




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
TheEffectsofImmigrationonEntrepreneurshipandInnovation
RobertKrol
MERCATUSWORKINGPAPER
AllstudiesintheMercatusWorkingPaperserieshavefollowedarigorousprocessofacademicevaluation,including(exceptwhereotherwisenoted)atleastonedouble-blindpeerreview.WorkingPaperspresentanauthor’sprovisionalfindings,which,uponfurtherconsiderationandrevision,arelikelytoberepublishedinanacademicjournal.TheopinionsexpressedinMercatusWorkingPapersaretheauthors’anddonotrepresentofficialpositionsoftheMercatusCenterorGeorgeMasonUniversity.
RobertKrol,“TheEffectsofImmigrationonEntrepreneurshipandInnovation.”WorkingPaper,MercatusCenteratGeorgeMasonUniversity,Arlington,VA,May2021.
Abstract
Thispaperreviewsevidenceabouttheeffectsofimmigrationonentrepreneurshipandinnovation.ThenumberofimmigrantshasincreasedbothinabsolutenumbersandasashareoftheUSpopulation.ThecountriesoforiginhaveshiftedfromEuropetoLatinAmericaandAsia.Theshareofhigher-skilledimmigrantshasrisen,whiletheshareoflower-skilledimmigrantshasdeclined.ImmigrantstendtobeentrepreneurialandtostartasignificantshareofUSbusinesses.ThosenewfirmsmakeasignificantcontributiontoemploymentgrowthintheUnitedStates.Researchindicatesthatimmigrantstendtobeinnovative.Thisfindingispartiallytheresultofalargepercentageofimmigrantswithscience,technology,engineering,andmath(STEM)degrees.TheshareofUSpatentsgoingtoimmigrantshassignificantlyincreasedovertime.Immigrantinventorsareacomplementtonativeinventors,thusraisingtotalproductivityovertime.
JELcodes:J6,03
Keywords:immigration,entrepreneurship,innovation
AuthorAffiliationandContactInformation
RobertKrol
SeniorAffiliatedScholar
MercatusCenter
GeorgeMasonUniversity
Arlington,VA22201
ProfessorEmeritusofEconomics
CaliforniaStateUniversity,Northridge
Northridge,CA91330-8374
?2021byRobertKrolandtheMercatusCenteratGeorgeMasonUniversity.
Thispapercanbeaccessedat
/publications/immigration/what-do-we-know
-about-impact-im.
TheEffectsofImmigrationonEntrepreneurshipandInnovation
RobertKrol
Economicgrowthinadvancedeconomiesisdrivenprimarilybyinnovationsthatimprove
productivity.1Entrepreneursandresearchers,whoaremotivatedbyeconomicincentives,
generatenewideasthatresultineitherneworexpandedbusinesses.Theresulting
expansionofbusinessesgeneratesnewandbetterproductsandservices.Entrepreneursalso
changethewayproductionisorganizedbecausetheyimproveefficiencythatlowersprices
forconsumers.Suchactionsproduceeconomicgrowth,whichmanifestsitselfbyincreasing
productvariety,jobs,andwages.Asaresult,economicwell-beingincreases.2
Immigrantentrepreneursplayaroleintheeconomicgrowthprocess.Higherlevelsof
immigrationwerefoundtoincreaseeconomicgrowththroughanimmigrant’sproductive
skillsandinnovation-relatedactivities.3Immigrantsarealsocapturingalargerpercentage
PaulM.Romer,“EndogenousTechnologicalChange,”JournalofPoliticalEconomy98,no.2(1990):S71–S102;CharlesI.Jones,“R&D–BasedModelsofEconomicGrowth,”JournalofPoliticalEconomy103,no.4(1995):759–84;UfukAkcigitandWilliamKerr,“GrowththroughHeterogeneousInnovations,”JournalofPoliticalEconomy126,no.4(2018):1374–443.Advancedeconomieshavehighlevelsofphysicalandhumancapital,whichresultsinhigherstandardsofliving,andthoseeconomiescanalsopromoteeconomicgrowth.Beingmostlymarket-orientedeconomies,theytendtooperateatarelativelyhighlevelofefficiency.CharlesI.Jones,“TheFactsofEconomicGrowth,”inHandbookofMacroeconomics,ed.JohnTaylorandMichaelWoodford(Amsterdam:ElsevierB.V.,2016).
