport.AImayalsoenableteacherstoextendthesupporttheyoffertoindividualstudentswhentheyrunoutoftime.Developingresourcesthatareresponsivetotheknowledgeandexperiencesstudentsbringtotheirlearning—theircommunityandculturalassets—isapriority,andAImayenablegreatercustomizabilityofcurricularresourcestomeetlocalneeds.
3
Asseeninvoiceassistants,mappingtools,shoppingrecommendations,essay-writingcapabilities,andotherfamiliarapplications,AImayenhanceeducationalservices.
Second,urgencyandimportancearisethroughawarenessofsystem-levelrisksandanxietyaboutpotentialfuturerisks.Forexample,studentsmaybecomesubjecttogreatersurveillance.Someteachersworrythattheymaybereplaced—tothecontrary,theDepartmentfirmlyrejectstheideathatAIcouldreplaceteachers.Examplesofdiscriminationfromalgorithmicbiasareonthepublic’smind,suchasavoicerecognitionsystemthatdoesn’tworkaswellwithregionaldialects,oranexammonitoringsystemthatmayunfairlyidentifysomegroupsofstudentsfordisciplinaryaction.SomeusesofAImaybeinfrastructuralandinvisible,whichcreatesconcernsabouttransparencyandtrust.AIoftenarrivesinnewapplicationswiththeauraofmagic,buteducatorsandprocurementpoliciesrequirethatedtechshowefficacy.AImayprovideinformationthatappearsauthentic,butactuallyisinaccurateorlackingabasisinreality.Ofthehighestimportance,AIbringsnewrisksinadditiontothewell-knowndataprivacyanddatasecurityrisks,suchastheriskofscalingpatterndetectorsandautomationsthatresultin“algorithmicdiscrimination”(e.g.,systematicunfairnessinthelearningopportunitiesorresourcesrecommendedtosomepopulationsofstudents).
Third,urgencyarisesbecauseofthescaleofpossibleunintendedorunexpectedconsequences.WhenAIenablesinstructionaldecisionstobeautomatedatscale,educatorsmaydiscoverunwantedconsequences.Inasimpleexample,ifAIadaptsbyspeedingcurricularpaceforsomestudentsandbyslowingthepaceforotherstudents(basedonincompletedata,poortheories,orbiasedassumptionsaboutlearning),achievementgapscouldwiden.Insomecases,thequalityofavailabledatamayproduceunexpectedresults.Forexample,anAI-enabledteacherhiringsystemmightbeassumedtobemoreobjectivethanhuman-basedrésuméscoring.Yet,iftheAIsystemreliesonpoorqualityhistoricaldata,itmightde-prioritizecandidateswhocouldbringbothdiversityandtalenttoaschool’steachingworkforce.
Insummary,itisimperativetoaddressAIineducationnowtorealizekeyopportunities,preventandmitigateemergentrisks,andtackleunintendedconsequences.
TowardPoliciesforAIinEducation
The2023
AIIndexReport
fromtheStanfordInstituteforHuman-CenteredAIhasdocumentednotableaccelerationofinvestmentinAIaswellasanincreaseofresearchonethics,includingissuesoffairnessandtransparency.2Ofcourse,researchontopicslikeethicsisincreasingbecauseproblemsareobserved.Ethicalproblemswilloccurineducation,too.3Thereportfoundastrikinginterestin25countriesinthenumberoflegislativeproposalsthatspecificallyincludeAI.IntheUnitedStates,multipleexecutiveordersarefocusedonensuringAIistrustworthyandequitable,andtheWhiteHouseOfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicyhasintroduceda
2Maslej,N.,Fattorini,L.,BrynjolfssonE.,Etchemendy,J.,Ligett,K.,Lyons,T.,Manyika,J.,Ngo,H.,Niebles,J.C.,Parli,V.,Shoham,Y.,Wald,R.,Clark,J.andPerrault,R.,(2023).TheAIindex2023annualreport.StanfordUniversity:AIIndexSteeringCommittee,InstituteforHuman-CenteredAI.
