復旦大學曹晉教授傳播學書目分享

1、Course Goal：培養(yǎng)新聞傳播研究生的學術研究能力與反思意識。本課程除講授與討論外， 十分重視案例的應用與分析.試圖發(fā)展傳播批判典范的分析模式與案例，使 理論觀點能應用于詮釋經(jīng)驗世界，而經(jīng)驗世界的概括與論述也能作為豐富理 論或修正理論的源泉。深入理解重要的理論流派脈絡及其產(chǎn)生的語境。觀察、分析、批評本土新聞傳播產(chǎn)業(yè)的現(xiàn)象、制度和產(chǎn)業(yè)變遷。倡導具有反思與批判意識的學術精神和社會關懷。Course Outline and Selected BibliographyIntroduction ( One Week )Required Readings :薩米爾.阿明著，丁開杰等譯（2005），全

2、球化時代的資本主義：對 當代社會的管理，中國人民大學出版社。羅穆爾（John E. Roemer）著，馮建三譯（2005），論市場社會主義， 臺灣聯(lián)經(jīng)出版。丹席勒（Dan Schiller）著（2008）信息拜物教：批判與解構，北 京：社科文獻出版社。Sue Curry Jansen著，曹晉主譯（2007），批判的傳播理論：權力、媒 介、社會性別和科技中的第二章，復旦大學出版社。陳學明（1996），文化工業(yè)，楊智出版（文化手邊策系列）。舒嘉興（2001），新聞卸妝一布爾迪厄新聞場域理論，臺北：桂冠。黃瑞祺（1996）,批判社會學，臺北：三民。劉駿州（1994），實證、批判、詮釋一三大方法典范之

3、初探，新聞 學研究，48:153167。美麥克爾哈特、意安東尼奧奈格里著，楊建國等譯（2003），帝 國：全球化的政治秩序，江蘇人民出版社。英）彼得迪肯著，劉衛(wèi)東等譯（2007）,全球性轉變：重塑21世紀的 全球經(jīng)濟地圖，商務印書館。Part One: Mass Communication and Information Society(FourWeeks)1950-1980: Information and Knowledge ,Post-industrial Society(Bell, 1973)Mass Communication, Power and Social Order (Jam

4、es Curran, 1982)Mass Communication and State Regulation (Giddens,1987)Mass Communication and Urban Change( Castells, 1972)Knowledge Workers in Information Society( McKercher，Catherine and Vincent Mosco, 2008)Required Readings :1 .丹尼爾貝爾著（1986）,后工業(yè)社會的來臨：對社會預測的一項探索, 商務印書館。C賴特米爾斯著，陳強 張永強譯（2005）,社會學的想象力，

5、北京： 三聯(lián)書店。安東尼吉登斯著，李猛、李康譯（1998）：社會的構成：結構化理論 大綱，北京：三聯(lián)書店。安東尼吉登斯著，胡宗澤等譯（1998）,民族一國家與暴力，北京：三 聯(lián)書店。安東尼吉登斯著，趙旭東等譯（1998），現(xiàn)代性與自我認同，北京：三 聯(lián)書店。Webster, Frank (2002): Theoriesof The InformationSociety, 3nd edition,曹晉梁靜等譯，北京大學出版社，2011中文版。曼紐爾卡斯特（Manuel Castells）著，夏鑄久等譯（2001）：網(wǎng)絡社會的 崛起，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。James Curran著（1982）

6、,唐維敏譯（1994中文版），傳播、權力和社 會秩序，收入 Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, Janet Woollacott等主編的文化、社會與媒體：批判性觀點，臺北：遠流出版 公司，第283-334頁。McKercher，Catherine and Vincent Mosco（2008）, Knowledge Workers Information Society,Lexington Books.羅真吳冬妮林曦譯，知識勞工與信 息社會，上海譯文出版社，2011。斯各特拉什著，楊德睿譯，信息批判，北京大學出版社，2009。Part

7、Two: Mass Communication and Cultural Studies（FourWeeks）Cultural Hegemony （Gramsci,1971）Encoding and Decoding, Articulation Theory （Hall ,1977-1970）FrankfurtSchooland Transformation of the Public sphere（Habermas,1989）Ideology, Knowledge and Power（Michel Foucault,1980-1984）Required Readings :（意）葛蘭西著，曹