DeirdreN.McCloskey,BourgeoisEquality:HowIdeas,NotCapitalorInstitutions,EnrichedtheWorld
(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,2016)alsostressestheimportantrolethatideasplayineconomicprosperityfromaneconomichistoryperspective.
FrancescOrtegaandGiovanniPeri,“OpennessandIncome:TheRolesofTradeandImmigration,”JournalofInternationalEconomics92,no.2(2014):231–51.
3
ofpatentsintheUnitedStates.4Inaddition,immigrantscontributetonewbusinesses,and
theytendtobemoreentrepreneurialthantheaverageUScitizen.5
Immigrationiscontroversialbecausepeoplehavedifferingviewsabouttheeffectsthat
immigrantshaveontheeconomyandculture.6SomeUScitizensareconcernedthatthe
increaseinimmigrationmaychangethecountry’snationalidentity.Othersview
immigrantsasbeingsimilartothemselves.Immigrantsarepeopletryingtoimprovetheir
lifeandeconomiccircumstances.Politicalrhetoricintensifiessuchdifferences,thereby
makingimmigrationreformlesslikely.
Alookatpollingdataprovidesasenseofthedivergentviewsthatindividualshaveon
immigration.PollingdataintheUnitedStatessuggestthatpeoplearegenerallydivided
overtheeffectsofimmigrantsonthecountry.
A2020CBSNewspollasked,“Generally,doyouthinkimmigrantscomingtothe
UnitedStatesmakeAmericansocietybetterinthelongrun,makeAmericansocietyworse
inthelongrun,oryoudon’tthinkimmigrantscomingtotheU.S.havemuchofaneffect
onAmericansocietyonewayortheother?”Amongrespondents,55percentsaidbetter,16
percentsaidworse,and20percentsaiditdidnothavemucheffect.7
WilliamR.Kerr,TheGiftofGlobalTalent:HowMigrationShapesBusiness,Economy&Society(StanfordBusinessBooks,Stanford,CA,2019).
Kerr,TheGiftofGlobalTalent.
Thispaperfocusesontheeconomicratherthantheculturaleffectsofimmigration.Althoughitisunlikelythatcultureandtheeconomyareunrelated,thereisevidencethatculturaldiversity,whenmeasuredbythediversityofacountry’simmigrants,raisesnativewagesandtherentalvalueofhomes.GianmarcoI.P.
OttavianoandGiovanniPeri,“TheEconomicValueofCulturalDiversity:EvidencefromU.S.Cities,”
JournalofEconomicGeography6,no.1(2006):9–44.
CBSNewspolltakenfromPollingR,.
4
A2020Galluppollaskedthequestion,“Inyourview,shouldimmigrationbekeptat
itspresentlevel,increased,ordecreased?”Amongrespondents,36percentwantedtokeepit
atthepresentlevel,34percentthoughtitshouldincrease,and28percentwantedit
decreased.Whereasresponseshavefluctuatedovertime,thepercentageofpeoplewho
thinkthelevelofimmigrationshouldbeincreasedequaledonly7percentintheearliestpoll
takenin1965.Respondentswhothoughtitshouldbekeptatthesamelevelordecreased
declinedoverthesameperiodsuggesting,atleastuntilrecently,thatimmigrationappeared
tobeviewedmorefavorably.8
ThosepollssuggestthatpeopleintheUnitedStatesaredividedaboutthecostsand
benefitsofimmigration.UScitizensshouldkeepinmindthatimmigrants,especiallyhigh-
skilledones,startnewbusinessesandplayanimportantroleintechnologicalinnovation—
bothofwhichhelpcreatejobsandraisewagesforeveryone.Immigrantshelpprovide
importantservicessuchasinhealthcare.9Thenetbenefitsofimmigrationpromote
economicgrowthandwell-being,thusexpandingopportunitiesforbothimmigrantsand
native-bornpopulationsintheUnitedStates.