3Holmes,W.&Porayska-Pomsta,K.(Eds.)(2022).Theethicsofartificialintelligenceineducation.Routledge.ISBN978-0367349721
4
BlueprintforanAIBillofRights
(Blueprint)4thatprovidesprinciplesandpracticesthathelpachievethisgoal.Theseinitiatives,alongwithotherAI-relatedpolicyactivitiesoccurringinboththeexecutiveandlegislativebranches,willguidetheuseofAIthroughoutallsectorsofsociety.
InEurope,theEuropeanCommissionrecentlyreleased
Ethicalguidelinesontheuseofartificial
intelligence(AI)anddatainteachingandlearningforeducators
.5
AIismovingfastandheraldingsocietalchangesthatrequireanationalpolicyresponse.Inadditiontobroadpoliciesforallsectorsofsociety,education-specificpoliciesareneededtoaddressnewopportunitiesandchallengeswithinexistingframeworksthattakeintoconsiderationfederalstudentprivacylaws(suchasthe
FamilyEducationalRightsandPrivacy
Act
,orFERPA),aswellassimilarstaterelatedlaws.AIalsomakesrecommendationsandtakesactionsautomaticallyinsupportofstudentlearning,andthuseducatorswillneedtoconsider
howsuchrecommendationsandactionscancomplywithlawssuchasthe
Individualswith
DisabilitiesEducationAct
(IDEA).Wediscussspecificpoliciesintheconcludingsection.
Figure1:ResearchaboutAIisgrowingrapidly.Otherindicators,suchasdollarsinvestedandnumberofpeopleemployed,showsimilartrends.
AIisadvancingexponentially(seeFigure1),withpowerfulnewAIfeaturesforgeneratingimagesandtextbecomingavailabletothepublic,andleadingtochangesinhowpeoplecreatetextand
4WhiteHouseOfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicy(October2022),BlueprintforanAIbillofrights:MakingautomatedsystemsworkfortheAmericanpeople.TheWhiteHouseOfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicy.
/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
5EuropeanCommission,Directorate-GeneralforEducation,Youth,SportandCulture.(2022).Ethicalguidelinesontheuseofartificialintelligence(AI)anddatainteachingandlearningforeducators,PublicationsOfficeoftheEuropean
Union.
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/153756
5
images6.TheadvancesinAIarenotonlyhappeninginresearchlabsbutalsoaremakingnewsinmainstreammediaandineducational-specificpublications.
ResearchershavearticulatedarangeofconceptsandframeworksforethicalAI7,aswellasforrelatedconceptssuchasequitable,responsible,andhuman-centeredAI.Listeningsessionparticipantscalledforbuildingontheseconceptsandframeworksbutalsorecognizedtheneedtodomore;participantsnotedapressingneedforguardrailsandguidelinesthatmakeeducationaluseofAIadvancessafe,especiallygiventhisacceleratingpaceofincorporationofAIintomainstreamtechnologies.Aspolicydevelopmenttakestime,policymakersandeducationalconstituentstogetherneedtostartnowtospecifytherequirements,disclosures,regulations,andotherstructuresthatcanshapeapositiveandsafefutureforallconstituents—especiallystudentsandteachers.
Policiesareurgentlyneededtoimplementthefollowing:
1.leverageautomationtoadvancelearningoutcomeswhileprotectinghumandecisionmakingandjudgment;
2.interrogatetheunderlyingdataqualityinAImodelstoensurefairandunbiasedpatternrecognitionanddecisionmakingineducationalapplications,basedonaccurateinformationappropriatetothepedagogicalsituation;
3.enableexaminationofhowparticularAItechnologies,aspartoflargeredtechoreducationalsystems,mayincreaseorundermineequityforstudents;and
4.takestepstosafeguardandadvanceequity,includingprovidingforhumanchecksandbalancesandlimitinganyAIsystemsandtoolsthatundermineequity.
6Sharples,M.&PérezyPérez,R.(2022).Storymachines:Howcomputershavebecomecreativewriters.Routledge.ISBN9780367751951
7Akgun,S.,Greenhow,C.(2022).Artificialintelligenceineducation:AddressingethicalchallengesinK-12settings.AIEthics,2,431–440./10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
6
BuildingEthical,Equitable
PoliciesTogether
Inthisreport,weaimtobuildonthelisteningsessionstheDepartmenthostedtoengageandinformallconstituentsinvolvedinmakingeducationaldecisionssotheycanprepareforandmakebetterdecisionsabouttheroleofAIinteachingandlearning.AIisacomplexandbroadtopic,andwearenotabletocovereverythingnorresolveissuesthatstillrequiremoreconstituentengagement.Thisreportisintendedtobeastartingpoint.
