回復(fù)英文論文編輯部的修改意見

1、文檔來源為 :從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持回復(fù)英文論文編輯部的修改意見ResponsetoEditorandReviewer.,Ph.D.ProfessorLaboratoryofPlantNutritionandEcologicalEnvironmentResearch,HuazhongAgriculturalUniversity,Wuhan,430070,E-mail:Jun10,2009RE:HAZMAT-D-09-00655DearEditor，Wewouldliketothanktheeditorforgivingusachancetoresubmitthepa

2、per,andalsothankthereviewersforgivingusconstructivesuggestionswhichwouldhelpusbothinEnglishandindepthtoimprovethequalityofthepaper.Herewesubmitanewversionofourmanuscriptwiththetitle”",whichhasbeenmodifiedaccordingtothereviewers'suggestions.Effortswerealsomadetocorrectthemistakesandimproveth

3、eEnglishofthemanuscript.Wemarkallthechangesinredintherevisedmanuscript.Sincerelyyours,.,Ph.D.Professorcomments.Thefollowingisapoint-to-pointresponsetothetworeviewers文檔來源為 :從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持Reviewer#1:Generalcomments:Reviewer#1:Thepaperpresentsaninterestingexperimentalinvestigationtoassessthe

4、photocatalyticdegradationofpolyethyleneplasticwithgoethiteunderUVirradiation.Theresearchworkisclearlypresentedbuttheconclusions,theintroductionandotherpartsofthepaperrelatetheresultsobtainedwithunjustifiedclaimsabouttheimpactofthework.Inaddition,thebackgroundinformationprovidedintheintroductionpartn

5、eedssignificantenrichment.Inparticular:Answer:Thankyouforthecommentsonthepaper.WehaverevisedthemanuscriptassuggestedsinceweconsiderthatsomesentencesordescriptionsintheConclusionpartarenotsoaccuratebasedontheresults.Page3,line46:recyclingisnotavailableEventhoughalargeamountofagriculturalplasticwastei

6、nburntorburiedinthefields,somequantitiesofspecificcategoriesofgoodqualityagriculturalplasticwastearerecycledinseveralcountrieswhileresearcheffortsandprojectsareinprogresstoimprovethecorrespondingpercentage.Theauthorsshouldrefertothecorrespondingrecentliterature.Answer:Yes.Youropinionsinspiredusandwe

7、revisedthemanuscriptaccordingly.Intherevisedpaper,thesentence“Recyclingisnotavailableforeconomy,”waschangedto“Inordertoreducecosts,thethicknessofapplicationagriculturefilmsinsomeregionsinChinaislessthan0.005mmresultindiffculttorecycle,Andbecausetheprocessofrecyclingisexpensiveandtime-consuming,onlya

8、smallpercentageoftheagriculturalplasticwasteiscurrentlyrecycledattheendofcultivationinChina4”(Page3line49-52).Therearedevelopmentsintheareaofbiodegradablematerialsthatindicatetheopposite.Concerningphotodegradablematerials,theyarenotconsideredtorepresentasolutionastheyhavenotbeenproventobebiodegradab

9、le.Theauthorsshouldrefertothecorrespondingrecentliterature.Answer:Thankyouforremindingustheimproperdescriptiononthestudy.Wehavetheimproperpartsrevisedaccordinglyandhopethatthisnewmanuscriptwillbeconvincing(Page3line52-55).Page4,line65:findaneco-friendlyThebesteco-friendlydisposalforagriculturalplast

10、icwasteisrecyclingandfornon-recyclablematerials,energyrecovery.Degradingmaterialsproducedfromfossilsourcesisnotaneco-friendlydisposal!Theauthorsshouldrefertothecorrespondingrecentliterature.Answer:Thankthereviewerforthecommenst.Weverecognizedthatsomeofthedescriptionsinthepreviouscopywerereallynotsoa

11、ccurateandalittlebitarbitraryduetoourpoorEnglishlevelandthestudyonrecentliterature.Afterconsultingmorereferences,wethereforerevisedpapertobemorereasonableandconvincing.Page4,line66:tocarbondioxideandwaterConversionoffossiloilbasedmaterialsintocarbondioxideandwaterismuchworsethanconvertingrenewable-b

12、asedmaterialsintocarbondioxideandwaterAnswer:Thankthereviewerforthecomments.Weverecognizedthatthisdescriptioninthepreviouscopywerenotaccurate,duetoourpoorstudyonrecentliterature.Thesentence“itisveryimportanttofindaneco-friendlydisposalofplasticwastewheretheydegradetocarbondioxideandwaterunderthesunl