Tobetterunderstandtheeffectsofimmigrationontheeconomy,thispaperwill
providebasicdataaboutimmigrationtrendsintheUnitedStates.Themainbodyofthe
paperwillreviewtheevidencefromstudiesthatexaminetheeffectsofimmigrationon
entrepreneurshipandinnovation.
Gallup,“Immigration,”/poll/1660/immigration.aspx.
ForadiscussionoftheroleofimmigrantsindevelopingCOVIDvaccines,seeScottLincicome,“TheCOVIDVaccinesAreaTriumphofGlobalization,”commentary,December8,2020,CatoInstitute,/publications/commentary/covid-vaccines-are-triumph-globalization.
5
ImmigrantsintheUnitedStates
ImmigrantsarepeoplelivingintheUnitedStateswhowerenotUScitizensatbirth.10Table
1providesdataaboutthetotalnumberofimmigrants(measuredinthousands).Italso
expressesthenumberasapercentageofUSpopulationbetween1960and2019.Both
measureshaveincreasedsignificantlyovertheperiod.
Table1.TotalImmigrants(inthousands)
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2019
Numberofimmigrants
9,738
9,619
14,080
19,767
31,108
39,956
39,463
PercentageofUSpopulation
5.4
4.7
6.2
7.9
11.1
12.9
13.7
Note:Thenumberofimmigrantsismeasuredinthousands.
Source:MigrationPolicyInstituteDataHub,/programs/data-hub/us-
immigration-trends#history.
Table2providesabreakdownofimmigrationdatabycountryoforigin.Foreach
country,ifitwasinthetop10(byamount)fortheyearsbetween1960and2019,thetable
liststhepercentageoftotalimmigrantsfromthatcountryinthatyear.Fortheyearsin
whichthecountrywasnotinthetop10,nodataarereported.Morethan10countriesare
listedbecauseovertime,countriesinthetop10inearlyyearsdropoutandnewcountries
enterthetop10.Twotrendsareapparent.First,Europeancountriesmakeupalarger
portionofsourcecountriesintheearlieryearsbutnotinlateryears.Second,theshareof
totalimmigrantsfromAsia,CentralAmerica,andSouthAmericahasincreasedovertime.
Unsurprisingly,Mexicocapturesthelargestsharebyfarin1980andbeyond.
ThisdefinitionincludesnaturalizedUScitizens,green-cardholders,refugees,asylees,temporary-visaholders,andunauthorizedpersons.
6
Table2.CountryofOrigin—DataAvailablefortheTop10EachColumn
Country
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2019
Austria
3.1
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
Canada
9.8
8.4
6.0
3.8
2.6
—
—
China
—
—
—
2.7
3.2
4.0
5.3
Cuba
—
4.6
4.3
3.7
2.8
2.8
3.1
DominicanRepublic
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
2.5
ElSalvador
—
—
—
—
2.7
3.0
3.1
Germany
10.2
8.7
6.0
3.6
2.3
—
—
Guatemala
—
—
—
—
—
2.1
2.2
Hungary
2.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
India
—
—
—
—
3.3
4.5
6.1
Ireland
3.5
2.6
—
—
—
—
—
Italy
12.9
10.5
5.9
2.9
—
—
—
RepublicofKorea
—
—
2.1
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.4
Mexico
5.9
7.9
15.6
21.7
29.5
29.3
25.0
Philippines
—
—
3.6
4.6
4.4
4.4
4.7
Poland
7.7
5.7
3.0
—
—
—
—
SovietUnion/Russia
7.1
4.8
2.9
—
—
—
—
UnitedKingdom
8.6
7.1
4.8
3.2
—
—
—
Vietnam
—
—
—
2.7
3.2
3.1
3.2
Other
28.8
37.5
45.9
48.1
43.3
41.8
42.4
Notes:
Eachnumberisacountry’spercentageoftheimmigrantpopulationintheUnitedStatesinaparticularyear.Thecountriesarelistedinalphabeticalorder.Morethan10countriesarelistedbecause,overtime,somecountriesfalloutandsomeareaddedtothetop10inaparticularyearbecauseofdifferentimmigrantflows.