TheopportunitiesandissuesofAIineducationareequallyimportantinK-12,highereducation,andworkforcelearning.Duetoscopelimitations,theexamplesinthisreportwillfocusonK-12education.Theimplicationsaresimilaratalllevelsofeducation,andtheDepartmentintendsfurtheractivitiesin2023toengageconstituentsbeyondK-12schools.
GuidingQuestions
UnderstandingthatAIincreasesautomationandallowsmachinestodosometasksthatonlypeopledidinthepastleadsustoapairofbold,overarchingquestions:
1.Whatisourcollectivevisionofadesirableandachievableeducationalsystemthatleveragesautomationtoadvancelearningwhileprotectingandcenteringhumanagency?
2.Howandonwhattimelinewillwebereadywithnecessaryguidelinesandguardrails,aswellasconvincingevidenceofpositiveimpacts,sothatconstituentscanethicallyandequitablyimplementthisvisionwidely?
IntheLearning,Teaching,andAssessmentsectionsofthisreport,weelaborateonelementsofaneducationalvisiongroundedinwhattoday’slearners,teachers,andeducationalsystemsneed,andwedescribekeyinsightsandnextstepsrequired.Below,wearticulatefourkeyfoundationsforframingthesethemes.Thesefoundationsarisefromwhatweknowabouttheeffectiveuseofeducationaltechnologytoimproveopportunity,equity,andoutcomesforstudentsandalsorelatetothenewBlueprint.
Foundation1:CenterPeople(Parents,Educators,andStudents)
Education-focusedAIpoliciesatthefederal,state,anddistrictlevelswillbeneededtoguideandempowerlocalandindividualdecisionsaboutwhichtechnologiestoadoptanduseinschoolsandclassrooms.Considerwhatishappeningineverydaylives.ManyofususeAI-enabledproductsbecausetheyareoftenbetterandmoreconvenient.Forexample,fewpeoplewanttousepapermapsanymore;peoplefindthattechnologyhelpsusplanthebestroutetoadestinationmoreefficientlyandconveniently.Andyet,peopleoftendonotrealizehowmuchprivacytheyaregivingupwhentheyacceptAI-enabledsystemsintotheirlives.AIwillbringprivacyandotherrisksthatarehardtoaddressonlyviaindividualdecisionmaking;additionalprotectionswillbeneeded.
7
Thereshouldbeclearlimitsontheabilitytocollect,use,transfer,andmaintainourpersonaldata,includinglimitsontargetedadvertising.Theselimitsshouldputtheburdenonplatformstominimize
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年度旅游行業(yè)知識產權保護合同2篇
- 二零二五版二手房買賣合同電子存證及支付協(xié)議3篇
- 二零二五年高技能人才派遣與高端制造企業(yè)服務協(xié)議9篇
- 2025年數字經濟產業(yè)園區(qū)建設項目投標合作協(xié)議書模板3篇
- 二零二五年環(huán)保材料銷售與安裝施工合作協(xié)議3篇
- 2025年度馬鈴薯種植技術培訓與推廣服務合同4篇
- 2025年度房產交易稅費墊付服務合同4篇
- 二零二五年度高校教師專業(yè)發(fā)展聘用合同書范本3篇
- 2025版路燈養(yǎng)護與社區(qū)安全監(jiān)控服務合同3篇
- 二零二五版開發(fā)商購房合同(帶房產增值保值承諾)3篇
- 2023年保安公司副總經理年終總結 保安公司分公司經理年終總結(5篇)
- 中國華能集團公司風力發(fā)電場運行導則(馬晉輝20231.1.13)
- 中考語文非連續(xù)性文本閱讀10篇專項練習及答案
- 2022-2023學年度六年級數學(上冊)寒假作業(yè)【每日一練】
- 法人不承擔責任協(xié)議書(3篇)
- 電工工具報價單
- 反歧視程序文件
- 油氣藏類型、典型的相圖特征和識別實例
- 流體靜力學課件
- 顧客忠誠度論文
- 實驗室安全檢查自查表
評論
0/150
提交評論