人工智能與教學的未來 Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning -Insights and Recommendations -美國教育部教育技術辦公室-2023.5_第1頁
人工智能與教學的未來 Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning -Insights and Recommendations -美國教育部教育技術辦公室-2023.5_第2頁
人工智能與教學的未來 Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning -Insights and Recommendations -美國教育部教育技術辦公室-2023.5_第3頁
人工智能與教學的未來 Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning -Insights and Recommendations -美國教育部教育技術辦公室-2023.5_第4頁
人工智能與教學的未來 Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning -Insights and Recommendations -美國教育部教育技術辦公室-2023.5_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩120頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1

ArtificialIntelligenceandtheFutureofTeachingandLearning

InsightsandRecommendations

May2023

ArtificialIntelligenceandtheFutureofTeachingandLearning

MiguelA.Cardona,Ed.D.

Secretary,U.S.DepartmentofEducation

RobertoJ.Rodríguez

AssistantSecretary,OfficeofPlanning,Evaluation,andPolicyDevelopment

KristinaIshmael

DeputyDirector,OfficeofEducationalTechnology

May2023

ExamplesAreNotEndorsements

Thisdocumentcontainsexamplesandresourcematerialsthatareprovidedfortheuser’sconvenience.Theinclusionofanymaterialisnotintendedtoreflectitsimportancenorisitintendedtoendorseanyviewsexpressedorproductsorservicesoffered.Thesematerialsmaycontaintheviewsandrecommendationsofvarioussubjectmatterexpertsaswellashypertextlinks,contactaddresses,andwebsitestoinformationcreatedandmaintainedbyotherpublicandprivateorganizations.TheopinionsexpressedinanyofthesematerialsdonotnecessarilyreflectthepositionsorpoliciesoftheU.S.DepartmentofEducation.TheU.S.DepartmentofEducationdoesnotcontrolorguaranteetheaccuracy,relevance,timeliness,orcompletenessofanyinformationfromothersourcesthatareincludedinthesematerials.Otherthanstatutoryandregulatoryrequirementsincludedinthedocument,thecontentsofthisguidancedonothavetheforceandeffectoflawandarenotmeanttobindthepublic.

ContractsandProcurement

Thisdocumentisnotintendedtoprovidelegaladviceorapprovalofanypotentialfederalcontractor’sbusinessdecisionorstrategyinrelationtoanycurrentorfuturefederalprocurementand/orcontract.Further,thisdocumentisnotaninvitationforbid,requestforproposal,orothersolicitation.

LicensingandAvailability

ThisreportisinthepublicdomainandavailableontheU.S.DepartmentofEducation’s

(Department’s)websiteat

.

RequestsforalternateformatdocumentssuchasBrailleorlargeprintshouldbesubmittedtotheAlternateFormatCenterbycalling1-202-260-0852orbycontactingthe504coordinatorvia

email

atom_eeos@.

NoticetoLimitedEnglishProficientPersons

IfyouhavedifficultyunderstandingEnglish,youmayrequestlanguageassistanceservicesforDepartmentinformationthatisavailabletothepublic.Theselanguageassistanceservicesareavailablefreeofcharge.Ifyouneedmoreinformationaboutinterpretationortranslationservices,pleasecall1-800-USA-LEARN(1-800-872-5327)(TTY:1-800-437-0833);emailusat

Ed.Language.Assistance@

;orwritetoU.S.DepartmentofEducation,InformationResourceCenter,LBJEducationBuilding,400MarylandAve.SW,Washington,DC20202.

HowtoCite

Whilepermissiontoreprintthispublicationisnotnecessary,thesuggestedcitationisasfollows:

U.S.DepartmentofEducation,OfficeofEducationalTechnology,ArtificialIntelligenceandFutureofTeachingandLearning:InsightsandRecommendations,Washington,DC,2023.