—=notapplicable.
Source:MigrationPolicyInstituteDataHub,
USImmigrationTrends,|
.
Table3providestheeducationalattainmentlevelforimmigrantsfrom10countries
withthelargestshareofimmigrationin2019.PanelAlooksatallimmigrants,whereas
panelBlooksatthesamegroupofcountriesbutforalltheimmigrantswhocametothe
UnitedStatesafter2013.TheskilldistributionofimmigrantstendstohaveaUshape.Skill
levelsconcentrateatthehighandlowendsofthedistribution.Wecanseethis
concentrationintable3.Icalculatethat,forallimmigrantsbetween1960and2019,26.3
percenthadfewerthan12yearsofeducation,whereas32.7percenthadabachelor’sdegree
ormore(panelA).Forcomparison,in2019,36.3percentofnative-bornUScitizenshada
7
bachelor’sdegreeormore,and6.7percenthadnotgraduatedfromhighschool.Those
percentageschangeforthemorerecentimmigrants:18.6percenthavefewerthan12years
ofeducationwhereas47.9percenthaveabachelor’sdegreeormore(panelb).Theskillmix
ofimmigrantsasmeasuredbyeducationlevelhaschanged,withfewerunskilledworkers
andmoreskilledworkers.
Table3.ImmigrantEducationalAttainment2019
Country
Lessthan9th
9th–12thgrade
Highschool
Somecollegeor
Bachelor’sdegree
grade(%)
(%)
diploma(%)
associatedegree(%)
orhigher(%)
PanelA
China
12.5
7.5
16.5
12.3
51.2
Cuba
11.6
12.1
31.0
20.8
24.4
Dominican
18.8
12.5
30.0
22.6
16.1
Republic
ElSalvador
33.1
16.6
26.6
15.0
8.7
Guatemala
43.2
12.9
22.5
14.1
7.4
India
3.1
3.5
6.8
7.1
79.5
Korea
4.5
3.4
17.7
18.8
55.6
Mexico
34.6
18.0
26.0
13.6
7.8
Philippines
4.1
3.1
15.2
27.2
50.4
Vietnam
17.2
11.1
23.0
21.5
27.2
NativeBorn
1.5
5.2
28.7
28.2
36.3
PanelB
China
8.3
4.7
15.1
10.7
61.2
Cuba
5.8
10.8
37.4
14.5
31.5
Dominican
16.0
11.7
32.8
20.5
18.9
Republic
ElSalvador
33.2
16.0
25.8
13.7
11.3
Guatemala
49.9
10.9
21.8
10.5
6.9
India
3.0
2.7
5.0
3.6
85.7
Korea
3.2
0.8
6.7
12.4
76.9
Mexico
27.7
17.8
25.2
10.6
18.7
Philippines
3.7
2.5
17.6
23.3
52.8
Vietnam
16.4
12.3
32.1
15.0
24.3
Note:Thecountriesarelistedinalphabeticalorder.Eachentrymeasurestheeducationalattainmentasapercentageofthatcountry’simmigrantsintheUnitedStates.PanelAisforalladults(ages25andolder)residingintheUnitedStates.PanelBisforadults(ages25andolder)whoarrivedintheUnitedStatesinthepastfiveyears.
Sources:MigrationPolicyInstituteDataHub,
USImmigrationTrends
;native-borndatafromtheUSCensusBureau,/content/census/en/data/tables/2019/demo/educational-attainment/cps-detailed-tables.html.