13、ightirradiationwithoutproducingtoxicbyproducts.”hasbeendeleted.Page 6, line 112: volatile products文檔來源為 :從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持Definetheproducts.Answer:WehavedefinedthevolatileproductsinPage6line124-125.Page9,line185:eco-friendlydisposalTheclaimsoftheauthorsthatthistechniqueisaneco-friendlyoneare

14、notjustified.Theconclusionsandotherpartsofthepaperneedtoberewrittenandlimitthescopeofthepresentedresearchworktothetechnicalobjectiveswithoutderivingunjustifiedgeneralconclusionsandclaimsabouttheimpactofthiswork.Answer:Thankthereviewerforthecomments.Weverecognizedthatthisdescriptioninthepreviouscopyw

15、erenotaccurate.Thesentence“Thedevelopmentofthiskindofcompositepolymercanleadtoaneco-friendlydisposalofpolymerwastes.”waschangedto“Thepresentpaperintendstostudygoethiteasphotocatalytstfordegradatingplastic.Furtherattentioncouldbefocusedontheapplicationofthetechnique.”(Page9line192-194).Reviewer#3:1.

16、TitleandabstractshouldindicatethattheworkhasbeendonewithPE-Goethitecompositefilm.Answer:Yoursuggestionisgreatlyappreciated.Weagreeandthereforechangethetitleto:Solid-phasephotocatalyticdegradationofpolyethylenegoethitecompositefilmunderUV-lightirradiation.2. Pleaserevisethefirstparagraphof'Introd

17、uction'.Itisdifficulttounderstand.Ingeneral,thelanguageofthepapershouldberevisited.Answer:TheIntroductionparthasbeenrewrittenbothincontentsandinEnglish.Weparticularlyrevisedsomesentencessincetheyarenotcorrectorsoconfusing.3. Materialsandmethods-DetailsofthechemicalstobefurnishedAnswer:Thereviewe

18、randeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandthedetailsofthechemicalshasbeenshowninPage4line79-83.4. CharacterizationarerequiredforPE(Molecularweight,grade)andGoethiteprepared(particlesize,BETsurfacearea,SEM-EDSandXRD)Answer:ThereviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandthecharacterizationforPEhasbee

19、nshowninPage4line79.TheGoethiteprepared(particlesize,BETsurfacearea,SEMandXRD)hasbeenreportedbyLiaoetal.(2007),WeclarifythatintherevisedmanuscriptinPage5line91-93.5. AschematicdiagramoftheexperimentalsetuptobegivenAnswer:Thereviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandaschematicdiagramoftheexperim

20、entalhasbeengiveninFig.1inthepresentpaper.TheoriginalFig.1.waschangedtoFig.2andFig.3.6. Results-Arateequationshouldbeproposedfromthetime-weightdataAnswer:ThereviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandtherateequationaschematicdiagramoftheexperimentalhasbeengiveninTable.1inthepresentpaper.7. Afewd

21、ataarerequiredtoshowtheinfluenceofprocessparameterssuchasgoethiteloading,intensityofUVradiation.Answer:ReviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandtheinfluenceofgoethiteloadinghasbeenshowninFig.2inthepresentpaper.AndtheinfluenceofintensityofUVradiationhasbeenshowninFig.3inthepresentpaper.Theorigi

22、nalFig.2waschangedtoFig.4andTheoriginalFig.3waschangedtoFig.5inthepresentpaper.8. Untilotherintermediatesareisolated,uptoEqn.(7)(line162)issufficient.Answer:ReviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandWechangedtheEqnsasrecommended.Eqs.(8)-(12)aredeletedandEqn.(7)waschangeto(CH2CH2)-+.OH-degradati

23、onproducts”(Page9line184).9. Figure3and4:3pairsarerequired,namely(i)OnlyPEfilmbeforeandafterirradiation,(ii)PE-Goethitefilm(0.4wt%)-beforeandafterirradiation(iii)PE-Goethitefilm(1.0wt%)-beforeandafterirradiation.Answer:ReviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandtheoriginalFig.3and4waschangedtoFi

24、g.5inthepresentpaper.10. Point3aboveisalsoapplicableforSEMphotographs.PleaserearrangeandclearlymarkthedifferencebetweenthefilmsbeforeandafterirradiationforbothSEMandFTIRresults.Answer:Thankthereviewerandeditorsforthecomments.Duringtherevisionofthepaper,wedidasupplementaryexperimentgotsomenewSEMphoto

