2012高考英語(yǔ):閱讀理解課堂練學(xué)案(24)_第1頁(yè)
2012高考英語(yǔ):閱讀理解課堂練學(xué)案(24)_第2頁(yè)
2012高考英語(yǔ):閱讀理解課堂練學(xué)案(24)_第3頁(yè)
2012高考英語(yǔ):閱讀理解課堂練學(xué)案(24)_第4頁(yè)
2012高考英語(yǔ):閱讀理解課堂練學(xué)案(24)_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩2頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、2012高考英語(yǔ):閱讀理解課堂練學(xué)案(24) Passage Twenty-six (Sensory Evaluation of Food)   A Polish proverb claims that fish, to taste right, should three timesin water, in butter and in wine. The early efforts of the basic scientists in the food industry were directed at improving the preparation, preserva

2、tion, and distribution of safe and nutritious food. Our memories of certain foodstuffs eaten during the World War II suggest that, although these might have been safe and nutritious, they certainly did not taste right nor were they particularly appetizing in appearance or smell. This neglect of the

3、sensory appeal of foods is happily becoming a thing of the past. Bow, in the book “Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food,” the authors hope that it will be useful to food technologists in industry and also to others engaged in research into problem of sensory evaluation of foods. An attempt has c

4、learly been make to collect every possible piece of information, which might be useful, more than one thousand five hundred references being quoted. As a result, the book seems at first sight to be an exhaustive and critically useful review of the literature. This it certainly is, but this is by no

5、means is its only achievement, for there are many suggestions for further lines of research, and the discursive passages are crisply provocative of new ideas and new ways of looking at established findings.   Of particular interest is the weight given to the psychological aspects of percep

6、tion, both objectively and subjectively. The relation between stimuli and perception is well covered, and includes a valuable discussion of the uses and disadvantages of the Weber fraction of differences. It is interesting to find that in spite of many attempts to separate and define the modalities

7、of taste, nothing better has been achieved than the familiar classification into sweet, sour salty and bitter. Nor is there as yet any clear-cut evidence of the physiological nature of the taste stimulus. With regard to smell, systems of classification are of little value because of the extraordinar

8、y sensitivity of the nose and because the response to the stimulus is so subjective. The authors suggest that a classification based on the size, shape and electronic status of the molecule involved merits further investigation, as does the theoretical proposition that weak physical binding of the s

9、timulant molecule to he receptor site is a necessary part of the mechanism of stimulation.2 / 7   Apart from taste and smell, there are many other components of perception of the sensations from food in the mouth. The basic modalities of pain, cold, warmth and touch, together with vibratio

10、n sense, discrimination and localization may all play a part, as, of course, does auditory reception of bone-conducted vibratory stimuli from the teeth when eating crisp or crunchy foods. In this connection the authors rightly point out that this type of stimulus requires much more investigation, su

11、ggesting that a start might be made by using subjects afflicted with various forms of deafness. It is well-known that extraneous noise may alter discrimination, and the attention of the authors is directed to the work of Prof. H. J. Eysenck on the “stimulus hunger” of extroverts and the “stimulus av

12、oidance” of introverts.1.      The reviewer uses a Polish proverb at the beginning of the article in order to A. introduce, in an interesting manner, the discussion of food. show the connection between food and nationality of food.C. indicate that there are various ways to prepare foo

13、d.D. impress upon the reader the food value of fish.2.      The reviewers appraisal of “Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food” is one of A. mixed feelings.               . indifferenceC. high praise.         

14、0;        D. faint praise.3.      The writer of the article does not express the view, either directly or by implication, thatA. sharply defined classifications of taste are needed. more research should be done regarding the molecular constituency of food.C. f

15、ood values are objectively determined by an expert “smeller”.D. temperature is an important factor in the value of food.4.      The authors of the book suggest the use of deaf subject becauseA. deaf people are generally introversive. . the auditory sense is an important factor in food

16、 evaluation.C. they are more fastidious in their choice of foods.D. All types of subjects should be used.Vocabulary1.      preservation                      保鮮,保存2.      sensory appeal    &#

17、160;               感官的魅力3.      be provocative of                  脫穎而出4.      exhaustive                   &#

18、160;   詳盡的,無(wú)遺漏的5.      discursive                        推論的6.      be provocative of                  引起爭(zhēng)論/興趣等的7.      