8
Morethan85percentofrecentimmigrantsfromIndiahaveabachelor’sdegreeor
more.OthercountriesthatprovidealargepercentageofskilledlaborincludeChinaandthe
Philippines.Moreover,Guatemala,Mexico,Vietnam,andtheDominicanRepublicprovide
thelargestsharesofunskilledlabor.
Thenumberofimmigrantshasincreasedbothinabsolutenumbersandasashareof
theUSpopulation.Moreover,thecountriesoforiginhaveshiftedfromEuropetoLatin
AmericaandAsia.Theshareofhigher-skilledimmigrantshasrisen,whiletheshareof
lower-skilledimmigrantshasdeclined.
ImmigrationandEntrepreneurship
DataindicatethegrowthinentrepreneurshipintheUnitedStatesisslowing.Deckeretal.
reportthatinrecentdecadesthetrendhasbeendownwardinthegrowthofbusiness
startupsintheUnitedStates.11Thedeclinehasacceleratedsince2000.Onewaytooffset
thisgrowthtrendistoexpandimmigration,especiallyamonghigher-skilledentrepreneurial
immigrants.12
Deckeretal.foundthatbetween1980and2010grossjobcreationaveraged
approximately18percentoftheworkforce,orabout2.9millionjobsannually.Netjob
RyanDecker,JohnHaltiwanger,RonJarmin,andJavierMiranda,“TheRoleofEntrepreneurshipinUSJobCreationandEconomicDynamism,”JournalofEconomicPerspectives28,no.3(2014):3–24;CongressionalBudgetOffice,FederalResponsestoDecliningEntrepreneurship,December29,2020.
SariPekkalaKerrandWilliamKerr,“ImmigrantEntrepreneurshipinAmerica:EvidencefromtheSurveyofBusinessOwners,2007&2012,”ResearchPolicy49,no.3(2020):1–18;Kerr,TheGiftofGlobalTalent.
9
creationforstartupfirmswasalso2.9millionperyear.13Theyalsofoundthatstartupsize
hasnotincreased.
Fairlie,Miranda,andZolasfoundthattheaveragenumberofstartupsbetween1995
and2010was5.4millionperyear.14Thisnumberrepresentsabout25percentofthetotal
businessesintheUnitedStates.Suchstartupscreateabout3millionjobsintheirstartup
yearandemploy2.9millionworkersfiveyearslater.Thisfigureiscomparablewiththose
reportedinDeckeretal.Theemploymentgrowthofthesurvivingfirmsmorethanoffsets
thejoblosesoffirmsthatexit.Infact,withouttheadditionaljobs,aggregateemployment
growthintheUnitedStateswouldhavebeennegativeduringthisperiod.
ImmigrantstendtobemoreentrepreneurialthandoestheaverageUScitizen.15They
apparentlyaremoremobileandappeartobewillingtotakeonmorerisk.Thedifference
canbeexplainedpartlybythefactthatanindividual’sdecisiontoemigrateisrisky,much
likestartinganewbusiness.Immigrants,bytheirnature,appeartobemoretolerantofrisk.
Immigrantsmayalsobemorelikelytostarttheirownbusinessbecausetheyinitially
mayfacediscriminationinthelabormarket.16Thegrowingpercentageofimmigrantswith
Deckeretal.,“TheRoleofEntrepreneurship.”O(jiān)nereasonisthatastartupfirmhasnotlostanyjobsinthepast,sogrossandnetjobcreationwillbethesame.Becausetheentireprivatesector’snetjobcreationis1.4millionperyear,olderfirmsmusthaveexperiencednegativenetjobcreation.
RobertW.Fairlie,JavierMiranda,andNikolasZolas,“JobCreationandSurvivalamongEntrepreneurs:EvidencefromtheUniverseofU.S.Startups”(WorkingPaper,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz,2018);RobertW.Fairlie,JavierMiranda,andNikolasZolas,“MeasuringJobCreation,Growth,andSurvivalamongtheUniverseofStart-upsintheUnitedStatesUsingaCombinedStart-upPanelDataSet,”IndustrialandLaborRelationsReview72,no.5(2019):1262–77.