25、graphs,whichhasbeenshowninFig.4inthepresentpaper.AndTheFTIRresultshasbeenrearrangedinFig.5inthepresentpaper,respectively.11. ItshouldbeclearlymentionedintheconclusionthatthedegradationwasmorewhengoethiteloadingandintensityoflightbothweremoreAnswer:Thereviewerandeditorssuggestionshavebeenadoptedandth

26、econclusionshasbeenchangedinPage9line192-198.1.DearProf.XXXX,ThankyouverymuchforyourletterandthecommentsfromtherefereesaboutourpapersubmittedtoXXXX(MSNumberXXXX).Wehavecheckedthemanuscriptandreviseditaccordingtothecomments.Wesubmitheretherevisedmanuscriptaswellasalistofchanges.Ifyouhaveanyquestionab

27、outthispaper,pleasedonthesitatetoletmeknow.Sincerelyyours,Dr.XXXXResp*etoReviewer1:Thanksforyourcommentsonourpaper.Wehaverevisedourpaperaccordingtoyourcomments:1. XXXXXXX2. XXXXXXX2)DearProfessor*,Re:An*RotatingRigid-flexibleCoupledSystem(No.:JSV-D-06-*)by*Manythanksforyouremailof24Jun2006,regarding

28、therevisionandadviceoftheabovepaperinJSV.Overallthecommentshavebeenfair,encouragingandc*tructive.Wehavelearnedmuchfromit.Aftercarefullystudyingthereviewercommentsandyouradvice,wehavemadecorrespondingchangestothepaper.Ourresp*eofthecommentsisenclosed.Ifyouneedanyotherinformation,pleasecontactmeimmedi

29、atelybyemail.Myemailaccountis*,andTel.is*,andFaxis+*.Yourssincerely,Detailedresp*etoreviewerscommentsandAsianEditorsadviceOverallthecommentshavebeenfair,encouragingandc*tructive.Wehavelearnedmuchfromit.Althoughthereviewerscommentsaregenerallypositive,wehavecarefullyproofreadthemanuscriptandedititasf

30、ollowing.(1)(2)3) )(4)(5)(6)Besidestheabovechanges,wehavecorrectedsomeexpressionerrors.Thankyouverymuchfortheexcellentandprofessionalrevisionofourmanuscript.3.文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持.Themanuscriptisrevisedsubmission(xxxxxxx)withnewlineandpagenumbersinthetext,somegrammarandspellingerrorshadal

31、sobeencorrected.Furthermore,therelevantregulati*hadbeenmadeintheoriginalmanuscriptaccordingtothecommentsofreviewers,andthemajorrevisedporti*weremarkedinredbold.Wealsorespondedpointbypointtoeachreviewercommentsaslistedbelow,alongwithaclearindicationofthelocationoftherevision.Hopethesewillmakeitmoreac

32、ceptableforpublication.ListofMajorChanges:1)2)3)Resp*etoReviewers:1)2)3)Resp*etoReviewerXXWeverymuchappreciatethecarefulreadingofourmanuscriptandvaluablesuggesti*ofthereviewer.Wehavecarefullyc*ideredthecommentsandhaverevisedthemanuscriptaccordingly.Thecommentscanbesummarizedasfollows:1) XX2) XX文檔來源為

33、 :從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持Detailedresp*es1) XX2) XX4.DeareditorXXWehavereceivedthecommentsonourmanuscriptentitled“XX”byXX.Accordingtothecommentsofthereviewers,wehaverevisedourmanuscript.Therevisedmanuscriptandthedetailedresp*estothecommentsoftheonereviewerareattached.Sincerelyyours,XX5.Resp*etoRevi

34、ewerAReviewerAverykindlycontactedmedirectly,andrevealedhimselftobeProfessorDr.Hans-GeorgGeissleroftheUniversityofLeipzig.Iwrotehimageneralresp*etobothreviewsinJanuary2000,followedbytheseresp*estospecificpoints,bothhisown,andthoseoftheotherreviewer.Resp*etoSpecificPointsWhatfollowsisabriefandcursoryd

35、iscussionofthevariousissuesraisedbyyourselfandtheotherreviewer.Ifyoushouldreviseyourjudgmentofthevalidityofthetheory,thesepointswillbeaddressedatgreaterlengthinanewversionofthepaperthatIwouldresubmittoPsychologicalReview.Resp*etoSpecificPoints-ReviewerA:Inpart(1)ofyourcritiquethemajorcomplaintisthat