8、雷雨等譯（2000），獄中札記，北京：中國社會 科學出版社。意）葛蘭西著，田時綱譯（2007），獄中書簡，北京：人民出版社。Stuart Hall著（1982），黃麗玲譯（1994，臺灣繁體版），“意識形 態(tài)的再發(fā)現(xiàn)：媒體研究中被壓抑者的重返，收入Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, Janet Woollacott 等主編（1982）文化、 社會與媒體：批判性觀點，臺北：遠流出版公司，第73-122頁。哈貝馬斯，曹衛(wèi)東等譯（1999），公共領域的結構轉型，上海：學林出版社。鄧正來等編（1999）,國家與市民社會：一種社會理論的研究路徑，

9、北 京：中央編譯出版社：第1-21頁。 黃宗智（1999）,中國的公共領域與市民社會？一一國家與社 會間的第三領域，國家與市民社會：一種社會理論的研究路徑，北京： 中央編譯出版社，第420-443頁。 法）米歇爾福柯著，余碧平譯（2000）,性經(jīng)驗史，上海：上海人 民出版社。 法）米歇爾?？轮?，劉北成、楊遠嬰譯（2003）,規(guī)訓與懲罰，北 京：三聯(lián)書店。路易阿爾都塞著，顧良譯（2007），保衛(wèi)馬克思，北京：商務印書館。路易阿爾都塞（Louis Althusser）:意識形態(tài)和意識形態(tài)國家機器, 李迅譯,載外國電影理論文選，李恒基、楊遠嬰主編，上海：海文藝出版 社1995年版。馬杰偉（2006）

10、，酒吧工廠：南中國城市文化研究，南京：江蘇人民 出版社。陳光興（1994），譯序：文化研究在英國的歷史變動軌跡，Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, Janet Woollacott 等主編（1982）文化、社會與媒體：批判性觀點，臺北：遠流出版公司。方孝謙（1999），什么是再現(xiàn)？跨學門觀點初探，新聞學研究，第 60 期，1999年7月，第 115-148 頁。Special Topic: Feminism and Cultural Studies一、What is feminist Cultural Studies?（一）、Defin

11、itions/CharacteristicsShort history of Cultural Studies in Britain and the U.S.Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Birmingham, EnglandCultural Studies in the U.S.Transnational Cultural Studies（二）、Methods of inquiryInterdisciplinary field of knowledge productionRadically contextualizingLived en

12、vironment: practices of daily lifeArticulationPolitically interventionistDisciplineSelf-reflexivity（三）、Feminism and Cultural Studiesa）Feminist interventions in Cultural Studiesb）Points of commonality1、Activist agenda2、Focus on lived experience: identity, difference, marginality3、Multiple axes of ide

13、ntity: intersectionality and articulation4、Recognition of positionality of the knower.5、Power: complex, multidimensional, unstable, contradictory6、Productive tensions among axes of identity and relations of power7、Interdisciplinarity as a source of necessary tension8、Necessity of alliances and coali

14、tionsArticulationis one of the most important analytical concepts used by manygmpractitioners of cultural studies when they attempt to contextualize the practices of everyday life. As a methodological stance, it is an attempt to mediate between essentialism and radical anti-essentialism. Essentialis

15、m tends to view the origin of something as already defining its possibilities; anti-essentialism sees all relationships as a contingent effect of power. In its more extreme forms, anti-essentialism can devolve into relativism. Cultural Studies negotiates the theoretical paradigms on the right and th

16、e left by attempting to avoid the extremes of universalist and relativist paradigms of understanding. As a mediation between these two positions, the concept of articulation attempts to show the contingent historical relationships, the interconnections among disparate things, that create specific ma

17、terial effects. When it is focused on the interconnections among different axes of social identity, like gender, race, class, sexuality, or disability, it is very akin to the theory of intersectionality in feminism.Required Readings :Lawrence Grossberg （1997） , “Cultural Studies: Whats in a Name? （O

18、ne More Time）,”Bringing it all back home: Essays on Cultural Studies.pp. 245-271Stuart Hall （1980）, “Race, articulation and societies structured in dominance,”Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism （Paris: UNESCO, pp. 305-345）.（美）羅伯特艾倫著，牟嶺譯（2008）,重組話語頻道：電視與當代批評理 論（第2版），北京：大學出版社Van Zoonen著，曹晉曹茂譯

19、（2007）,女性主義媒介研究，桂林：廣西師 范大學出版社。Sue Curry Jansen著，曹晉主譯（2007）,批判的傳播理論：權力、媒 介、社會性別和科技中的第5-10章，復旦大學出版社。A letterDear Jin:Great question! There are two different answers to your question: social conflict in general remains a very hot topic in academia, in the humanities, the social sciences, and schools of