KerrandKerr,“ImmigrantEntrepreneurshipinAmerica.”
JenniferHuntandMarjolaineGauthier-Loiselle,“HowMuchDoesImmigrationBoostInnovation?”
AmericanEconomicJournal:Macroeconomics2,no.2(2010):31–56;JenniferHunt,“WhichImmigrantsAre
MostInnovativeandEntrepreneurial?”JournalofLaborEconomics29,no.3(2011):417–57.
10
collegedegreesinSTEMfieldsmaymakethemmoreinclinedtodevelopnewproductsand
tostartbusinessesthanistheaverageUScitizen.17
Tworecentpapersprovideevidenceaboutthisissue.Azoulayetal.usedatafromthe
USCensustoexaminebusinessstartupsfortheperiod2005to2010.18Theyfoundthatthe
firmcountpercapitaforimmigrantsishigherthanfornativesatallfirmsizes.Usingthe
CensusBureau’sSurveyofBusinessOwnersfor2012,theauthorsfoundthat7.25percent
ofimmigrantsstartfirmscomparedwith4.03percentofnatives,nearly80percenthigher.
Wagesatimmigrantfirmsare0.7percenthigherthanatfirmscreatedbynatives.Those
immigrant-foundedfirmsarealso35percentmorelikelytohaveapatent.Lookingat
Fortune500businesses,immigrantshavestartedmoresuccessfulbusinessesthanhave
natives.
KerrandKerrusedtheCensusBureau’sSurveyofBusinessOwnersandits
LongitudinalBusinessDatabasefortheperiod2008to2012toexamineimmigrant
entrepreneurship.19Theyfoundthatfirst-andsecond-generationimmigrantscreated
approximately40percentoftheFortune500companies.Theyalsofoundthatfirst-
generationimmigrantscreated25percentofallnewfirmsintheUnitedStatesoverthe
Kerr,TheGiftofGlobalTalent;KerrandKerr,“ImmigrantEntrepreneurshipinAmerica”;J.DavidBrown,JohnS.Earle,MeeJungKim,andKyungMinLee,“ImmigrantEntrepreneursandInnovationintheU.S.High-TechSector”(NBERWorkingPaper25565,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch,Cambridge,MA,2019);PierreAzoulay,BenjaminF.Jones,J.DanielKim,andJavierMiranda,“ImmigrationandEntrepreneurshipintheUnitedStates”(NBERWorkingPaper27778,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch,Cambridge,MA,2020).
Azoulay,Jones,Kim,andMiranda,“ImmigrationandEntrepreneurshipintheUnitedStates.”
KerrandKerr,“ImmigrantEntrepreneurshipinAmerica.”
11
periodexamined.20TheKerrandKerrsampleincludestheGreatRecessionof2008.There
isevidencethatstartupsincreaseduringrecessionsasunemployedworkerswithlimitedjob
prospectsaremorelikelytotrystartingabusinessasanalternativecareeroptionunder
thoseconditions.21
Startupbusinesssurvivalratestendtobepro-cyclical,whichmeanssurvivalratestend
todeclineduringrecessionsandriseduringexpansions.AccordingtotheKauffman
Foundation,since2012,survivalratesforallstartupshavebeenstable,fluctuatingbetween
79.2and79.7percent.Thesurvivalrateduring2009,duringtheGreatRecession,equaled
75.3percent.22
EconomistWilliamKerruseddatafromtheUSCensusBureau’sLongitudinal
Employer-HouseholdDynamicsdatabasetotrackimmigrantentrepreneurshipbetween
1995and2008.23Thedatatrackedthreedifferenttrends,andfigure1illustratesthe
findings.First,thenewfirmshareofallemployeeswhoareimmigrantsincreasedfrom16.7
percentin1995to25.6percentin2008.Second,theshareofentrepreneurswhoare
immigrantshasrisenfrom20.6percentto27.1percentovertheperiod.Finally,theshareof
newfirmswithatleastoneimmigrantentrepreneurhasgrownfrom31.1percentin1995to
37.0percentin2008.Thesedatashowthatimmigrantsareplayingagrowing
ThisfigureissignificantlydifferentfromwhatAzoulay,Jones,Kim,andMirandafound(7.25percent)becauseAzoulayetal.’sfigureisthestartuprateamongthepopulationofimmigrants,whereastheKerrandKerr(25percent)isthefigureshareoffirmsbyimmigrants.