19、crisp                            有力的,有勁的8.      perception                       感覺(jué),知覺(jué),直覺(jué)9.      modality 

20、0;                       方式          modality of taste      (味)感覺(jué)到10.      discrimination                  

21、60;  鑒別力11.      localization                       地區(qū)性,定位12.      merit                            值得,有價(jià)

22、值13.      crunchy                          嘎吱作響的14.      extraneous                        外部的15.     

23、60;extrovert                         外向性格的人16.      introvert                         內(nèi)項(xiàng)性格的人難句譯注1.      althou

24、gh these might have been safe and nutritious, they certainly did not taste right nor were they particularly appetizing in appearance or smell.結(jié)構(gòu)簡(jiǎn)析 in appearance or smell 應(yīng)譯成:色或香。參考譯文 雖然這些飯菜可能是安全又有營(yíng)養(yǎng),但是肯定味不正,特別是在色,香上難以增進(jìn)食欲。2.      This it certainly is, but this is by no means is its on

25、ly achievement, for there are many suggestions for further lines of research, and the discursive passages are crisply provocative of new ideas and new ways of looking at established findings.結(jié)構(gòu)簡(jiǎn)析 復(fù)合句。This 指前一句內(nèi)容:書既詳細(xì)又是對(duì)有關(guān)食品學(xué)的文字做了十分有用的評(píng)論。 Be provocative of 引起爭(zhēng)論或興趣。參考譯文 確實(shí)如此,可是這并不是書的唯一成就,因?yàn)闀鴥?nèi)有許多關(guān)于進(jìn)一步研

26、究范圍的建議。推論性篇章及能令人非常感興趣的看待現(xiàn)存成果的新觀點(diǎn)和新方法。3.      The relation between stimuli and perception is well covered, and includes a valuable discussion of the uses and disadvantages of the Weber fraction of differences.Weber fraction 為Ernest Heinrich Weber所著,他生于1795年,死與1878,是德國(guó)生理學(xué)家。參考譯文 書中詳細(xì)論及刺激

27、和感覺(jué)的關(guān)系。還包括了一篇很有價(jià)值的討論文章:談?wù)撏謹(jǐn)?shù)在評(píng)價(jià)差異上的缺點(diǎn)和實(shí)用性。寫作方法和文章大意   這是一篇介紹“感官評(píng)價(jià)食品的原理“一書的序言。評(píng)者從書的讀者對(duì)象,書的篇幅到內(nèi)涵具體涉及片談起,從主觀到客觀論證,采用例子和對(duì)比說(shuō)明。第一段全面介紹,點(diǎn)出此書不同于過(guò)去的書。它們都把重點(diǎn)放在改善準(zhǔn)備,保養(yǎng)和銷售上。此書信息多,引證參考資料多,對(duì)今后研究有新建議; 對(duì)已有成果有新關(guān)點(diǎn)。第二段,從客觀到主觀的論述味覺(jué),嗅覺(jué)并加以對(duì)比。第三段從眾多其它感覺(jué)中,以聽(tīng)覺(jué)為重點(diǎn)論證。答案祥解1.      A. 以有趣的方式開(kāi)始介紹食品討論。文章一開(kāi)始,評(píng)者就用“波蘭有一諺語(yǔ)說(shuō),魚,要想品味正,應(yīng)游泳三次在水里游,在油里游和在酒中游?!边@是國(guó)外廣告式論說(shuō)文經(jīng)常才用的一種寫作方式。目的是吸引讀者,激起他們想讀下去的欲望,以達(dá)到推廣作用。B. 表明食品和國(guó)籍的關(guān)系。      C. 表明有各種準(zhǔn)備食品的方法

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論