Thisreportisavailableat

TableofContents

Introduction1

RisingInterestinAIinEducation 1

ThreeReasonstoAddressAIinEducationNow 2

TowardPoliciesforAIinEducation 3

BuildingEthical,EquitablePoliciesTogether6

GuidingQuestions 6

Foundation1:CenterPeople(Parents,Educators,andStudents) 6

Foundation2:AdvanceEquity7

Foundation3:EnsureSafety,Ethics,andEffectiveness8

Foundation4:PromoteTransparency9

OverviewofDocument10

WhatisAI?11

Perspective:Human-LikeReasoning 12

Perspective:AnAlgorithmthatPursuesaGoal 12

Perspective:IntelligenceAugmentation14

Definitionof“Model”14

Insight:AISystemsEnableNewFormsofInteraction15

KeyRecommendation:HumanintheLoopAI16

Learning18

Insight:AIEnablesAdaptivityinLearning 18

IntelligentTutoringSystems:AnExampleofAIModels 19

ImportantDirectionsforExpandingAI-BasedAdaptivity20

ADuality:LearningWithandAboutAI22

AChallenge:SystemsThinkingAboutAIinEducation22

OpenQuestionsAboutAIforLearning23

KeyRecommendation:SeekAIModelsAlignedtoaVisionforLearning24

Teaching25

AlwaysCenterEducatorsinInstructionalLoops 25

Insight:UsingAItoImproveTeachingJobs 26

PreparingandSupportingTeachersinPlanningandReflecting29

Designing,Selecting,andEvaluatingAITools30

Challenge:BalancingHumanandComputerDecision-Making30

Challenge:MakingTeachingJobsEasierWhileAvoidingSurveillance31

Challenge:RespondingtoStudents’StrengthsWhileProtectingTheirPrivacy32

QuestionsWorthAskingAboutAIforTeaching34

KeyRecommendation:Inspectable,Explainable,OverridableAI34

FormativeAssessment37

BuildingonBestPractices 37

ImplicationsforTeachingandLearning 38

Insight:AICanEnhanceFeedbackLoops39

AnExample:AutomatedEssayScoring40

KeyOpportunitiesforAIinFormativeAssessment41

KeyRecommendation:HarnessAssessmentExpertisetoReduceBias42

RelatedQuestions43

ResearchandDevelopment44

Insight:ResearchCanStrengthentheRoleofContextinAI 44

AttentiontotheLongTailofLearnerVariability 46

PartnershipinDesign-BasedResearch47

Re-thinkingTeacherProfessionalDevelopment48

ConnectingwithPublicPolicy49

KeyRecommendation:FocusR&DonAddressingContext50

OngoingQuestionsforResearchers50

DesiredNationalR&DObjectives51

Recommendations52

Insight:AligningAItoPolicyObjectives 52

CallingEducationLeaderstoAction 53

Recommendation#1:EmphasizeHumansintheLoop53

Recommendation#2:AlignAIModelstoaSharedVisionforEducation54

Recommendation#3:DesignUsingModernLearningPrinciples56

Recommendation#4:PrioritizeStrengtheningTrust57

Recommendation#5:InformandInvolveEducators57

Recommendation#6:FocusR&DonAddressingContextandEnhancingTrustandSafety59

Recommendation#7:DevelopEducation-SpecificGuidelinesandGuardrails60

NextSteps60

CommonAcronymsandAbbreviations62

Acknowledgements63

References64

1

Introduction

TheU.S.DepartmentofEducation(Department)iscommittedtosupportingtheuseoftechnologytoimproveteachingandlearningandtosupportinnovationthroughouteducationalsystems.Thisreportaddressestheclearneedforsharingknowledgeanddevelopingpoliciesfor“ArtificialIntelligence,”arapidlyadvancingclassoffoundationalcapabilitieswhichareincreasinglyembeddedinalltypesofeducationaltechnologysystemsandarealsoavailabletothepublic.Wewillconsider“educationaltechnology”(edtech)toincludeboth(a)technologiesspecificallydesignedforeducationaluse,aswellas(b)generaltechnologiesthatarewidelyusedineducationalsettings.Recommendationsinthisreportseektoengageteachers,educationalleaders,policymakers,researchers,andeducationaltechnologyinnovatorsandprovidersastheyworktogetheronpressingpolicyissuesthatariseasArtificialIntelligence(AI)isusedineducation.