36、notheoryispresented,whichwasdiscussedabove.Youcontinue"Regrettably,notmuchattentionisdrawntospecificdifferencesbetweenthechosenexamplesthatwouldbenecessarytopinpointspecificitiesofperceptionmoreprecisely",and"ifperceptualsystems,assuggested,hler(KindeedactonthebasisofHR,theremustbeman

37、ymorespecificc*traintsinvolvedtoensurespecial'veridicality'propertiesoftheperceptualoutcome",and"thedifficultanalyticproblemsofconcretemodelingofperceptionarenoteventouched".Themodelaspresentedisnotamodelofvisionorauditionoranyotherparticularmodality,butisageneralmodeltoconfro

38、ntthealternativeneuralreceptivefieldparadigm,althoughexamplesfromvisualperceptionareusedtoexemplifytheprinciplesdiscussed.Themorespecificvisualmodelwassubmittedelsewhere,intheOrientationalHarmonicmodel,whereIshowedhowharmonicresonanceaccountsforspecificvisualillusoryeffects.Asdiscussedabove,theattem

39、pthereistoproposeageneralprincipleofneurocomputation,ratherthanaspecificmodelofvisual,auditory,oranyotherspecificsensorymodality.Again,whatIamproposingisaparadigmratherthanatheory,i.e.analternativeprincipleofneurocomputationwithspecificanduniqueproperties,asanalternativetotheneurondoctrineparadigmof

40、thespatialreceptivefield.Ifthispaperiseventuallyacceptedforpublication,thenIwillresubmitmypapersonvisualillusoryphenomena,referringtothispapertojustifytheuseoftheunconventionalharmonicresonancemechanism.Inpart(2)(a)ofyourcritiqueyousay"itisnotclarifiedwhetherthepostulatedpropertiesofGestaltsact

41、uallyfollowfromthisdefinitionorpartlyderivefromadditionalc*traints."and"IdoubtthatanyofthereviewedexamplesforHRcantreatjustthecaseofhler:(1961,p.7)"Humanexperienceinthephenomenologicalsensecannotyetbetreatedwithourmostreliablemethods;andwhendealingwithit,wemaybeforcedtoformnewconcepts

42、whichatfirst,willoftenbeabitvague."WolfgangKthedogcitedtodem*trate'emergence'.Forthisahierarchyrelationisneeded."TheprincipleofemergenceinGestalttheoryisaverydifficultconcepttoexpressinunambiguousterms,andthedogpicturewaspresentedtoillustratethisratherelusiveconceptwithaconcreteexa

43、mple.IdonotsuggestthatHRasproposedinthispapercanaddressthedogpictureassuch,sincethisisspecificallyavisualproblem,andtheHRmodelaspresentedisnotavisualmodel.Rather,Iproposethatthefeaturedetectionparadigmcannotinprinciplehandlethiskindofambiguity,becausethelocalfeaturesdonotindividuallycontaintheinform

44、ationnecessarytodistinguishsignificantfrominsignificantedges.ThesolutionoftheHRapproachtovisualambiguityisexplainedinthepaperinthesectionon"RecognitionbyReification"(p.15-17)inwhichIproposethatrecognitionisnotsimplyamatterof文檔來源為 :從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持theidentificationoffeaturesinthein

45、put,i.e.bythe"lightingup"ofahigherlevelfeaturenode,butitinvolvesasimultaneousabstractionandreification,inwhichthehigherlevelfeaturenodereifiesitsparticularpatternbackattheinputlevel,modulatedbytheexactpatternoftheinput.Iappealtothereadertoseethereifiedformofthedogasperceivededgesandsurface

46、sthatarenotpresentintheinputstimulus,asevidenceforthisreificationinperception,whichappearsatthesametimethattherecognitionoccurs.Theremarkablepropertyofthisreificationisthatthedogappearsnotasanimageofacanonical,orprototypicaldog,butasadogperceptthatiswarpedtotheexactpostureandconfigurationallowedbyth

47、einput,asobservedinthesubjectiveexperienceofthedogpicture.Thisexplanationissubjecttoyourcriticisminyourgeneralcomments,that"theauthordem*tratesmoreinsightthanexplicitlystatedinassumpti*anddrawnconclusi*".Icanonlysaythat,inKuhn'swords,sometimesitisonlypersonalandinarticulateaestheticc*i