RobertW.Fairlie,“Entrepreneurship,EconomicConditions,andtheGreatRecession,”JournalofEconomics&ManagementStrategy22,no.2(2013):207–31.
RobertW.FairlieandSameekshaDesai,“2019Early-StageEntrepreneurshipintheUnitedStates,”nationalandstatereport,June2020,EwingMarionKauffmanFoundation,KansasCity,KS.Theydonotprovidesurvivalratesforimmigrantstartups.
Kerr,TheGiftofGlobalTalent.
12
entrepreneurialroleintheUSeconomybystartingnewbusinesses.Theyalsocapturea
largershareofemploymentinnewfirms.
Figure1.ImmigrantEntrepreneurshipintheUnitedStates,1995–2008
ImmigrantpercentageofnewUSfirms
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
Shareofnewfirmswithatleastoneimmigrantentrepreneur
Shareofentrepreneurswhoareimmigrants
Shareofallemployeesinnew
firmswhoareimmigrants
15%
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Source:UsedwithpermissionfromWilliamKerr,TheGiftofGlobalTalent:HowMigrationShapesBusiness,Economy&Society,2019.
WilliamKerr’s27.1percentfigurecoveringimmigrantstartupsshowsthatinarough
approximationimmigrantsaccountforabout785,900netjobsperyear.24
EconomistsSariPekkalaKerrandWilliamKerralsoprovideamoredetailed
breakdownofimmigrantentrepreneursbysectorandstates.25Theycomparedthe
Thispercentageiscalculatedbymultiplyingtheshareofimmigrantsthatcreatestartupsbythe2.9millionnetjobscreatedannuallyasestimatedbyDeckeretal.,“TheRoleofEntrepreneurship.”
KerrandKerr,“ImmigrantEntrepreneurshipinAmerica.”
13
percentageoffirmsstartedbyimmigrants—eitheraloneorworkingwithnatives—inboth
thehigh-andlow-techsectors.In2007,thatgroupofentrepreneursstarted24.8percent
and23.6percentofhigh-andlow-techfirms,respectively.Thosefiguresriseto28.6percent
and25.5percent,respectively,in2012.
KerrandKerralsofoundthattheindustrycompositionofimmigrantandnative
businessesiscomparablewithstrictlynative-ownedfirms.Althoughindustrysharesarenot
identical,immigrantandnativefirmsdonotappeartobedisproportionallyrepresentedin
highlycyclicalindustries.Forexample,in2012,theshareofnativefirmsinconstruction
equaled13.4percent,nearlydoublethe7.0percentfigureforimmigrantandmixed
businesses.
InsomestatessuchasCaliforniaandNewYork,first-andsecond-generation
immigrantscreatedmorethan40percentofthenewbusinessesovertheperiodof2008to
2012.Butthereisawiderangeatthestatelevel.Forexample,first-andsecond-generation
immigrantsstartedonly5percentofthenewbusinessesinIdahoandNorthDakota.Such
differencesreflectdifferencesinthesizeofimmigrantpopulationsinthosestates.
Immigrantbusinessespaycomparablewagesbutprovidefewerbenefits,suchas401K
plans.Furthermore,immigrantfirmsaremoreengagedininternationaltradethanare
nativestartups.Thisengagementreflectsabetterunderstandingofforeignmarkets,
especiallyinthecountriestheyemigratedfrom.
Readerscanconcludethatimmigrantstendtobeentrepreneurialandtostarta
significantshareofUSbusinesses.Thosenewfirmsalsomakeasignificantcontributionto
employmentgrowthintheUnitedStates.