AIcanbedefinedas“automationbasedonassociations.”Whencomputersautomatereasoningbasedonassociationsindata(orassociationsdeducedfromexpertknowledge),twoshiftsfundamentaltoAIoccurandshiftcomputingbeyondconventionaledtech:(1)fromcapturingdatatodetectingpatternsindataand(2)fromprovidingaccesstoinstructionalresourcestoautomatingdecisionsaboutinstructionandothereducationalprocesses.Detectingpatternsandautomatingdecisionsareleapsinthelevelofresponsibilitiesthatcanbedelegatedtoacomputersystem.TheprocessofdevelopinganAIsystemmayleadtobiasinhowpatternsaredetectedandunfairnessinhowdecisionsareautomated.Thus,educationalsystemsmustgoverntheiruseofAIsystems.ThisreportdescribesopportunitiesforusingAItoimproveeducation,recognizeschallengesthatwillarise,anddevelopsrecommendationstoguidefurtherpolicydevelopment.

RisingInterestinAIinEducation

Today,manyprioritiesforimprovementstoteachingandlearningareunmet.Educatorsseektechnology-enhancedapproachesaddressingtheseprioritiesthatwouldbesafe,effective,andscalable.Naturally,educatorswonderiftherapidadvancesintechnologyineverydaylivescouldhelp.Likeallofus,educatorsuseAI-poweredservicesintheireverydaylives,suchasvoiceassistantsintheirhomes;toolsthatcancorrectgrammar,completesentences,andwriteessays;andautomatedtripplanningontheirphones.ManyeducatorsareactivelyexploringAItoolsastheyarenewlyreleasedtothepublic1.EducatorsseeopportunitiestouseAI-poweredcapabilitieslikespeechrecognitiontoincreasethesupportavailabletostudentswithdisabilities,multilinguallearners,andotherswhocouldbenefitfromgreateradaptivityandpersonalizationindigitaltoolsforlearning.TheyareexploringhowAIcanenablewritingorimprovinglessons,aswellastheirprocessforfinding,choosing,andadaptingmaterialforuseintheirlessons.

Educatorsarealsoawareofnewrisks.Useful,powerfulfunctionalitycanalsobeaccompaniedwithnewdataprivacyandsecurityrisks.EducatorsrecognizethatAIcanautomaticallyproduceoutputthatisinappropriateorwrong.TheyarewarythattheassociationsorautomationscreatedbyAImayamplifyunwantedbiases.Theyhavenotednewwaysinwhichstudentsmay

1WaltonFamilyFoundation(March1,2023).TeachersandstudentsembraceChatGPTforeducation.

/learning/teachers-and-students-embrace-chatgpt-for-education

2

representothers’workastheirown.Theyarewell-awareof“teachablemoments”andpedagogicalstrategiesthatahumanteachercanaddressbutareundetectedormisunderstoodbyAImodels.Theyworrywhetherrecommendationssuggestedbyanalgorithmwouldbefair.Educators’concernsaremanifold.EveryoneineducationhasaresponsibilitytoharnessthegoodtoserveeducationalprioritieswhilealsoprotectingagainstthedangersthatmayariseasaresultofAIbeingintegratedinedtech.

Todevelopguidanceforedtech,theDepartmentworkscloselywitheducationalconstituents.Theseconstituentsincludeeducationalleaders—teachers,faculty,supportstaff,andothereducators—researchers;policymakers;advocatesandfunders;technologydevelopers;communitymembersandorganizations;and,aboveall,learnersandtheirfamilies/caregivers.Recently,throughitsactivitieswithconstituents,theDepartmentnoticedasharpriseininterestandconcernaboutAI.Forexample,a2021fieldscanfoundthatdevelopersofallkindsoftechnologysystems—forstudentinformation,classroominstruction,schoollogistics,parent-teachercommunication,andmore—expecttoaddAIcapabilitiestotheirsystems.ThroughaseriesoffourlisteningsessionsconductedinJuneandAugust2022andattendedbymorethan700attendees,itbecameclearthatconstituentsbelievethatactionisrequirednowinordertogetaheadoftheexpectedincreaseofAIineducationtechnology—andtheywanttorolluptheirsleevesandstartworkingtogether.Inlate2022andearly2023,thepublicbecameawareofnewgenerativeAIchatbotsandbegantoexplorehowAIcouldbeusedtowriteessays,createlessonplans,produceimages,createpersonalizedassignmentsforstudents,andmore.Frompublicexpressioninsocialmedia,atconferences,andinnewsmedia,theDepartmentlearnedmoreaboutrisksandbenefitsofAI-enabledchatbots.AndyetthisreportwillnotfocusonaspecificAItool,service,orannouncement,becauseAI-enabledsystemsevolverapidly.Finally,theDepartmentengagedtheeducationalpolicyexpertiseavailableinternallyandinitsrelationshipswithAIpolicyexpertstoshapethefindingsandrecommendationsinthisreport.