48、derati*thatcanbeusedtomakethecase.InthewordsofWolfgangK?hler:(1961,p.7)"Humanexperienceinthephenomenologicalsensecannotyetbetreatedwithourmostreliablemethods;andwhendealingwithit,wemaybeforcedtoformnewconceptswhichatfirst,willoftenbeabitvague."WolfgangK?hler(K?hler1923p.64)"Naturalsci

49、encescontinuallyadvanceexplanatoryhyptotheses,whichcannotbeverifiedbydirectobservationatthetimewhentheyareformedSomenorforalongtimethereafter.OfsuchakindwereAmpere'stheoryofmagnetism,thekinetictheoryofgases,theelectronictheory,thehypothesisofatomicdisintegrationinthetheoryofradioactivity.ofthese

50、assumpti*havesincebeenverifiedbydirectobservation,orhaveatleastcomeclosetosuchdirectverification;othersarestillfarremovedfromit.Butphysicsandchemistrywouldhavebeencondemnedtoapermanentembryonicstatehadtheyabstainedfromsuchhypotheses;theirdevelopmentseemsratherlikeacontinuouseffortsteadilytoshortenth

51、erestofthewaytotheverificationofhypotheseswhichsurvivethisprocess"Insection(2)(b)ofyourcritiqueyoucomplainthat"thereisnoseriousdiscussionofpossiblealternatives",andyoumentionNeo-Gibsonianapproaches,PDP,Grossberg'sARTmodelandPribram'sholographictheory.Inthenextversionofthepaper

52、thisomissionwillbecorrected,approximatelyasfollows.Gibson'suseofthetermresonanceisreallyametaphoricaldevice,sinceGibsonoffersnomechanismsoranalogiesofperceptualprocesses,butmerelysuggeststhatthereisatwo-wayflowofinformation(resonance)betweenbehaviorandtheenvironment.Thisisreallymerelyametaphor,r

53、atherthanamodel.ThePDPapproachdoesaddresstheissueofemergence,butsincethebasiccomputationalunitoftheneuralnetworkmodelisahard-wiredreceptivefield,thistheorysuffersallthelimitati*ofatemplatetheory.ThesameholdsforGrossberg's"AdaptiveResonanceTheory",whichalsousesthewordresonancemetaphoric

54、allytosuggestabottom-uptop-downmatching,butinGrossberg'smodelthatmatchingisactuallyperformedbyreceptivefields,orspatialtemplates.TheARTmodeldem*tratesthelimitati*ofthisapproach.Fortheonlywaythatahigher-leveldetector,or"F2node",canexhibitgeneralizationtodifferentinputpatterns,isforittoh

55、avesynapticweightstoallofthepatternstowhichitresponds.Inessence,thepatternofsynapticweightsisasuperpositionorblurringtogetherofallofthepossibleinputpatternstowhichtheF2nodeshouldrespond.Intop-downprimingmodethereforethatF2nodewould"print"thatsameblurredpatternbackatthelower"F1node&quo

56、t;level,activatingallofthepossiblepatternstowhichthatF2nodeistunedtorespond.ForexampleifanARTmodelweretrainedtorespondtoan"X"-shapedfeaturepresentedatallpossibleorientati*,top-downprimingofthisnodeaftertrainingwould"print"apatternofallthoseX-shapedfeaturesatallorientati*superimpo

57、sed,whichissimplyanamorphousblob.Infact,thatsamenodewouldrespondevenbettertoablobfeaturethantoanysingleXfeature.InthepresenceofapartialorambiguousX-likepatternpresentedataparticularorientation,theARTmodelcouldnotcompletethatpatternspecifictoitsorientation.TheHRmodelontheotherhandoffersadifferentandu

58、niqueprincipleofrepresentation,inwhichtop-downactivationofthehigherlevelnodecancompleteapartialorambiguousinputpatterninthespecificorientationatwhichitappears,butthatsameprimingwouldcompletethepatterndifferentlyifitappearedinadifferentorientation.Thisgeneralizationinrecognition,butspecificationincom

59、pletion,isapropertythatisuniquetotheharmonicresonancerepresentation.Kuhnobservesthattheoldparadigmcanalwaysbereformulatedtoaccountforanyparticularphenomenonaddressedbythenewparadigm,justasthePtolomaicearth-centeredcosmologycouldaccountforthemoti*oftheplanetstoarbitraryprecision,givenenoughnestedcyclesandepicyclesofthecrystalspheres.Similarly,aconventionalneuralnetworkmodelcanalwaysbecontriv