14
ImmigrationandInnovation
Agrowingbodyofresearchconfirmsthatimmigrantsplayanimportantroleininnovation
andimprovedbusinessefficiencyintheUnitedStatesandabroad.Forexample,two
articlesbyHunt—oneco-authoredwithGauthier-Loiselle—showedthatimmigrant
graduateswithscienceandengineeringdegreeshadapatentratedoubletheaveragenative
ratefortheperiodof1940to2000.26WhenimmigrantUSpatentshareiscomparedwith
nativesofsimilareducations,thedifferenceissmaller.Theauthorspointedoutthat
immigrants’shareofUSpatentshasincreasedsignificantlyoverthepast20years.Using
state-levelUSdata,HuntandGauthier-Loiselleestimatedthata1percentincreasein
immigrantcollegegraduatesasashareofthepopulationincreasesthenumberofpatents
percapitaby9to18percent.27
However,theagingpopulationintheUnitedStateswillleadtoadeclineinbusiness
startupsandinnovationovertime.28Expandingimmigrationcanmoderatethoseforcesto
helpstabilizelong-termeconomicgrowth.So,inadditiontostartingbusinesses,manyof
thosebusinessesarehighlyinnovative.Immigrantsbringnewideasaboutpotentialnew
productsandbetterwaystoproduceexistingproductsorservices.
HuntandGauthier-Loiselle,“HowMuchDoesImmigrationBoostInnovation?”;Hunt,“WhichImmigrantsAreMostInnovativeandEntrepreneurial?”.
HuntandGauthier-Loiselle,“HowMuchDoesImmigrationBoostInnovation?”
JamesLiang,HuiWang,andEdwardP.Lazear,“DemographicsandEntrepreneurship,”JournalofPoliticalEconomy126,no.51(2018):S140–S196;CharlesJones,“TheEndofEconomicGrowth?UnintendedConsequencesofaDecliningPopulation”(NBERWorkingPaper26651,NationalBureauofEconomicResearch,Cambridge,MA,2020);NicholasBloom,CharlesI.Jones,JohnVanReenen,andMichaelWebb,“AreIdeasGettingHardertoFind?”AmericanEconomicReview110,no.4(2020):1104–44.
15
WilliamKerrusesacomputerprogramthatdeterminestheethnicityofapatentholder
byusingtheperson’sfirstandlastname.29DrawingondatafromtheUSPatentand
TrademarkOffice,hewasabletodeterminethe
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 江蘇省海門市2025年高三模擬試題數(shù)學試題試卷解析
- 2019-2025年二級注冊建筑師之建筑結(jié)構(gòu)與設(shè)備通關(guān)提分題庫(考點梳理)
- 2025深圳市設(shè)備供應合同范本
- 2025租房合同協(xié)議書樣本參考
- 餐飲外出營銷方案范本
- 光伏 項目 合同樣本
- 2025光纖買賣合同范本
- 2025中外合作開發(fā)合同(電子產(chǎn)品)
- 商場鋼網(wǎng)架施工方案
- 提升團隊協(xié)作效率的措施計劃
- 市政道路施工方案投標文件(技術(shù)方案)
- 山東《電動自行車集中充電設(shè)施建設(shè)規(guī)范》
- 廣東省佛山市S6高質(zhì)量發(fā)展聯(lián)盟2023-2024學年高一下學期4月期中考試數(shù)學
- 杭州本級公共租賃住房資格續(xù)審申請表Ⅴ
- (完整版)英語四級詞匯表
- 新浙美版小學美術(shù)二年級下冊教學計劃教案及教學反思
- 2024年消防宣傳月知識競賽考試題庫300題(含答案)
- 道路旅客運輸企業(yè)雙重預防機制建設(shè)指導手冊
- 歷史的三峽:近代中國思潮與政治學習通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
- 掛靠租車合同范本
- 2024年中國壁球館市場調(diào)查研究報告
評論
0/150
提交評論