ThreeReasonstoAddressAIinEducationNow

“IstronglybelieveintheneedforstakeholderstounderstandthecyclicaleffectsofAIandeducation.Byunderstandinghowdifferentactivitiesaccrue,wehavetheabilitytosupportvirtuouscycles.Otherwise,wewilllikelyallowviciouscyclestoperpetuate.”

—LydiaLiu

Duringthelisteningsessions,constituentsarticulatedthreereasonstoaddressAInow:

First,AImayenableachievingeducationalprioritiesinbetterways,atscale,andwithlowercosts.Addressingvariedunfinishedlearningofstudentsduetothepandemicisapolicypriority,andAImayimprovetheadaptivityoflearningresourcestostudents’strengthsandneeds.Improvingteachingjobsisapriority,andviaautomatedassistantsorothertools,AImayprovideteachersgreatersupport.AImayalsoenableteacherstoextendthesupporttheyoffertoindividualstudentswhentheyrunoutoftime.Developingresourcesthatareresponsivetotheknowledgeandexperiencesstudentsbringtotheirlearning—theircommunityandculturalassets—isapriority,andAImayenablegreatercustomizabilityofcurricularresourcestomeetlocalneeds.

3

Asseeninvoiceassistants,mappingtools,shoppingrecommendations,essay-writingcapabilities,andotherfamiliarapplications,AImayenhanceeducationalservices.

Second,urgencyandimportancearisethroughawarenessofsystem-levelrisksandanxietyaboutpotentialfuturerisks.Forexample,studentsmaybecomesubjecttogreatersurveillance.Someteachersworrythattheymaybereplaced—tothecontrary,theDepartmentfirmlyrejectstheideathatAIcouldreplaceteachers.Examplesofdiscriminationfromalgorithmicbiasareonthepublic’smind,suchasavoicerecognitionsystemthatdoesn’tworkaswellwithregionaldialects,oranexammonitoringsystemthatmayunfairlyidentifysomegroupsofstudentsfordisciplinaryaction.SomeusesofAImaybeinfrastructuralandinvisible,whichcreatesconcernsabouttransparencyandtrust.AIoftenarrivesinnewapplicationswiththeauraofmagic,buteducatorsandprocurementpoliciesrequirethatedtechshowefficacy.AImayprovideinformationthatappearsauthentic,butactuallyisinaccurateorlackingabasisinreality.Ofthehighestimportance,AIbringsnewrisksinadditiontothewell-knowndataprivacyanddatasecurityrisks,suchastheriskofscalingpatterndetectorsandautomationsthatresultin“algorithmicdiscrimination”(e.g.,systematicunfairnessinthelearningopportunitiesorresourcesrecommendedtosomepopulationsofstudents).

Third,urgencyarisesbecauseofthescaleofpossibleunintendedorunexpectedconsequences.WhenAIenablesinstructionaldecisionstobeautomatedatscale,educatorsmaydiscoverunwantedconsequences.Inasimpleexample,ifAIadaptsbyspeedingcurricularpaceforsomestudentsandbyslowingthepaceforotherstudents(basedonincompletedata,poortheories,orbiasedassumptionsaboutlearning),achievementgapscouldwiden.Insomecases,thequalityofavailabledatamayproduceunexpectedresults.Forexample,anAI-enabledteacherhiringsystemmightbeassumedtobemoreobjectivethanhuman-basedrésuméscoring.Yet,iftheAIsystemreliesonpoorqualityhistoricaldata,itmightde-prioritizecandidateswhocouldbringbothdiversityandtalenttoaschool’steachingworkforce.

Insummary,itisimperativetoaddressAIineducationnowtorealizekeyopportunities,preventandmitigateemergentrisks,andtackleunintendedconsequences.