20、 media and information technology. People in the U.S. are particularly interested in issues of gender and race, and this fact has infused a lot of scholarship, if not a corresponding of popular interest (as in the mainstream media).However, class stratification remains underrepresented in both schol

21、arship and mainstream discourses. Concern for class is far more evident in the British academy than in the U.S., where many people buy into the idea that all of America is middle class, and that the main social problem is one of racial inequality. This in part has to do with the failures of the poli

22、tical Left in the U.S. in the post-Vietnam war era. Since the ascendance of the New Right and Regan, we have been living in a long era of social conservatism, which has privileged the wealthy and exacerbated class differences. But there is very little recognition of that fact-even though our economy

23、 is now in dire straits. In Britain, there is a far longer history of the left, of the Labour Part, and of British Marxism as an academic field, and therefore much more class consciousness.There are, however, American sociologists like Sherry Ortner and humanists like my colleague Nadine Hubbs, who

24、are currently working on class, especially the white working class. I know from talking with Nadine that there are a few good books out there about class identity, the way that class functions in culture, but there is not anything like what is available regarding gender or race issues. Fm sure that

25、if you contacted her, explaining who you are and that you are working with me, she would be willing to share a short bibliography. Her email is HYPERLINK mailto:nhubbs nhubbs.American feminists often pay lip service to the analytical triad of gender, race, and class. However, the focus has remained

26、on gender and race, in part because many more scholars of color have gained access to the academy, whereas working class people remain disenfranchised by our academic system, which has only gotten more expensive since I went to College.See you in class!ValeriePart Three: Field Theory in Comparative

27、Context: A New Paradigmfor Media Studies(2 Weeks)Employing Pierre Bourdieu, the late French sociologists Field Theory as the theoretical framework, the author researches into the media field of France with analyzing several case studies .Required Readings :Pierre Bourdieu著，朱國華譯（2003）：區(qū)隔：趣味判斷的社會 批判引言

28、，陶東風等主編：文化研究第4輯（中央編譯出版社， 第12頁）。舒嘉興（2001），新聞卸妝一布爾迪厄新聞場域理論，臺北：桂冠。Rodney Benson著，韓綱譯（2003），比較語境中的場域理論：媒介研 究的新范式，新聞與傳播研究，2003年第1期。4（法）皮埃爾布迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu），（美）華康德（Loic Wacquant）著, 李猛，李康譯（2004），實踐與反思:反思社會學導引，北京:中央編譯 出版社。美華康德著，張美川譯，皮埃爾布迪厄的社會學生涯，載北 京大學社會學學刊，第一輯，109-115頁，北京：北京大學出版社，2004 年包亞明主編：布爾迪厄訪談錄-文化資

29、本與社會煉金術，上海人民出 版社1997年版Part Four: The Political Economy of Communication （Six Weeks）一、Historical Origins and Theoretical Foundations二、Methodological Considerations and Disciplinary Dialogues三、The Power of Advertising and the Making of the Audience Commodity四、Ownership and Control in the Anglo-America

30、n Contexts: Capital, theState, and Other Social Forces五、The Global, and National, and Local Dynamics of Capitalist Integration六、The Connections of Feminist Theory and Political EconomyThis part attempts to build connections between feminist theory and political economy, particularly as they apply to

31、 labour, and to show how the information and communication sector offers a substantive base for exploring that relationship.Required Readings :Theories of Communication and Theories of SocietyPeter Golding Graham MurdockThe Legacy of Robert A. Brady: Antifascist Origins of the Political Economy of C

32、ommunicationsDan SchillerThe Frankfurt School and the Political Economy of CommunicationsRonald V. BettigCommunications:Blindspot of Western MarxismDallas W. SmythePolitical Economy, Communication, and LaborVincent Mosco.Political Economy, Power and New MediaRobin MansellAdvertising at the Edge of t

33、he ApocalypseSut JhallyGendering the Commodity Audience: Critical Media Research, Feminism, and Political EconomyEileen R. MeehanRace,Ethnicity and the Segmentation of Media Markets Oscar H. Gandy, Jr閱讀上述9篇論文，請查閱曹晉 趙月枝主編（2007）, The Political Economy of Communication: A Reader,復旦大學出版社。Valentine Mogha

34、dam(2005),“Globalization and Its Discontents: Capitalist Development, Political Movements, and Gend er”， Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist NetworJkspp.21-49.Chandra Mohanty(2003), “Women Workers and the Politics of Solidarity”，from Feminism Without Borderspp.139-168.Recommended Readings:美赫伯特