TowardPoliciesforAIinEducation

The2023

AIIndexReport

fromtheStanfordInstituteforHuman-CenteredAIhasdocumentednotableaccelerationofinvestmentinAIaswellasanincreaseofresearchonethics,includingissuesoffairnessandtransparency.2Ofcourse,researchontopicslikeethicsisincreasingbecauseproblemsareobserved.Ethicalproblemswilloccurineducation,too.3Thereportfoundastrikinginterestin25countriesinthenumberoflegislativeproposalsthatspecificallyincludeAI.IntheUnitedStates,multipleexecutiveordersarefocusedonensuringAIistrustworthyandequitable,andtheWhiteHouseOfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicyhasintroduceda

2Maslej,N.,Fattorini,L.,BrynjolfssonE.,Etchemendy,J.,Ligett,K.,Lyons,T.,Manyika,J.,Ngo,H.,Niebles,J.C.,Parli,V.,Shoham,Y.,Wald,R.,Clark,J.andPerrault,R.,(2023).TheAIindex2023annualreport.StanfordUniversity:AIIndexSteeringCommittee,InstituteforHuman-CenteredAI.

3Holmes,W.&Porayska-Pomsta,K.(Eds.)(2022).Theethicsofartificialintelligenceineducation.Routledge.ISBN978-0367349721

4

BlueprintforanAIBillofRights

(Blueprint)4thatprovidesprinciplesandpracticesthathelpachievethisgoal.Theseinitiatives,alongwithotherAI-relatedpolicyactivitiesoccurringinboththeexecutiveandlegislativebranches,willguidetheuseofAIthroughoutallsectorsofsociety.

InEurope,theEuropeanCommissionrecentlyreleased

Ethicalguidelinesontheuseofartificial

intelligence(AI)anddatainteachingandlearningforeducators

.5

AIismovingfastandheraldingsocietalchangesthatrequireanationalpolicyresponse.Inadditiontobroadpoliciesforallsectorsofsociety,education-specificpoliciesareneededtoaddressnewopportunitiesandchallengeswithinexistingframeworksthattakeintoconsiderationfederalstudentprivacylaws(suchasthe

FamilyEducationalRightsandPrivacy

Act

,orFERPA),aswellassimilarstaterelatedlaws.AIalsomakesrecommendationsandtakesactionsautomaticallyinsupportofstudentlearning,andthuseducatorswillneedtoconsider

howsuchrecommendationsandactionscancomplywithlawssuchasthe

Individualswith

DisabilitiesEducationAct

(IDEA).Wediscussspecificpoliciesintheconcludingsection.

Figure1:ResearchaboutAIisgrowingrapidly.Otherindicators,suchasdollarsinvestedandnumberofpeopleemployed,showsimilartrends.

AIisadvancingexponentially(seeFigure1),withpowerfulnewAIfeaturesforgeneratingimagesandtextbecomingavailabletothepublic,andleadingtochangesinhowpeoplecreatetextand

4WhiteHouseOfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicy(October2022),BlueprintforanAIbillofrights:MakingautomatedsystemsworkfortheAmericanpeople.TheWhiteHouseOfficeofScienceandTechnologyPolicy.

/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/

5EuropeanCommission,Directorate-GeneralforEducation,Youth,SportandCulture.(2022).Ethicalguidelinesontheuseofartificialintelligence(AI)anddatainteachingandlearningforeducators,PublicationsOfficeoftheEuropean

Union.

https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/153756

5

images6.TheadvancesinAIarenotonlyhappeninginresearchlabsbutalsoaremakingnewsinmainstreammediaandineducational-specificpublications.

ResearchershavearticulatedarangeofconceptsandframeworksforethicalAI7,aswellasforrelatedconceptssuchasequitable,responsible,andhuman-centeredAI.Listeningsessionparticipantscalledforbuildingontheseconceptsandframeworksbutalsorecognizedtheneedtodomore;participantsnotedapressingneedforguardrailsandguidelinesthatmakeeducationaluseofAIadvancessafe,especiallygiventhisacceleratingpaceofincorporationofAIintomainstreamtechnologies.Aspolicydevelopmenttakestime,policymakersandeducationalconstituentstogetherneedtostartnowtospecifytherequirements,disclosures,regulations,andotherstructuresthatcanshapeapositiveandsafefutureforallconstituents—especiallystudentsandteachers.

Policiesareurgentlyneededtoimplementthefollowing:

1.leverageautomationtoadvancelearningoutcomeswhileprotectinghumandecisionmakingandjudgment;

2.interrogatetheunderlyingdataqualityinAImodelstoensurefairandunbiasedpatternrecognitionanddecisionmakingineducationalapplications,basedonaccurateinformationappropriatetothepedagogicalsituation;

3.enableexaminationofhowparticularAItechnologies,aspartoflargeredtechoreducationalsystems,mayincreaseorundermineequityforstudents;and

4.takestepstosafeguardandadvanceequity,includingprovidingforhumanchecksandbalancesandlimitinganyAIsystemsandtoolsthatundermineequity.

6Sharples,M.&PérezyPérez,R.(2022).Storymachines:Howcomputershavebecomecreativewriters.Routledge.ISBN9780367751951

7Akgun,S.,Greenhow,C.(2022).Artificialintelligenceineducation:AddressingethicalchallengesinK-12settings.AIEthics,2,431–440./10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

6

BuildingEthical,Equitable

PoliciesTogether

Inthisreport,weaimtobuildonthelisteningsessionstheDepartmenthostedtoengageandinformallconstituentsinvolvedinmakingeducationaldecisionssotheycanprepareforandmakebetterdecisionsabouttheroleofAIinteachingandlearning.AIisacomplexandbroadtopic,andwearenotabletocovereverythingnorresolveissuesthatstillrequiremoreconstituentengagement.Thisreportisintendedtobeastartingpoint.

TheopportunitiesandissuesofAIineducationareequallyimportantinK-12,highereducation,andworkforcelearning.Duetoscopelimitations,theexamplesinthisreportwillfocusonK-12education.Theimplicationsaresimilaratalllevelsofeducation,andtheDepartmentintendsfurtheractivitiesin2023toengageconstituentsbeyondK-12schools.

GuidingQuestions

UnderstandingthatAIincreasesautomationandallowsmachinestodosometasksthatonlypeopledidinthepastleadsustoapairofbold,overarchingquestions:

1.Whatisourcollectivevisionofadesirableandachievableeducationalsystemthatleveragesautomationtoadvancelearningwhileprotectingandcenteringhumanagency?

2.Howandonwhattimelinewillwebereadywithnecessaryguidelinesandguardrails,aswellasconvincingevidenceofpositiveimpacts,sothatconstituentscanethicallyandequitablyimplementthisvisionwidely?

IntheLearning,Teaching,andAssessmentsectionsofthisreport,weelaborateonelementsofaneducationalvisiongroundedinwhattoday’slearners,teachers,andeducationalsystemsneed,andwedescribekeyinsightsandnextstepsrequired.Below,wearticulatefourkeyfoundationsforframingthesethemes.Thesefoundationsarisefromwhatweknowabouttheeffectiveuseofeducationaltechnologytoimproveopportunity,equity,andoutcomesforstudentsandalsorelatetothenewBlueprint.

Foundation1:CenterPeople(Parents,Educators,andStudents)

Education-focusedAIpoliciesatthefederal,state,anddistrictlevelswillbeneededtoguideandempowerlocalandindividualdecisionsaboutwhichtechnologiestoadoptanduseinschoolsandclassrooms.Considerwhatishappeningineverydaylives.ManyofususeAI-enabledproductsbecausetheyareoftenbetterandmoreconvenient.Forexample,fewpeoplewanttousepapermapsanymore;peoplefindthattechnologyhelpsusplanthebestroutetoadestinationmoreefficientlyandconveniently.Andyet,peopleoftendonotrealizehowmuchprivacytheyaregivingupwhentheyacceptAI-enabledsystemsintotheirlives.AIwillbringprivacyandotherrisksthatarehardtoaddressonlyviaindividualdecisionmaking;additionalprotectionswillbeneeded.

7

Thereshouldbeclearlimitsontheabilitytocollect,use,transfer,andmaintainourpersonaldata,includinglimitsontargetedadvertising.Theselimitsshouldputtheburdenonplatformstominimize

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論