35、席勒（中文版1994）,王怡紅譯，思想管理者，臺北：遠流出版公司。加文森特莫斯可（中文版2004）,胡正榮 等譯，傳播：在政治和經(jīng)濟的張力下，北京：華夏出版社。趙月枝（1998）, Media, Market, and Democracy in China Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.馮建三（2003b）,傳播政治經(jīng)濟學在臺灣的發(fā)展，新聞學 研究，2003, 04,總75期，第103-140頁。馮建三（1992）,資訊、錢、權：媒體文化的政經(jīng)研究，臺北：時報出版 公司。馮建三（2003a）,傳播政治經(jīng)濟學與文化研究的對話，傳

36、 播與管理研究，2003, 01,第2卷，第2期。Sue Curry Jansen著，曹晉主譯，批判的傳播理論：權力、媒介、社會 性別和科技,復旦大學出版社。曹晉趙月枝主編，傳播政治經(jīng)濟學英文讀本(The Political Economy ofCommunication: A Reade)，復旦大學出版社(上、下冊)，2007。11.曹晉(2007),文化認同與市場邏輯：加拿大圖書出版產(chǎn)業(yè)分析，北 京：中國出版，2007, 7,第55頁。10.曹晉周憲(2006),新世紀傳播研究譯叢總序，上海：復旦大學出版社。Special Topic: Alternative Media and Soci

37、al Movement (One Week)1、曹晉(2007b),“中國大陸的另類媒介生產(chǎn)：以朋友通信為例”， 香港：傳播與社會學刊，2007, 12,第75-102頁。2、馮建三(1995),異議媒體的停滯與流變之初探：從政論雜志到地下電 臺，臺灣社會研究季刊，No.20,August ,1995,pp177-233.3、Chris Atton (2002), Alternative Media, London: Sage.4、John Downing (2001) , Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements

38、, London: Sage.Part Four : How to Study the Mass Communication andContemporary Society( 2 Weeks)Qualitative and Quantitative AnalysisPsychoanalytical CriticismEthnographiesSpecial Topic: Semiology Analysis in Mass Communication Studies一、 The brief history of Semiology (Semiotics)1、Charles Saunders P

39、eirce (1839-1914),2、Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) , 19153、Umberto Eco, 19764、Roland Barthes, 1968,1973,1979圖像修辭學(Rhetoric of the image),收入圖像，音樂，文本(Image, Music, Text), 1984 (英譯本)；Mythology, 1979;流行體系 符號學與服 飾符碼，2000，上海人民。5、Stuart Hall,1980,1981,1982,1985(Encoding /Decoding)6、John Fiske ,1982(Meth

40、ods)7、John Fiske & John Hartly, 1978(TV)8、Gillan Dyer ,1982 & Sut Jhally ,1990(Advertising)9、David Morley,1986 (Audience) and so on.Jonathan Bignell, Media Semiotics, 1997，這部書對于羅蘭巴特有精彩論述， 并專辟章節(jié)探討如何將符號學應用于廣告、婦女雜志、報紙、電視新聞與電視 劇及電影。John Storey, Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture,

41、1993, Researching Communications, Deacon et al., 1999Dick Hebdige,作為圖像的對象：意大利小輪摩托車(Object as Image: The Italian Scooter Cycle)和行星一號的底線：清算面部雜志(The Bottom Line on Planet One: Squaring up to The Face)(這兩篇文章都收入 Hebdige,1988)o二、Communication Studies: Process School and Culture & Text School (John Fiske,

42、Introduction to Communication Studies, 1990; Arthur Asa Berger, MediaAnalysisTechniques, 1991)1、Process School:訊息的傳遞(Encoding & Decoding)，探討傳播效 果。定位傳播為一種行為。A: Claude Shannon & Warren Weaver , The Mathematical Theory of Communication,1949.資訊來源(Information) 傳輸器(Transmitter) 號(Signal)、噪音來源(Noise) 被接收的信 接收 目的地B: H. Lasswell, 1948C: T.Newcomb, 1953D: Gerbner, 1956E: B.Westley & M.Maclean, 1957F: R.Jakobson, 19602、Culture & Text School: Text and Meaning三、意義的生產(chǎn)與交換，訊息以及文本如何與人們互動并產(chǎn)生意義，即關注文 本的文化角色。解讀是發(fā)現(xiàn)意義的過程，且發(fā)生在讀者和文本的協(xié)調(diào)或互動之 際。誤解源于傳者和受眾的文化差異，主要研究方法是符號學。定位傳播為一 種作品。意義的元素A: Peirce:符號(Sign